Similar articles

Abstract: The problem of data right confirmation is a long-term bottleneck in data sharing. Existing methods for confirming data rights lack credibility owing to poor supervision, and work only with specific data types because of their technical limitations. The emergence of blockchain is followed by some new data-sharing models that may provide improved data security. However, few of these models perform well enough in confirming data rights because the data access could not be fully under the control of the blockchain facility. In view of this, we propose a right-confirmable data-sharing model named RCDS that features symbol mapping coding (SMC) and blockchain. With SMC, each party encodes its digital identity into the byte sequence of the shared data by generating a unique symbol mapping table, whereby declaration of data rights can be content-independent for any type and any volume of data. With blockchain, all data-sharing participants jointly supervise the delivery and the access to shared data, so that granting of data rights can be openly verified. The evaluation results show that RCDS is effective and practical in data-sharing applications that are conscientious about data right confirmation.

RCDS:一种基于符号映射编码和区块链的可确权数据共享模型

[1]Ali M, Reaz R, Gouda M, 2016. Two-phase nonrepudiation protocols. Proc 7^th Int Conf on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, Article 22.

[2]Barni M, Bartolini F, 2004. Data hiding for fighting piracy. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 21(2):28-39.

[3]Baumann N, Steffen S, Bichsel B, et al., 2020. zkay v0.2: practical data privacy for smart contracts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01020

[4]Cao ZH, Zhao L, 2021. A design of key distribution mechanism in decentralized digital rights management based on blockchain and zero-knowledge proof. Proc 3^rd Int Conf on Blockchain Technology, p.53-59.

[5]Chen F, Wang JH, Li JQ, et al., 2022. TrustBuilder: a non-repudiation scheme for IoT cloud applications. Comput Secur, 116:102664.

[6]Coffey T, Saidha P, 1996. Non-repudiation with mandatory proof of receipt. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev, 26(1):6-17.

[7]Ersoy O, Genç ZA, Erkin Z, et al., 2021. Practical exchange for unique digital goods. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures, p.49-58.

[8]Frattolillo F, 2017. Digital copyright protection: focus on some relevant solutions. Int J Commun Netw Inform Secur, 9(2):282-293.

[9]Gai KK, Choo KKR, Zhu LH, 2018. Blockchain-enabled reengineering of cloud datacenters. IEEE Cloud Comput, 5(6):21-25.

[10]Ganesh SM, Pandi V, Deborah LJ, et al., 2017. Attacks on the anti-collusion data sharing scheme for dynamic groups in the cloud. Proc Int Conf on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage, p.457-467.

[11]Giacomelli I, Madsen J, Orlandi C, 2016. ZKBoo: faster zero-knowledge for Boolean circuits. Proc 25^th USENIX Conf on Security Symposium, p.1069-1083.

[12]Gong JQ, Lin SF, Li JW, 2019. Research on personal health data provenance and right confirmation with smart contract. Proc IEEE 4 ^th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conf, p.1211-1216.

[13]Huckle S, White M, 2017. Fake news: a technological approach to proving the origins of content, using blockchains. Big Data, 5(4):356-371.

[14]Kalodner H, Goldfeder S, Chen XQ, et al., 2018. Arbitrum: scalable, private smart contracts. Proc 27^th USENIX Security Symp, p.1353-1370.

[15]Kappos G, Yousaf H, Maller M, et al., 2018. An empirical analysis of anonymity in Zcash. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.03180

[16]Kosba A, Miller A, Shi E, et al., 2016. Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. Proc IEEE Symp on Security and Privacy, p.839-858.

[17]Li C, Palanisamy B, Xu RH, 2019. Scalable and privacy-preserving design of on/off-chain smart contracts. Proc 35^th Int Conf on Data Engineering Workshops, p.7-12.

[18]Lin C, Luo M, Huang XY, et al., 2022. An efficient privacy-preserving credit score system based on noninteractive zero-knowledge proof. IEEE Syst J, 16(1):1592-1601.

[19]Okonkwo IE, 2021. NFT, copyright and intellectual property commercialization. Int J Law Inform Technol, 29(4):296-304.

[20]Pan H, You XM, Liu S, et al., 2021. Pearson correlation coefficient-based pheromone refactoring mechanism for multi-colony ant colony optimization. Appl Intell, 51(2):752-774.

[21]Parno B, Howell J, Gentry C, et al., 2016. Pinocchio: nearly practical verifiable computation. Commun ACM, 59(2):103-112.

[22]Qian P, Liu ZG, Wang X, et al., 2019. Digital resource rights confirmation and infringement tracking based on smart contracts. Proc 6^th Int Conf on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, p.62-67.

[23]Saini A, Zhu QY, Singh N, et al., 2021. A smart-contract-based access control framework for cloud smart healthcare system. IEEE Int Things J, 8(7):5914-5925.

[24]Sifah EB, Xia Q, Xia H, et al., 2021. Selective sharing of outsourced encrypted data in cloud environments. IEEE Int Things J, 8(18):14141-14155.

[25]Steffen S, Bichsel B, Gersbach M, et al., 2019. zkay: specifying and enforcing data privacy in smart contracts. Proc ACM SIGSAC Conf on Computer and Communications Security, p.1759-1776.

[26]Sun XQ, Yu FR, Zhang P, et al., 2021. A survey on zero-knowledge proof in blockchain. IEEE Netw, 35(4):198-205.

[27]Wang HL, Tian YL, Yin X, 2018. Blockchain-based big data right confirmation scheme. Comput Sci, 45(2):15-19, 24 (in Chinese).

[28]Wang L, Liu JY, Liu WY, et al., 2020. Blockchain-based diversion-point system for balancing customer flow in shopping mall. Symmetry, 12(12):1946.

[29]Wang L, Liu JY, Liu WY, 2021. Staged data delivery protocol: a blockchain-based two-stage protocol for non-repudiation data delivery. Concurr Comput Pract Exp, 33(13):e6240.

[30]Wang L, Li J, Zuo LN, et al., 2022. T-tracer: a blockchain-aided symbol mapping watermarking scheme for traitor tracing in non-repudiation data delivery. Proc 4^th ACM Int Symp on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure, p.23-34.

[31]Wang S, Yang M, Ge TJ, et al., 2022. BBS: a blockchain big-data sharing system. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Communications, p.4205-4210.

[32]Wu ZD, 2009. A Multimedia Query Language and its Query Processing. PhD Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (in Chinese).

[33]Yan Y, Wei CZ, Guo XP, et al., 2020. Confidentiality support over financial grade consortium blockchain. Proc ACM SIGMOD Int Conf on Management of Data, p.2227-2240.

[34]Zaghloul E, Zhou K, Ren J, 2020. P-MOD: secure privilege-based multilevel organizational data-sharing in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Big Data, 6(4):804-815.

[35]Zha C, Yin H, Yin B, 2020. Data ownership confirmation and privacy-free search for blockchain-based medical data sharing. Proc 2^nd Int Conf on Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems, p.619-632.

[36]Zhang LY, Zheng YF, Weng J, et al., 2020. You can access but you cannot leak: defending against illegal content redistribution in encrypted cloud media center. IEEE Trans Depend Secur Comput, 17(6):1218-1231.

[37]Zhang R, Zhang L, Choo KKR, et al., 2023. Dynamic authenticated asymmetric group key agreement with sender non-repudiation and privacy for group-oriented applications. IEEE Trans Depend Secur Comput, 20(1):492-505.

[38]Zhao WB, Jiang CF, Gao HH, et al., 2021. Blockchain-enabled cyber-physical systems: a review. IEEE Int Things J, 8(6):4023-4034.

[39]Zhu LH, Wu YL, Gai KK, et al., 2019. Controllable and trustworthy blockchain-based cloud data management. Fut Gener Comput Syst, 91:527-535.

[40]Zhu ZM, Jiang R, 2016. A secure anti-collusion data sharing scheme for dynamic groups in the cloud. IEEE Trans Parall Distr Syst, 27(1):40-50.