|
|
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
ISSN 1673-1581(Print), 1862-1783(Online), Monthly
2018 Vol.19 No.1 P.1-5
A warning for Chinese academic evaluation systems: short-term bibliometric measures misjudge the value of pioneering contributions
Abstract: Publication citation-based research evaluation, even if only in support of peer review, is not everywhere, on every level, or for everyone suitable, because of differences in scientific research, patterns of research output, stages of scientific evolution, and merits—scientific or societal—of scientific results.
Key words: Academic evaluation; Pioneering work; Nobel Prize; Bibliometric indicator; Short-term evaluation
关键词组：
References:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>
DOI:
10.1631/jzus.B1700569
CLC number:
G353.1
Download Full Text:
Downloaded:
1629
Download summary:
<Click Here>Downloaded:
1360Clicked:
3214
Cited:
0
On-line Access:
2018-01-11
Received:
2017-11-14
Revision Accepted:
2017-12-01
Crosschecked:
2017-12-18