Similar articles

Abstract: The dynamic behaviour of slab and ballast tracks was investigated using measurements and calculations. hammer impacts and train passages were analysed and measurements were made using geophones (velocity transducers) which had been time-integrated to displacements. The calculations were carried out in the frequency-wavenumber domain for multi-beam-on-continuous soil models. The characteristics of the different tracks and track elements were established in theory and by experiment. The frequency-dependent compliances (displacement transfer functions) showed clear rail-on-railpad resonances or highly damped track-soil resonances. Compared to the rail and sleeper, the track slab had much lower amplitudes. The slab track usually had the highest rail amplitudes due to soft railpads. train passage yielded track displacements which were a superposition of the axle loads from the two neighbouring axles of a bogie and from the two bogies of two neighbouring carriages. This global behaviour was characteristic of the track slab of the slab track, whereas the rails of the slab and the ballast tracks behaved more locally with only one bogie of influence. The measurements agreed very well with the theory of continuous soil in the case of the six measured slab tracks and acceptably well for the six measured ballast tracks. The measurements allowed us to find appropriate model parameters and to check the models. For example, the Winkler model of the soil was found to be less appropriate because it reacted more locally.

轨道-土体动态相互作用--板式轨道和有砟轨道的计算和测量

[1]Alves Costa PA, Calçada R, Cardoso AS, 2012. Track-ground vibrations induced by railway traffic: in-situ measurements and validation of a 2.5D FEM-BEM model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 32(1):111-128.

[2]Arlaud E, D’Aguiar SC, Balmes E, 2016. Receptance of railway tracks at low frequency: numerical and experimental approaches. Transportation Geotechnics, 9:1-16.

[3]Auersch L, 1994. Wave propagation in layered soils: theoretical solution in wavenumber domain and experimental results of hammer and railway traffic excitation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 173(2):233-264.

[4]Auersch L, 2005. Dynamics of the railway track and the underlying soil: the boundary-element solution, theoretical results and their experimental verification. Vehicle System Dynamics, 43(9):671-695.

[5]Auersch L, 2010. Theoretical and experimental excitation force spectra for railway-induced ground vibration: vehicle-track-soil interaction, irregularities and soil measurements. Vehicle System Dynamics, 48(2):235-261.

[6]Auersch L, 2012. Dynamic behavior of slab tracks on homogeneous and layered soils and the reduction of ground vibration by floating slab tracks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138(8):923-933.

[7]Auersch L, 2017. Static and dynamic behaviours of isolated or unisolated ballast tracks using a fast wavenumber domain method. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 87(3):555-574.

[8]Auersch L, Said S, 2015. Comparison of different dispersion evaluation methods and a case history with the inversion to a soil model, related admittance functions, and the prediction of train-induced ground vibration. Near Surface Geophysics, 13(2):127-142.

[9]Auersch L, Krylov VV, 2019. Fast trains and isolating tracks on inhomogeneous soils. In: Krylov VV (Ed.), Ground Vibrations from High-speed Railways: Prediction and Mitigation. ICE Publishing, London, UK, p.27-76.

[10]Bowness D, Lock AC, Powrie W, et al., 2007. Monitoring the dynamic displacements of railway track. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 221(1):13-22.

[11]Connolly D, Giannopoulos A, Forde MC, 2013. Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 46:13-19.

[12]de Man AP, 2002. Dynatrack: a Survey of Dynamic Railway Track Properties and Their Quality. PhD Thesis, Delft University, Delft, the Netherlands.

[13]Esveld C, 2001. Modern Railway Track, 2nd Edition. MRT-Productions, the Netherlands.

[14]Fröhling RD, 1997. Deterioration of Railway Track due to Dynamic Vehicle Loading and Spatially Varying Track Stiffness. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

[15]Fryba L, 1972. Vibrations of Structures under Moving Loads. Noordhof International Publishing, Groningen, the Netherlands.

[16]Galvín P, Domínguez J, 2009. Experimental and numerical analyses of vibrations induced by high-speed trains on the Córdoba-Málaga line. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(4):641-657.

[17]Galvín P, François S, Schevenels M, et al., 2010. A 2.5D coupled FE-BE model for the prediction of railway induced vibrations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(12):1500-1512.

[18]Jones CJC, 1994. Use of numerical models to determine the effectiveness of anti-vibration systems for railways. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 105(1):43-51.

[19]Ju SH, Lin HT, 2008. Experimentally investigating finite element accuracy for ground vibrations induced by high-speed trains. Engineering Structures, 30(3):733-746.

[20]Kaewunruen S, Remennikov AM, 2007. Field trials for dynamic characteristics of railway track and its components using impact excitation technique. NDT&E International, 40(7):510-519.

[21]Kouroussis G, Krylov VV, 2019. Predicting high-speed railway vibration using time-domain numerical engineering approaches. In: Krylov VV (Ed.), Ground Vibrations from High-speed Railways: Prediction and Mitigation. ICE Publishing, London, UK, p.187-216.

[22]Li MXD, Berggren EG, 2010. A study of the effect of global track stiffness and its variations on track performance: simulation and measurement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 224(5):375-382.

[23]Lombaert G, Degrande G, Kogut J, et al., 2006a. The experimental validation of a numerical model for the prediction of railway induced vibrations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 297(3-5):512-535.

[24]Lombaert G, Degrande G, Vanhauwere B, et al., 2006b. The control of ground-borne vibrations from railway traffic by means of continuous floating slabs. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 297(3-5):946-961.

[25]Maldonado M, 2008. Vibrations Dues au Passage d’un Tramway: Mesures Expérimentales et SIMULATIONS Numériques. PhD Thesis, École Centrale de Nantes, France (in French).

[26]Milne D, Pen LL, Thompson D, et al., 2018. Automated processing of railway track deflection signals obtained from velocity and acceleration measurements. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(8):2097-2110.

[27]Nelson JT, 1996. Recent developments in ground-borne noise and vibration control. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 193(1):367-376.

[28]Nielsen JCO, Igeland A, 1995. Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track influence of wheel and track imperfections. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 187(5):825-839.

[29]Ren JJ, Yang RS, Wang P, et al., 2017. Influence of contact loss underneath concrete underlayer on dynamic performance of prefabricated concrete slab track. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231(3):345-358.

[30]Romero A, Galvín P, Domínguez J, 2013. 3D non-linear time domain FEM-BEM approach to soil-structure interaction problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 37(3):501-512.

[31]Selig ET, Waters JM, 1994. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford, London, UK.

[32]Sheng X, Jones CJC, Petyt M, 1999. Ground vibration generated by a harmonic load acting on a railway track. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 225(14):3-28.

[33]Sheng X, Jones CJC, Thompson DJ, 2006. Prediction of ground vibration from trains using the wavenumber finite and boundary element methods. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 293(3-5):575-586.

[34]Steenbergen MJMM, Metrikine AV, Esveld C, 2007. Assessment of design parameters of a slab track railway system from a dynamic viewpoint. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 306(1-2):361-371.

[35]Takemiya H, Krylov VV, 2001. Ground vibrations alongside tracks induced by high-speed trains: prediction and mitigation. In: Krylov VV (Ed.), Noise and Vibration from High-speed Trains. Thomas Telford, London, UK, p.347-391.

[36]Takemiya H, Bian XC, 2005. Substructure simulation of inhomogeneous track and layered ground dynamic interaction under train passage. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131(7):699-711.

[37]Wolf JP, 1985. Dynamic Soil-structure Interaction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

[38]Zhu SY, Cai CB, 2014. Interface damage and its effect on vibrations of slab track under temperature and vehicle dynamic loads. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 58:222-232.

[39]Zhu SY, Wang JW, Cai CB, et al., 2017. Development of a vibration attenuation track at low frequencies for urban rail transit. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 32(9):713-726.