Full Text:   <376>

Summary:  <36>

Suppl. Mater.: 

CLC number: TP242.2

On-line Access: 2023-02-27

Received: 2022-04-27

Revision Accepted: 2023-02-27

Crosschecked: 2022-09-04

Cited: 0

Clicked: 322

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Ziwei WAN


Chunlin ZHOU


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2023 Vol.24 No.2 P.217-230


Development of an onsite calibration device forrobot manipulators

Author(s):  Ziwei WAN, Chunlin ZHOU, Haotian ZHANG, Jun WU

Affiliation(s):  College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310063, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   wanzw@zju.edu.cn, c_zhou@zju.edu.cn, zhanghtpex@163.com, junwuapc@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Calibration device, Kinematic calibration, Onsite calibration, Absolute accuracy

Ziwei WAN, Chunlin ZHOU, Haotian ZHANG, Jun WU. Development of an onsite calibration device forrobot manipulators[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2023, 24(2): 217-230.

@article{title="Development of an onsite calibration device forrobot manipulators",
author="Ziwei WAN, Chunlin ZHOU, Haotian ZHANG, Jun WU",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Development of an onsite calibration device forrobot manipulators
%A Ziwei WAN
%A Chunlin ZHOU
%A Haotian ZHANG
%A Jun WU
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 24
%N 2
%P 217-230
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2023
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.2200172

T1 - Development of an onsite calibration device forrobot manipulators
A1 - Ziwei WAN
A1 - Chunlin ZHOU
A1 - Haotian ZHANG
A1 - Jun WU
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 24
IS - 2
SP - 217
EP - 230
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2023
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.2200172

A novel in-contact three-dimensional (3D) measuring device, called MultiCal, is proposed as a convenient, low-cost (less than US$5000), and robust facility for onsite kinematic calibration and online measurement of robot manipulator accuracy. The device has -level accuracy and can be easily embedded in robot cells. During the calibration procedure, the robot manipulator first moves automatically to multiple end-effector orientations with its tool center point (TCP) constrained on a fixed point by a 3D displacement measuring device (single point constraint), and the corresponding joint angles are recorded. Then, the measuring device is precisely mounted at different positions using a well-designed fixture, and the above measurement process is repeated to implement a multi-point constraint. The relative mounting positions are accurately measured and used as prior information to improve calibration accuracy and robustness. The results of theoretical analysis indicate that MultiCal reduces calibration accuracy by 10% to 20% in contrast to traditional non-contact 3D or six-dimensional (6D) measuring devices (such as laser trackers) when subject to the same level of artificial measurement noise. The results of a calibration experiment conducted on a Staubli TX90 robot show that MultiCal has only 7% to 14% lower calibration accuracy compared to a measuring arm with a laser scanner, and 21% to 30% lower time efficiency compared to a 6D binocular vision measuring system, yielding maximum and mean absolute position errors of 0.831 and 0.339, respectively.


摘要:提出一种名为MultiCal的新型接触式三维测量装置,可用于机械臂的现场标定和在线精度测量,具有使用方便、成本低(低于5000美元)、性能可靠等优点。该设备可灵活地设置在机械臂的工作环境中进行微米级精度三维测量。在标定过程中,通过一个三维位移测量装置,让机械臂的工具中心点运动至一个固定点,之后再绕该点旋转运动至不同姿态角并测量各关节角度(单点约束测量)。然后采用一个创新设计的夹具,将三维位移测量装置精确地安装在该夹具的不同工位上,并重复上述测量过程,从而实现多点约束测量。夹具上不同工位的相对位置在标定前已被精确测量,并作为标定的先验信息,以提高标定的精度与鲁棒性。理论分析表明,在相同水平的测量误差下,MultiCal的理论标定精度与传统的非接触式三维或六维测量设备(如激光跟踪器)相比降低10%-20%。而在Staubli TX90机械臂上进行的实际标定实验结果表明,MultiCal实际标定精度仅比带激光扫描仪的测量臂低7%-14%,时间效率比六维双目视觉测量系统低21%-30%,标定后的机械臂的最大和平均绝对定位误差分别为0.831 mm和0.339 mm。


Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Castro HFF, Burdekin M, 2006. Calibration system based on a laser interferometer for kinematic accuracy assessment on machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 46(2):89-97.

[2]Chen M, Hong X, Wei LS, et al., 2020. Robotic arm calibration and teaching method based on binocular vision. Proc 39th Chinese Control Conf, p.5963-5969.

[3]Cho Y, Do HM, Cheong J, 2019. Screw based kinematic calibration method for robot manipulators with joint compliance using circular point analysis. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, 60:63-76.

[4]Cong DC, Yu DY, Han JW, 2006. Kinematic calibration of parallel robots using CMM. Proc 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, p.8514-8518.

[5]Enebuse I, Foo M, Ibrahim BSKK, et al., 2021. A comparative review of hand-eye calibration techniques for vision guided robots. IEEE Access, 9:113143-113155.

[6]Feng CS, Cong S, Shang WW, 2009. Integrated kinematic calibration for all the parameters of a planar 2DOF redundantly actuated parallel manipulator. J Mech Robot, 1(3):403-421.

[7]Gaudreault M, Joubair A, Bonev IA, 2016. Local and closed-loop calibration of an industrial serial robot using a new low-cost 3D measuring device. IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, p.4312-4319.

[8]Guo YX, Song B, Tang XQ, et al., 2020. A measurement method for calibrating kinematic parameters of industrial robots with point constraint by a laser displacement sensor. Meas Sci Technol, 31(7):075004.

[9]Hayati S, Mirmirani M, 1985. Improving the absolute positioning accuracy of robot manipulators. J Robot Syst, 2(4):397-413.

[10]Icli C, Stepanenko O, Bonev I, 2020. New method and portable measurement device for the calibration of industrial robots. Sensors, 20(20):5919.

[11]Ikits M, Hollerbach JM, 1997. Kinematic calibration using a plane constraint. Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, p.3191-3196.

[12]ISO, 1998. Manipulating Industrial Robots—Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods. ISO 9283:1998. International Organization for Standardization.

[13]Joubair A, Bonev IA, 2015. Kinematic calibration of a six-axis serial robot using distance and sphere constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 77(1-4):515-523.

[14]Joubair A, Nubiola A, Bonev I, 2013. Calibration efficiency analysis based on five observability indices and two calibration models for a six-axis industrial robot. SAE Int J Aerosp, 6(1):161-168.

[15]Legnani G, Tiboni M, 2014. Optimal design and application of a low-cost wire-sensor system for the kinematic calibration of industrial manipulators. Mech Mach Theory, 73:25-48.

[16]Li BC, Shen J, 1991. Constrained optimization approach to the estimation of rotation matrix. Robot, 13(3):1-5 (in Chinese).

[17]Luo GY, Zou L, Wang ZL, et al., 2021. A novel kinematic parameters calibration method for industrial robot based on Levenberg-Marquardt and differential evolution hybrid algorithm. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, 71:102165.

[18]Mitchell TJ, 1974. An algorithm for the construction of “D-Optimal” experimental designs. Technometrics, 16(2):203-210.

[19]Nubiola A, Slamani M, Joubair A, et al., 2014. Comparison of two calibration methods for a small industrial robot based on an optical CMM and a laser tracker. Robotica, 32(3):447-466.

[20]Park FC, Okamura K, 1994. Kinematic calibration and the product of exponentials formula. In: Lenarčič J, Ravani B (Eds.), Advances in Robot Kinematics and Computational Geometry. Springer, Dordrecht, p.119-128.

[21]Qiao GX, Weiss BA, 2017. Accuracy degradation analysis for industrial robot systems. Proc ASME 12th Int Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conf Collocated with the JSME/ASME 6th Int Conf on Materials and Processing, Article V003T04A006. doi:

[22]Sun T, Zhai YP, Song YM, et al., 2016. Kinematic calibration of a 3-DoF rotational parallel manipulator using laser tracker. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf, 41:78-91.

[23]Sun T, Liu CY, Lian BB, et al., 2020. Calibration for precision kinematic control of an articulated serial robot. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 68(7):6000-6009.

[24]Sun Y, Hollerbach JM, 2008. Observability index selection for robot calibration. IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, p.831-836.

[25]Zhan YB, 2015. Development of a Wire Draw Encoder Based Measurement System for Robot Calibration. MS Thesis, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China. doi:

[26]Zhong XL, Lewis JM, Francis LNN, 1996. Autonomous robot calibration using a trigger probe. Robot Auton Syst, 18(4):395-410.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE