|
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
ISSN 1673-1581(Print), 1862-1783(Online), Monthly
2017 Vol.18 No.12 P.1055-1063
Comparison of the characteristics of macrophages derived from murine spleen, peritoneal cavity, and bone marrow
Abstract: Macrophages have a diverse set of functions based upon their activation states. The activation states, including resting (M0) and polarizing (M1 and M2) states, of macrophages derived from the mouse bone marrow, spleen, and peritoneal cavity (BMs, SPMs, and PCMs, respectively) were compared. We evaluated the macrophage yield per mouse and compared the surface markers major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II and CD86 by flow cytometry. The relative mRNA levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, mannose receptor (MR), and Ym1 in the M0, M1, and M2 states were also compared using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Bone marrow yielded the most macrophages with the best homogeneity, but they were polarized toward the M2 phenotype. All three types of macrophages had the capacity to polarize into the M1 and M2 states, but SPMs had a stronger capacity to polarize into M1. The three types of macrophages showed no differences in their capacity to polarize into the M2 state. Therefore, the three types of macrophages have distinct characteristics regardless of their resting or polarizing states. Although bone marrow can get large amounts of homogeneous macrophages, the macrophages cannot replace tissue-derived macrophages.
Key words: Macrophage; Murine splenocytes; Murine bone marrow; Peritoneal cavity
创新点:首次对比分æžè„¾è„ã€è…¹è…”和骨髓æºæ€§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžåœ¨å®‰é™ï¼ˆM0)åŠæžåŒ–状æ€ï¼ˆM1å’ŒM2)下的特å¾ã€‚
方法:通过å°é¼ 脾è„ç ”ç£¨åŠå•ç»†èƒžè´´å£èŽ·å¾—脾æºæ€§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžï¼›è…¹è…”çŒæ´—åŠç»†èƒžè´´å£èŽ·å¾—腹腔æºæ€§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžï¼›éª¨é«“è´´å£ç»†èƒžåœ¨å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžé›†è½åˆºæ¿€å› å体外刺激下培养7天获得骨髓æºæ€§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžã€‚三ç§ç»†èƒžå³ä¸ºM0型巨噬细胞,M0åœ¨å¹²æ‰°ç´ åŠè„‚多糖刺激下获得M1型巨噬细胞,M0åœ¨ç™½ä»‹ç´ 4(IL-4)刺激下获得M2型巨噬细胞。通过æµå¼ç»†èƒžä»ªåˆ†æžä¸‰ç§ç±»åž‹å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžåœ¨ä¸‰ç§çŠ¶æ€ä¸‹çš„II类主è¦ç»„织相容性å¤åˆä½“(MHC II)和CD86表达差异。通过实时è§å…‰å®šé‡èšåˆé…¶é“¾å¼å应(qPCR)检测肿瘤åæ»å› åα(TNF-α)ã€ç™½ä»‹ç´ 1β(IL-1β)ã€ç”˜éœ²ç³–å—体(MRï¼‰å’Œç±»å‡ ä¸è´¨é…¶3æ ·åˆ†å(Ym1)的表达å˜åŒ–。
结论:骨髓贴å£ç»†èƒžåŸ¹å…»èƒ½èŽ·å¾—最大é‡çš„åŒæºå·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžï¼ˆå›¾1å’Œ2),但表型åå‘于M2型巨噬细胞 (图3å’Œ4)。三ç§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžå‡èƒ½æžåŒ–为M1å’ŒM2型巨噬细胞(图5),其ä¸SPMs具有更强的M1åž‹æžåŒ–能力,而M2åž‹æžåŒ–能力之间未è§æ˜Žæ˜¾å·®å¼‚(图6)。综上所述,三ç§ç»†èƒžæ— 论在安é™åŠæžåŒ–状æ€ä¸‹å‡å…·æœ‰ä¸åŒçš„特å¾ï¼Œéª¨é«“å¯ä»¥èŽ·å¾—大é‡åŒæºæ€§å·¨å™¬ç»†èƒžï¼Œä½†æ€§è´¨ä¸åŒäºŽç»„织æºæ€§çš„脾è„和腹腔巨噬细胞。
关键è¯ç»„:
References:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>
DOI:
10.1631/jzus.B1700003
CLC number:
R392.12
Download Full Text:
Downloaded:
3504
Download summary:
<Click Here>Downloaded:
1925Clicked:
5481
Cited:
0
On-line Access:
2024-08-27
Received:
2023-10-17
Revision Accepted:
2024-05-08
Crosschecked:
2017-11-22