Full Text:   <1170>

Summary:  <1503>

CLC number: F291.1

On-line Access: 2017-09-08

Received: 2015-07-21

Revision Accepted: 2016-11-10

Crosschecked: 2017-08-01

Cited: 1

Clicked: 5423

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2017 Vol.18 No.8 P.1033-1039


Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development

Author(s):  Shih-kung Lai, Jhong-you Huang

Affiliation(s):  College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   lai@tongji.edu.cn, jhongyouhuang@gmail.com

Key Words:  Decision making, Linked decisions, Decision network, Planning

Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Shih-kung Lai, Jhong-you Huang. Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2017, 18(8): 1033-1039.

@article{title="Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development",
author="Shih-kung Lai, Jhong-you Huang",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development
%A Shih-kung Lai
%A Jhong-you Huang
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 18
%N 8
%P 1033-1039
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2017
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1510000

T1 - Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development
A1 - Shih-kung Lai
A1 - Jhong-you Huang
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 18
IS - 8
SP - 1033
EP - 1039
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2017
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1510000

planning problems are challenging and complex in that they usually involve multiple stakeholders with multi-attribute preferences. Thus few, if any, planning tools are useful in helping planners address such problems. Decision analysis is less useful than expected in dealing with planning problems because it focuses overwhelmingly on making a single decision for a particular decision-maker. In this paper, we describe the theoretical foundation of a planning tool called the ‘decision network’, which aims to help planners make multiple and linked decisions when facing multiple stakeholders with multi-attribute preferences. The research provides a starting point for a fully fledged technology that is useful for dealing with complex planning problems. We first provide a general formulation of the planning problem that the decision network intends to address. We then introduce an efficient solution algorithm for this problem, with a numerical example to demonstrate how the algorithm works. The proposed solution algorithm is efficient, allowing computerization of the planning tool. We also demonstrate that the diagrammatic representation of the decision network is more efficient than that of a decision tree. Therefore, when dealing with challenging and complex planning problems, using the decision network to make multiple and linked decisions may yield more benefits than making such decisions independently.

This article has been corrected, see doi:10.1631/FITEE.15e0000




Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P., 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Q., 17(1): 1-25.

[2]Friend, J.K., Hickling, A., 2005. Planning under Pressure: the Strategic Choice Approach. Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK.

[3]Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P., 2004. Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Elsevier, San Francisco, USA.

[4]Han, H.Y., Lai, S.K., 2011. Decision network: a planning tool for making multiple, linked decisions. Environ. Plan. B, 38(1):115-128.

[5]Han, H.Y., Lai, S.K., 2012. Reformulation and assessment of the inventory approach to urban growth boundaries. Land Use Pol., 29(2):351-356.

[6]Hopkins, L.D., 1984. Evaluation of methods for exploring ill-defined problems. Environ. Plan. B, 11(3):339-348.

[7]Hopkins, L.D., 2001. Urban Development: the Logic of Making Plans. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.

[8]Keeney, R.L., 2004. Making better decision-makers. Dec. Anal., 1(4):193-204.

[9]Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[10]Kirkwood, C.W., 1993. An algebraic approach to formulating and solving large models for sequential decisions under uncertainty. Manag. Sci., 39(7):900-913.

[12]Kirkwood, C.W., 1996. Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, USA.

[13]Lai, S.K., 2006. A spatial garbage-can model. Environ. Plan. B, 33(1):141-156.

[14]Pollock, J.L., 2006. Thinking about Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2022 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE