|
|
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
ISSN 1673-565X(Print), 1862-1775(Online), Monthly
2025 Vol.26 No.12 P.1229-1243
Preliminary study on evaluation indicators for urban engineering system sustainability
Abstract: China’s urbanization has entered a mid-to-late phase, and is characterized by high-density urban engineering projects that form systems coupled to geotechnical environments. These systems exhibit significant vulnerability due to strong spatiotemporal coupling, which hampers sustainable urban development. Traditional approaches to urban engineering design, construction, and maintenance tend to focus on individual projects and lack the ability to comprehensively evaluate system-level sustainability. Thus, with current methods, it is difficult to optimize the renewal and operation of high-density urban engineering systems. In this study, the constituent elements and key features of high-density urban engineering systems are discussed, and urban engineering system sustainability evaluation indicators are comprehensively reviewed. Viewed from perspectives of resilience, low-carbon development, and ecological impact, 66 performance indicators describing urban engineering systems are selected. The decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL)-based analytic network process (DANP) method and the entropy weight method (EWM) are utilized to calculate these indicators’ subjective and objective weights, respectively. Furthermore, the coupling relationships between evaluation indicators are explored, aiding the construction of an urban engineering sustainability evaluation index system. Finally, empirical analysis is conducted across six megacities in China (Tianjin, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Wuhan, Chongqing, and Shenzhen) to validate the effectiveness of the evaluation indicators. The findings reveal significant imbalances in the sustainability of urban engineering systems in China. Accordingly, potential strategies and indicators for targeted enhancement of these systems are discussed.
Key words: Urban engineering system; Geotechnical environment; Spatiotemporal coupling; Sustainability; Evaluation indicators
机构:1浙江大学,超重力科学与技术研究院,浙江杭州,310058;2浙江大学,软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江杭州,310058
目的:我国城市化已进入中后期阶段,高密度城市工程通过岩土环境耦联形成城市工程系统。强烈的时空耦联性导致城市工程系统服役脆弱性显著,严重削弱了城市可持续能力。本文旨在构建多维度的城市工程系统可持续性评价指标体系,研究不同子系统间的耦联关系,为高密度城市工程系统可持续运维提供量化评估工具。
创新点:1.综述城市工程系统可持续能力评价研究现状及验证方法,指出既有评价研究的不足;2.综合韧性、低碳及环保三种维度,构建包含66项指标的城市工程系统可持续性评价指标体系。
方法:1.通过文献计量与标准化筛选,基于8个城市工程子系统确定66项指标,涵盖韧性、低碳与环保维度;2.基于决策试验与评价试验法和网络分析法相结合的方法和熵权法分别确认评价指标的主、客观权重,并利用最大离差法计算指标组合权重;3.通过对国内6个超大城市的实证分析,验证所构建评价体系的合理性,并根据计算结果提出对应城市工程系统可持续能力的提升方法。
结论:1.本文构建的评价指标体系可以准确合理地量化分析各评价对象的城市工程系统可持续能力,其中,地质灾害监测能力和移动通信保障能力是影响城市工程系统可持续能力最关键的两项指标;2.所选国内超大城市的城市工程系统可持续能力综合评价呈现明显的不均衡性,且同一城市在不同维度上的表现也有明显差异。
关键词组:
References:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>
DOI:
10.1631/jzus.A2400522
CLC number:
Download Full Text:
Downloaded:
2676
Download summary:
<Click Here>Downloaded:
134Clicked:
1725
Cited:
0
On-line Access:
2026-01-12
Received:
2024-11-10
Revision Accepted:
2025-05-26
Crosschecked:
2026-01-12