
Yanhui ZHAO, Zhenfeng WANG, Shunping ZHANG, Shimao WANG, Xuechen LI, Ye TIAN. Flow structure and mixing characteristics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow under varied boundary layers[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2026, 27(9): 1028-1042.
@article{title="Flow structure and mixing characteristics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow under varied boundary layers",
author="Yanhui ZHAO, Zhenfeng WANG, Shunping ZHANG, Shimao WANG, Xuechen LI, Ye TIAN",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="27",
number="9",
pages="1028-1042",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2500490"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Flow structure and mixing characteristics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow under varied boundary layers
%A Yanhui ZHAO
%A Zhenfeng WANG
%A Shunping ZHANG
%A Shimao WANG
%A Xuechen LI
%A Ye TIAN
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 27
%N 9
%P 1028-1042
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2500490
TY - JOUR
T1 - Flow structure and mixing characteristics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow under varied boundary layers
A1 - Yanhui ZHAO
A1 - Zhenfeng WANG
A1 - Shunping ZHANG
A1 - Shimao WANG
A1 - Xuechen LI
A1 - Ye TIAN
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 27
IS - 9
SP - 1028
EP - 1042
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2500490
Abstract: Efficient fuel-air mixing within milliseconds is critical for scramjet performance, yet the flow physics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow remains insufficiently quantified. Planar Rayleigh/Mie scattering and stereoscopic particle-image velocimetry were applied to a Mach 2.68 crossflow. Jets with a 2 mm orifice diameter were injected at three dynamic-pressure ratios (1.64, 4.92, and 8.19) under two incoming boundary layer thicknesses (1 and 4 mm). Instantaneous imaging captured the bow shock, barrel shock, Mach disk, slip line, recirculation zone, and counterrotating vortex pair (CVP). Vorticity fields revealed streamwise vortices forming beside the barrel shock, merging 20 mm downstream from the jet orifice, and persisting as a typical CVP that entrained freestream fluid. Boundary layer thickness systematically enhanced jet penetration and modulated near-field breakup patterns without altering far-field mixing limits. The penetration depth was fitted using a modified correlation, indicating an approximately 10%–20% increase when the boundary layer thickness increased from 1 to 4 mm. Lateral diffusion reached 15 mm at the orifice and plateaued at 20 mm beyond 20 mm downstream from the jet orifice. Fractal analysis partitioned the jet plume edges into three regions. A thicker boundary layer elevated the initial fractal dimension in Region I but suppressed its growth in Region II, whereas Region III exhibited consistent rapid fragmentation. The quantitative datasets and key parameters established benchmarks for validating computational fluid dynamics simulations and scramjet engine designs.
[1]AnokhinMD, VinogradovYA, ZubkovAI, et al., 1998. Determination of the shape of the shocks ahead of a transverse jet injected into a supersonic flow. Fluid Dynamics, 33(2):186-189.
[2]BaoH, YangD, LiY, et al., 2024. Effect of local equivalent ratio on spark ignition characteristics in a kerosene scramjet combustor at Mach 4 flight condition. Aerospace Science and Technology, 153:109460.
[3]Ben-YakarA, MungalMG, HansonRK, 2006. Time evolution and mixing characteristics of hydrogen and ethylene transverse jets in supersonic crossflows. Physics of Fluids, 18(2):026101.
[4]ErdemE, KontisK, 2021. Experimental investigation of sonic transverse jets in Mach 5 crossflow. Aerospace Science and Technology, 110:106419.
[5]FriesD, RanjanD, MenonS, 2021. Turbulent mixing and trajectories of jets in a supersonic cross-flow with different injectants. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 911:A45.
[6]GambaM, MungalMG, 2015. Ignition, flame structure and near-wall burning in transverse hydrogen jets in supersonic crossflow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 780:226-273.
[7]GlagolevAI, ZubkovAI, PanovYA, 1967. Supersonic flow past a gas jet obstacle emerging from a plate. Fluid Dynamics, 2(3):60-64.
[8]GlagolevAI, ZubkovAI, PanovYA, 1968. Interaction between a supersonic flow and gas issuing from a hole in a plate. Fluid Dynamics, 3(2):65-67.
[9]GruberMR, NejadAS, ChenTH, et al., 1997. Compressibility effects in supersonic transverse injection flow fields. Physics of Fluids, 9(5):1448-1461.
[10]HuangW, 2016. Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows. Aerospace Science and Technology, 50:183-195.
[11]HuangW, DuZB, YanL, et al., 2019. Supersonic mixing in airbreathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flights. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 109:100545.
[12]IwasaT, TsuboiN, 2022. Numerical simulation of jet mixing in supersonic crossflow: effect of jet exit geometry. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 65(4):172-184.
[13]JiaDP, YangK, PanY, et al., 2022. Effect of the micro vortex generator on the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in supersonic flows. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 23(5):405-414.
[14]KeaneRD, AdrianRJ, 1992. Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images. Applied Scientific Research, 49(3):191-215.
[15]LiangCH, SunMB, LiuY, et al., 2020. Numerical study of flow structures and mixing characteristics of a sonic jet in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 166:78-88.
[16]LiuCY, WangZG, WangHB, et al., 2015. Numerical investigation on mixing and combustion of transverse hydrogen jet in a high-enthalpy supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 116:93-105.
[17]LiuCY, YuJF, WangZG, et al., 2019. Characteristics of hydrogen jet combustion in a high-enthalpy supersonic crossflow. Physics of Fluids, 31(4):046105.
[18]LiuY, SunMB, LiangCH, et al., 2018. Structures of near-wall wakes subjected to a sonic jet in a supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 151:886-892.
[19]LiuY, SunMB, YangYX, et al., 2020. Turbulent boundary layer subjected to a sonic transverse jet in a supersonic flow. Aerospace Science and Technology, 104:106016.
[20]MaheshK, 2013. The interaction of jets with crossflow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45:379-407.
[21]PortzR, SegalC, 2006. Penetration of gaseous jets in supersonic flows. AIAA Journal, 44(10):2426-2429.
[22]SantiagoJG, DuttonJC, 1997. Velocity measurements of a jet injected into a supersonic crossflow. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 13(2):264-273.
[23]ShiW, TianY, ZhangWZ, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation on flame stabilization of a kerosene-fueled scramjet combustor with pilot hydrogen. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 21(8):663-672.
[24]SteinbergAM, SadanandanR, DemC, et al., 2013. Structure and stabilization of hydrogen jet flames in cross-flows. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1):1499-1507.
[25]SunMB, HuZW, 2018a. Generation of upper trailing counter-rotating vortices of a sonic jet in a supersonic crossflow. AIAA Journal, 56(3):1047-1059.
[26]SunMB, HuZW, 2018b. Mixing in nearwall regions downstream of a sonic jet in a supersonic crossflow at Mach 2.7. Physics of Fluids, 30(10):106102.
[27]SunMB, ZhangSP, ZhaoYH, et al., 2013. Experimental investigation on transverse jet penetration into a supersonic turbulent crossflow. Science China Technological Sciences, 56(8):1989-1998.
[28]VinogradovYA, ZhilenkoDY, ZubkovAI, et al., 1999. Flow pattern in the vicinity of an annular system of transverse jets in a supersonic stream. Fluid Dynamics, 34(1):17-22.
[29]VitiV, NeelR, SchetzJA, 2009. Detailed flow physics of the supersonic jet interaction flow field. Physics of Fluids, 21(4):046101.
[30]WangHB, WangZG, SunMB, et al., 2013. Hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in a supersonic crossflow. Science China Technological Sciences, 56(6):1435-1448.
[31]WangH, XiaoW, WangC, et al., 2024. Eulerian–Lagrangian direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation in a compressible multiphase transverse jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1001:A10.
[32]YiSH, TianLF, ZhaoYX, et al., 2010. Aero-optical aberration measuring method based on NPLS and its application. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(31):3545-3549.
[33]ZhangHH, XiaoYF, HeK, et al., 2025. The 3D flow characteristics of a sonic transverse jet in laminar supersonic crossflow. Aerospace Science and Technology, 167:110661.
[34]ZhangL, CaoYT, LiangJH, et al., 2023. Effects of inflow velocity on transverse jet injection in a supersonic cavity combustor. Physics of Fluids, 35(11):116121.
[35]ZhangJC, SunMB, WangZG, et al., 2021. Stabilization mechanisms of lifted flames in a supersonic stepped-wall jet combustor. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 22(4):314-330.
[36]ZhaoYH, LiangJH, ZhaoYX, 2016. Vortex structure and breakup mechanism of gaseous jet in supersonic crossflow with laminar boundary layer. Acta Astronautica, 128:140-146.
[37]ZhaoYH, LiangJH, ZhangSP, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation on flow characteristics of a transverse jet with an upstream vortex generator. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 21(8):636-651.
[38]ZhaoYX, YiSH, TianLF, et al., 2009. Supersonic flow imaging via nanoparticles. Science in China, Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(12):3640-3648.
[39]ZhaoYX, YiSH, TianLF, et al., 2010. Density field measurement and approximate reconstruction of supersonic mixing layer. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(19):2004-2009.
[40]ZhuYZ, YiSH, GangD, et al., 2015. Visualisation on supersonic flow over backward-facing step with or without roughness. Journal of Turbulence, 16(7):633-649.
[41]ZubkovAI, LyagushinBE, PanovYA, et al., 1994. Interaction of a transverse gas jet with supersonic flow in a dihedral. Fluid Dynamics, 29(6):872-875.
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2026-09-18
Received: 2025-10-13
Revision Accepted: 2026-03-27
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1105
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>