CLC number:
On-line Access: 2022-06-22
Received: 2022-01-03
Revision Accepted: 2022-05-10
Crosschecked: 2022-09-22
Cited: 0
Clicked: 865
Yan-bin SHEN, Hao-song SUN, An-dong LEI, Xiao-yuan YING, Guang YANG, Yao-zhi LUO. Static control method using gradient–genetic algorithm for grillage adaptive beam string structures based on minimal internal force[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200003 @article{title="Static control method using gradient–genetic algorithm for grillage adaptive beam string structures based on minimal internal force", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
采用梯度遗传算法的自适应交叉张弦梁结构最小内力目标静态控制方法机构:浙江大学,建筑工程学院,中国杭州,310058 目的:传统控制算法随着自适应结构空间与作动器数量的增加变得低效。本文旨在讨论适用于自适应交叉张弦结构等大空间多变量问题的主动控制算法,并提出自适应双向交叉张弦梁的主动控制模型,探究其在不同环境工况下的承载表现。 创新点:1.以梯度算子改进传统遗传算法,改善其早熟与收敛速度慢的缺陷;2.针对双向交叉张弦梁这一复杂空间结构提出控制方法,并建模验证。 方法:1.在传统遗传算法的选择、交叉和变异算子后加入梯度搜索算子,增强其局部搜索能力与快速收敛能力;2.以作动器作动量作为优化变量,上部梁最小内力工作系数作为目标函数,撑杆与下部索的许用应力作为约束条件,建立自适应双向张弦梁结构的静态主动控制方法;3.通过2×2与3×3的两个算例进行建模控制,以结构内力与位移评价其三种工况下的控制效率,验证所提方法的可行性和有效性。 结论:1.梯度遗传算法具有良好的局部搜索能力和全局优化能力,并且收敛速度快;2.相对传统静态结构,在文中的三种设计工况下,自适应交叉张弦梁结构的承载能力显著提高;3.对于张弦梁结构,风荷载有可能使拉索松弛,造成不利影响,而自适应张弦梁可以使拉索保持受拉状态,并使所有部件协同工作以达到更好的性能。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]AdamB, SmithIFC, 2007. Self-diagnosis and self-repair of an active tensegrity structure. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12):1752-1761. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1752) [2]AdamB, SmithIFC, 2008. Active tensegrity: a control framework for an adaptive civil-engineering structure. Computers & Structures, 86(23-24):2215-2223. [3]BaileyT, UbbardJE, 1985. Distributed piezoelectric-polymer active vibration control of a cantilever beam. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 8(5):605-611. [4]ChaYJ, AgrawalAK, 2013a. Decentralized output feedback polynomial control of seismically excited structures using genetic algorithm. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20(3):241-258. [5]ChaYJ, AgrawalAK, 2013b. Velocity based semi-active turbo-Lyapunov control algorithms for seismically excited nonlinear smart structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20(6):1043-1056. [6]HoqueE, MizunoT, IshinoY, et al., 2011. A three-axis vibration isolation system using modified zero-power controller with parallel mechanism technique. Mechatronics, 21(6):1055-1062. [7]KmetS, MojdisM, 2015. Adaptive cable dome. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(9):04014225. [8]KorkmazS, 2011. A review of active structural control: challenges for engineering informatics. Computers & Structures, 89(23-24):2113-2132. [9]LiB, ZhaoW, DengZQ, 2012. Modeling and analysis of a multi-dimensional vibration isolator based on the parallel mechanism. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31(1):50-58. [10]LiG, FahnestockLA, 2013. Seismic response of single-degree-of-freedom systems representing low-ductility steel concentrically braced frames with reserve capacity. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(2):199-211. [11]LiG, FahnestockLA, LiHN, 2013. Simulation of steel brace hysteretic response using the force analogy method. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(4):526-536. [12]LiSY, WangKW, 2015. Fluidic origami: a plant-inspired adaptive structure with shape morphing and stiffness tuning. Smart Materials and Structures, 24(10):105031. [13]NoackT, RuthJ, MullerU, 2006. Adaptive hybrid structures. International Conference on Adaptable Building Structures. [14]SampsonJR, 1976. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (John H. Holland). SIAM Review, 18(3):529-530. [15]SenatoreG, DuffourP, HannaS, et al., 2013. Designing adaptive structures for whole life energy savings. The Fifth International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, p.2105-2110. [16]SenatoreG, DuffourP, WinslowP, 2018a. Exploring the application domain of adaptive structures. Engineering Structures, 167:608-628. [17]SenatoreG, DuffourP, WinslowP, et al., 2018b. Shape control and whole-life energy assessment of an ‘infinitely stiff’ prototype adaptive structure. Smart Materials and Structures, 27(1):015022. [18]ShenYB, ChengHQ, YangPC, et al., 2013. A static control algorithm for adaptive beam string structures based on minimal displacement. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013:713768. [19]SobekW, TeuffelP, 2001. Adaptive systems in architecture and structural engineering. Proceedings of SPIE 4330, Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, p.36-45. [20]SunXT, XuJ, JingXJ, et al., 2014. Beneficial performance of a quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator with time-delayed active control. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 82:32-40. [21]van BommelRJT, HabrakenAPHW, TeuffelP, 2016. Adaptive arch: active stress minimization in a thin arch structure. Procedia Engineering, 155:265-274. [22]VenanziI, 2016. A review on adaptive methods for structural control. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 10(1):653-667. [23]XuJ, SunXT, 2015. A multi-directional vibration isolator based on Quasi-Zero-Stiffness structure and time-delayed active control. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 100:126-135. [24]XuX, LuoY, 2009. Non-linear displacement control of prestressed cable structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 223(7):1001-1007. [25]YunY, LiYM, 2011. A general dynamics and control model of a class of multi-DOF manipulators for active vibration control. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 46(10):1549-1574. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>