CLC number:
On-line Access: 2023-03-17
Received: 2022-03-31
Revision Accepted: 2022-10-06
Crosschecked: 2023-03-17
Cited: 0
Clicked: 807
Yougang SUN, Fengxing LI, Guobin LIN, Junqi XU, Zhenyu HE. Adaptive fault-tolerant control of high-speed maglev train suspension system with partial actuator failure: design and experiments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200189 @article{title="Adaptive fault-tolerant control of high-speed maglev train suspension system with partial actuator failure: design and experiments", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
高速磁悬浮列车部分执行器故障自适应容错控制的设计与实验机构:1同济大学,铁道与城市轨道交通研究院,中国上海,201804;2同济大学,国家磁浮交通工程研发中心,中国上海,201804 目的:在强磁场持续运行下,高速磁悬浮列车悬浮系统的执行器容易发生部分故障,使得悬浮控制问题具有挑战性。为了降低容错的成本和能耗,提升高速磁悬浮列车悬浮系统对执行器故障的容忍度,本文从实用的角度出发,提出一种新型的高速磁浮列车悬浮系统自适应补偿非线性容错控制策略。 创新点:1.无需知道执行器的故障信息,自适应补偿控制律随系统故障的发生而变化,并自适应地进行重构,降低系统的保守性;2.在没有任何线性化近似的情况下,证明控制器的设计和稳定性。 方法:1.通过数学推导,建立基于连接结构的悬浮系统的动力学模型(图2和公式(12));2.通过理论分析,描述执行器故障的类型(公式(14));3.通过数学分析,设计一种具有自适应更新律的非线性容错悬浮控制律,以实现针对部分执行器故障的稳定悬浮(公式(19)和(20))。利用Lyapunov理论和扩展的Barbalat引理来严格证明闭环渐近稳定性(公式(23));4.通过在高速磁悬浮车辆-轨道磁耦合实验平台进行硬件实验,验证所提方法的可行性和有效性(图4~17)。 结论:1.提出的具有自适应补偿的非线性容错控制策略在无故障诊断和隔离的情况下,实现了部分执行器故障时优越的悬浮控制性能;推导出的容错控制律结构简单,可以随着故障的发生而自适应变化,从而提高了系统的可靠性和暂态性能;通过严格的数学分析,证明了整个闭环系统是全局渐近稳定的。2.通过硬件实验,实现了常规悬浮控制或跟踪悬浮控制,同时也补偿了实际中的部分执行器故障,证明所提方法具有良好的鲁棒性。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]AliSA, GuermoucheM, LangloisN, 2015. Fault-tolerant control based super-twisting algorithm for the diesel engine air path subject to loss-of-effectiveness and additive actuator faults. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(15):4309-4329. [2]AllerhandLI, ShakedU, 2015. Robust switching-based fault tolerant control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(8):2272-2276. [3]BenosmanM, LumKY, 2010. Passive actuators’ fault-tolerant control for affine nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 18(1):152-163. [4]BoldeaI, TuteleaLN, XuW, et al., 2018. Linear electric machines, drives, and maglevs: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(9):7504-7515. [5]ChenC, XuJQ, RongLJ, et al., 2022. Neural-network-state-observation-based adaptive inversion control method of maglev train. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 71(4):3660-3669. [6]ChenHX, LongZQ, ChangWS, 2006. Fault tolerant control research for high-speed maglev system with sensor failure. The 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, p.2281-2285. [7]DingJF, YangX, LongZQ, 2019. Structure and control design of levitation electromagnet for electromagnetic suspension medium-speed maglev train. Journal of Vibration and Control, 25(6):1179-1193. [8]FangYT, YaoYY, 2007. Dynamic performance analysis model of high-reliability EMS-maglev system. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 8(3):412-415. [9]GaoZF, ChengP, QianMS, et al., 2018. Active fault-tolerant control approach design for rigid spacecraft with multiple actuator faults. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 232(10):1365-1378. [10]GuoG, LiP, HaoLY, 2020. Adaptive fault-tolerant control of platoons with guaranteed traffic flow stability. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(7):6916-6927. [11]HamayunMT, EdwardsC, AlwiH, 2013. A fault tolerant control allocation scheme with output integral sliding modes. Automatica, 49(6):1830-1837. [12]HanKZ, ChenCZ, ChenMD, et al., 2021a. Constrained active fault tolerant control based on active fault diagnosis and interpolation optimization. Entropy, 23(8):924. [13]HanKZ, FengJ, ZhaoQ, et al., 2021b. Robust constrained predictive fault-tolerant control with generalized input parameterization and event-triggered regulation: design and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 68(9):8615-8625. [14]JinXZ, YangGH, 2009. Robust adaptive fault-tolerant compensation control with actuator failures and bounded disturbances. Acta Automatica Sinica, 35(3):305-309. [15]LeeHW, KimKC, LeeJ, 2006. Review of maglev train technologies. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42(7):1917-1925. [16]LiN, SunHY, ZhangQL, 2019. Robust passive adaptive fault tolerant control for stochastic wing flutter via delay control. European Journal of Control, 48:74-82. [17]LiXL, ZhangZZ, LongZQ, et al., 2008. Fault-tolerant control for maglev train with joint-structure based on simultaneous stablization. Control Engineering of China, 15(6):724-727 (in Chinese). [18]LiXL, ZhaiMD, HaoAM, 2017. Maglev train suspension control parameters optimization based on output saturation. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 39(4):149-153 (in Chinese). [19]LiXY, WangJZ, 2020. Active fault-tolerant consensus control of Lipschitz nonlinear multiagent systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 30(13):5233-5252. [20]LiY, LiJ, ZhangG, et al., 2013. Disturbance decoupled fault diagnosis for sensor fault of maglev suspension system. Journal of Central South University, 20(6):1545-1551. [21]LongZQ, XueS, ZhangZZ, et al., 2007. A new strategy of active fault-tolerant control for suspension system of maglev train. IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, p.88-94. [22]LongZQ, XueS, ChenHX, 2008. Passive fault tolerant control for suspension system of Maglev train based on LMI. Computer Simulation, 25(2):265-268 (in Chinese). [23]LongZQ, LiY, HeG, 2010. Research on electromagnet fault diagnosis technology of suspension control system of maglev train. Control and Decision, 25(7):1004-1009 (in Chinese). [24]LuoJ, 2020. Research on Fault Diagnosis Method of Suspension System of High Speed Maglev Train. MS Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China (in Chinese). [25]ShenQ, YueCF, GohCH, et al., 2019. Active fault-tolerant control system design for spacecraft attitude maneuvers with actuator saturation and faults. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(5):3763-3772. [26]StefanovskiJD, 2018. Passive fault tolerant perfect tracking with additive faults. Automatica, 87:432-436. [27]StefanovskiJD, 2019. Fault tolerant control of descriptor systems with disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 64(3):976-988. [28]StoustrupJ, BlondelVD, 2004. Fault tolerant control: a simultaneous stabilization result. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(2):305-310. [29]SunN, FangYC, ChenH, 2017. Tracking control for magnetic-suspension systems with online unknown mass identification. Control Engineering Practice, 58:242-253. [30]SunYG, XuJQ, LinGB, et al., 2022. RBF neural network-based supervisor control for maglev vehicles on an elastic track with network time delay. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(1):509-519. [31]SungHK, KimDS, ChoHJ, et al., 2004. Fault tolerant control of electromagnetic levitation system. Proceedings of the 18th Magnetically Levitated System and Linear Drives Conference, p.676-688. [32]WangZQ, 2019. Fault Diagnosis and Tolerant Control for High Speed Maglev Train Suspension System. PhD Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China (in Chinese). [33]WangZQ, LiXL, WangQZ, 2014. Current sensor active fault tolerance control based on feedback gain reconfiguration. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 511-512:1012-1016. [34]WangZQ, LongZQ, LiXL, 2019. Fault analysis and tolerant control for high speed PEMS maglev train end joint structure with disturbance rejection. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 14(3):1357-1366. [35]WangZQ, LongZQ, LiXL, 2021. Fault tolerant control for joint structure in PEMS high speed maglev train. Asian Journal of Control, 23(1):486-498. [36]XuJQ, LinGB, ChenC, et al., 2021. A Simulation Platform of Suspension Control for High Speed and Medium and Low Speed Maglev Train. CN Patent CN111103809B(in Chinese). [37]YanXG, EdwardsC, 2008. Adaptive sliding-mode-observer-based fault reconstruction for nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(11):4029-4036. [38]YangH, ZhangKP, WangX, 2012. Multi-model switching predictive control with active fault tolerance for high-speed train. Control Theory & Applications, 29(9):1211-1214 (in Chinese). [39]YetendjeA, SeronMM, DonáJAD, et al., 2010. Sensor fault-tolerant control of a magnetic levitation system. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 20(18):2108-2121. [40]ZhaiMD, LongZQ, LiXL, 2019. Fault-tolerant control of magnetic levitation system based on state observer in high speed maglev train. IEEE Access, 7:31624-31633. [41]ZhangLP, GongDL, 2018. Passive fault-tolerant control for vehicle active suspension system based on H2/H∞ approach. Journal of Vibroengineering, 20(4):1828-1849. [42]ZhouDF, YuPC, WangLC, et al., 2017. An adaptive vibration control method to suppress the vibration of the maglev train caused by track irregularities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 408:331-350. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>