Similar articles

Abstract: Objectives: to verify the feasibility and reliability of the electronic version of Chinese SF-36 based on the Quality-of-Life-Recorder. Design: A crossover randomized controlled trial, comparing a paper-based and an electronic version of the Chinese SF-36, was conducted. According to generated random numbers, interviewees were asked to fill out either the electronic version or the paper version first. The second version was filled in after a pause of at least 10 min. Settings and participants: One group of 100 medical students at the School of Medicine of Zhejiang University and the other group of 50 outpatients at a clinic for general practice in Hangzhou City (China) were eventually recruited in this study. Results: The acceptance of the electronic version was good (60% of medical students and 84% of outpatients preferred the electronic version). At the level of eight-scale scores, the mean-difference for each scale (except for general health) between the two versions was less than 5%. At the level of 36 questions, the percentage of “exact agreement” ranged within 64%~99%; the percentage of “global agreement” ranged within 72%~99%; 77% of the kappa coefficients demonstrated “good/excellent agreement” and 23% of the kappa coefficients demonstrated “medium agreement”. Conclusion: This study, for the first time, can provide empirical basis for the confirmation of the feasibility and reliability of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36 and may provide an impulse towards widespread deployment of the Quality-of-Life-Recorder in Chinese populations.

[1] Caro Sr, J.J., Caro, I., Caro, J., Wouters, F., Juniper, E.F., 2001. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Qual. Life Res., 10(8):683-691.

[2] Drummond, H.E., Ghosh, S., Ferguson, A., Brackenridge, D., Tiplady, B., 1995. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual. Life Res., 4(1):21-26.

[3] Holch, S., 2000. Practical Aspects of Standard Measurement of Quality-of-Life for In-Patient with an Electronic Quality-of-Life-Recorder. M.D. Thesis, University of ULM (in German).

[4] Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1):159-174.

[5] Li, L., Wang, H.M., Shen, Y., 2003. Chinese SF-36 health survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 57(4):259-263.

[6] Ryan, J.M., Corry, J.R., Attewell, R., Smithson, M.J., 2002. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version. Qual. Life Res., 11(1):19-26.

[7] Sigle, J., 1994. Quality of Life: Computer Assistant Measurement of Quality of Life. QL-Recorder Software Manual. Kunstvolle EDV & Elektronik (in German).

[8] Sigle, J., 1995. Practical Aspects of Quality-of-Life Measure: Standard Measurement of Quality-of-Life for Out-Patients with an Electronic Quality-of-Life-Recorder. M.D. Thesis, University of ULM (in German).

[9] Sigle, J., Porzsolt, F., 1996. Practical aspects of quality-of-life measurement: design and feasibility study of the quality-of-life recorder and the standardized measurement of quality of life in an out-patient clinic. Cancer Treat. Rev., 22(Suppl. A):75-89.

[10] Velikova, G., Wright, E.P., Smith, A.B., Cull, A., Gould, A., Forman, D., Perren, T., Stead, M., Brown, J., Selby, P.J., 1999. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J. Clin. Oncol., 17(3):998-1007.

[11] Ware, J.E., Sherbourne, C.D., 1992. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care, 30(6):473-483.

[12] Wilson, A.S., Kitas, G.D., Carruthers, D.M., Reay, C., Skan, J., Harris, S., Treharne, G.J., Young, S.P., Bacon, P.A., 2002. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology, 41(3):268-273.