CLC number: TP79; TK51
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2012-07-11
Cited: 8
Clicked: 5109
Muhammad Ali Shamim, Renji Remesan, Da-wei Han, Naeem Ejaz, Ayub Elahi. An improved technique for global daily sunshine duration estimation using satellite imagery[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2012, 13(9): 717-722.
@article{title="An improved technique for global daily sunshine duration estimation using satellite imagery",
author="Muhammad Ali Shamim, Renji Remesan, Da-wei Han, Naeem Ejaz, Ayub Elahi",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="13",
number="9",
pages="717-722",
year="2012",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1100292"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T An improved technique for global daily sunshine duration estimation using satellite imagery
%A Muhammad Ali Shamim
%A Renji Remesan
%A Da-wei Han
%A Naeem Ejaz
%A Ayub Elahi
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 13
%N 9
%P 717-722
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2012
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1100292
TY - JOUR
T1 - An improved technique for global daily sunshine duration estimation using satellite imagery
A1 - Muhammad Ali Shamim
A1 - Renji Remesan
A1 - Da-wei Han
A1 - Naeem Ejaz
A1 - Ayub Elahi
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 13
IS - 9
SP - 717
EP - 722
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2012
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1100292
Abstract: This paper presents an improved model for global sunshine duration estimation. The methodology incorporates geostationary satellite images by including snow cover information, sun and satellite angles and a trend correction factor for seasons, for the determination of cloud cover index. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology has been tested using Meteosat geostationary satellite images in the visible band with a temporal resolution of 1 h and spatial resolution of 2.5 km×2.5 km, for the Brue Catchment in the southwest of England. Validation results show a significant improvement in the estimation of global sunshine duration by the proposed method as compared to its predecessor (R2 is improved from 0.68 to 0.83, root mean squared error (RMSE) from 2.37 h/d to 1.19 h/d and the mean biased error (MBE) from 0.21 h/d to 0.08 h/d). Further studies are needed to test this method in other parts of the world with different climate and geographical conditions.
[1]Almorox, J., Hontoria, C., 2004. Global solar radiation estimation using sunshine duration in Spain. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(9-10):1529-1535.
[2]Angström, A., 1924. Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 50(210):121-125.
[3]Cano, D., Monget, J.M., Albuissan, M., Guillard, H., Regas, N., Wald, L., 1986. A method for the determination of the global solar radiation from meteorological satellite data. Solar Energy, 37(1):31-39.
[4]El-Metwally, M., 2005. Sunshine and global solar radiation estimation at different sites in Egypt. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar Terrestrial Physics, 67(14):1331-1342.
[5]FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization), 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.
[6]Ineichen, P., Perez, R., 2002. A new air mass independent formulation for the Linke turbidity coefficient. Solar Energy, 73(3):151-157.
[7]Jervase, J.A., Al-Lawati, A., Dorvlo, A.S.S., 2003. Contour maps for sunshine ratio for Oman using radial basis function generated data. Renewable Energy, 28(3):487- 497.
[8]Kandirmaz, H.M., 2006. A model for the estimation of daily global sunshine duration from meteorological geostationary satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(22):5061-5071.
[9]Kandirmaz, H.M., Yengi Ngil, L., Pestemalci, V., Emrahoglu, N., 2004. Daily global solar radiation mapping of Turkey using Meteosat satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(11):2159-2168.
[10]Kimball, H.H., 1919. Variations in the total and luminous solar radiation with geographical position in the United States. Monthly Weather Review, 47(11):769-793.
[11]Li, H., Ma, W., Lian, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, L., 2011. Global solar radiation estimation with sunshine duration in Tibet China. Renewable Energy, 36(11):3141-3145.
[12]Moradi, I., 2009. Quality control of global solar radiation using sunshine duration hours. Energy, 34(1):1-6.
[13]Perez, R., Ineichen, P., Moore, K., Kmiecik, M., Chain, C., George, R., Vigonla, F., 2002. A new operational model for satellite derived irradiances: description and validation. Solar Energy, 73(5):307-317.
[14]Sahin, A.D., 2007. A new formulation for solar irradiation and sunshine duration estimation. International Journal of Energy Research, 31(2):109-118.
[15]Trnka, T., Žalud, Z., Eitzenger, J., Dubrovskŷ, M., 2005. Global solar radiation in Central European lowlands estimated by various empirical formulae. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 131(1-2):54-76.
[16]Zeng, Y., Qiu, X.F., Miao, O.L., Liu, C.M., 2003. Distribution of possible sunshine durations over rugged terrains of China. Progress in Natural Science, 13(10):761-764.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>