Similar articles

Abstract: The double-threshold method has been widely used in ultrasonic flow measurement to determine time-of-flight (TOF) due to its low cost and ease of implementation. Performance of this method is negatively affected by the cycle-skip phenomenon which occurs frequently under inconstant working conditions, especially varied fluid temperature. This paper proposes a method to suppress the phenomenon to facilitate reliable determination of TOF in ultrasonic flow measurement. First, the double-threshold method is used to generate a feature point to segment the signal. Second, based on the correlation coefficient and signal power, judgement factors of individual signal periods are calculated to determine signal onset. Finally, a valid zero crossing which has a constant lag from the onset is selected to determine the TOF. Thus, the cycle-skip phenomenon is suppressed. Two additional modifications are proposed to eliminate the influence of varied signal frequency and low sampling rate. The proposed method was validated by an experiment based on an ultrasonic water flow sensor. Results showed that the frequently appearing cycle-skip phenomenon can be successfully suppressed by the proposed method.

一种在超声波流量测量中避免渡跃时间跳波的方法

[1]Barshan B, 2000. Fast processing techniques for accurate ultrasonic range measurements. Measurement Science and Technology, 11(1):45-50.

[2]Beck MS, 1981. Correlation in instruments: cross correlation flowmeters. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 14(1):7-19.

[3]Bravo EC, Bastos TF, Martin JM, et al., 1994. Ultrasonics —temperature shapes the envelope. Sensor Review, 14(4):19-23.

[4]Carullo A, Parvis M, 2001. An ultrasonic sensor for distance measurement in automotive applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 1(2):143.

[5]Demirli R, Saniie J, 2001. Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: analysis and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 48(3):787-802.

[6]Espinosa L, Bacca J, Prieto F, et al., 2018. Accuracy on the time-of-flight estimation for ultrasonic waves applied to non-destructive evaluation of standing trees: a comparative experimental study. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 104(3):429-439.

[7]Fang ZH, Hu L, Mao K, et al., 2018. Similarity judgment-based double-threshold method for time-of-flight determination in an ultrasonic gas flowmeter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 67(1):24-32.

[8]Frederiksen TM, Howard WM, 1974. A single-chip monolithic sonar system. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 9(6):394-403.

[9]Hoseini MR, Wang XD, Zuo MJ, 2012. Estimating ultrasonic time of flight using envelope and quasi maximum likelihood method for damage detection and assessment. Measurement, 45(8):2072-2080.

[10]Hou HR, Zheng DD, Nie LX, 2015. Gas ultrasonic flow rate measurement through genetic-ant colony optimization based on the ultrasonic pulse received signal model. Measurement Science and Technology, 26(4):045005.

[11]Jiang YD, Wang BL, Huang ZY, et al., 2017. A model-based transit-time ultrasonic gas flowrate measurement method. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 66(5):879-887.

[12]Li WH, Chen Q, Wu JT, 2014. Double threshold ultrasonic distance measurement technique and its application. Review of Scientific Instruments, 85(4):044905.

[13]Lu ZK, Yang C, Qin DH, et al., 2016. Estimating ultrasonic time-of-flight through echo signal envelope and modified Gauss Newton method. Measurement, 94:355-363.

[14]Lynnworth LC, Liu Y, 2006. Ultrasonic flowmeters: half-century progress report, 1955-2005. Ultrasonics, 44(Sl):e1371-e1378.

[15]Lyons RG, 2004. Understanding Digital Signal Processing, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, USA, p.678-681.

[16]Rajita G, Mandal N, 2016. Review on transit time ultrasonic flowmeter. The 2nd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Energy & Communication (CIEC), p.88-92.

[17]Roosnek N, 2000. Novel digital signal processing techniques for ultrasonic gas flow measurements. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 11(2):89-99.

[18]Sabatini AM, 1997. Correlation receivers using Laguerre filter banks for modelling narrowband ultrasonic echoes and estimating their time-of-flights. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 44(6):1253-1263.

[19]Sunol F, Ochoa DA, Garcia JE, 2019. High-precision time-of-flight determination algorithm for ultrasonic flow measurement. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 68(8):2724-2732.

[20]Tezuka K, Mori M, Suzuki T, et al., 2008. Ultrasonic pulse-Doppler flow meter application for hydraulic power plants. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 19(3-4):155-162.

[21]Wu J, Zhu JG, Yang LH, et al., 2014. A highly accurate ultrasonic ranging method based on onset extraction and phase shift detection. Measurement, 47:433-441.

[22]Zheng DD, Hou HR, Zhang T, 2016. Research and realization of ultrasonic gas flow rate measurement based on ultrasonic exponential model. Ultrasonics, 67:112-119.

[23]Zhu WJ, Xu KJ, Fang M, et al., 2017. Variable ratio threshold and zero-crossing detection based signal processing method for ultrasonic gas flow meter. Measurement, 103: 343-352.