CLC number: TV31
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2018-03-07
Cited: 0
Clicked: 6431
Fei Wang, Deng-hua Zhong, Yu-ling Yan, Bing-yu Ren, Bin-ping Wu. Rockfill dam compaction quality evaluation based on cloud-fuzzy model[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2018, 19(4): 289-303.
@article{title="Rockfill dam compaction quality evaluation based on cloud-fuzzy model",
author="Fei Wang, Deng-hua Zhong, Yu-ling Yan, Bing-yu Ren, Bin-ping Wu",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="19",
number="4",
pages="289-303",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1600753"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Rockfill dam compaction quality evaluation based on cloud-fuzzy model
%A Fei Wang
%A Deng-hua Zhong
%A Yu-ling Yan
%A Bing-yu Ren
%A Bin-ping Wu
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 19
%N 4
%P 289-303
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1600753
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rockfill dam compaction quality evaluation based on cloud-fuzzy model
A1 - Fei Wang
A1 - Deng-hua Zhong
A1 - Yu-ling Yan
A1 - Bing-yu Ren
A1 - Bin-ping Wu
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 19
IS - 4
SP - 289
EP - 303
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1600753
Abstract: The quality of compaction is key to the safety of dam construction and operation. However, because of incomplete information about the construction process and the unknown relationship between compaction quality and the factors that influence it, traditional evaluation methods such as neural networks and multivariate linear regression models fail to take uncertainty fully into account. This paper proposes a cloud-fuzzy method for assessing compaction quality by considering randomness, fuzziness, and incomplete information. The compaction parameters and material source parameters are the key parameters in the assessment of compaction quality. A five-layer neural-network model of compaction quality assessment is established that considers compacted dry density and its classification membership and probability as the criteria, and the rolling speed, rolling passes, and compacted layer thickness as alternatives. Because of uncertainties in the criteria and alternatives, the cloud-fuzzy method, in which a fuzzy neural network is extended with a cloud model to handle uncertain and fuzzy problems more effectively, is introduced to determine the compaction quality. A case study is presented to evaluate the compaction quality of a hydropower project in China. The results indicate that the cloud-fuzzy model is feasible in relation to precision and makes up for the sole focus on precision by traditional methods. The proposed method provides a triple index for understanding compaction quality, which facilitates assessment of the compaction quality of an entire dam surface.
This manuscript proposed a cloud-fuzzy evaluation method to assess the compaction quality of rock-fill dam by taking into randomness, fuzziness and incomplete information into consideration. Compared to other traditional method, this proposed method provided a triple index to understand and evaluate the compaction quality. The results can be of great useful for rock-fill dam compaction quality evaluation.
[1]Anderegg R, Kaufmann K, 2004. Intelligent compaction with vibratory rollers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1868(1):124-134.
[2]Anderegg R, von Felten DA, Kaufmann K, 2006. Compaction monitoring using intelligent soil compactors. Proceedings of the GeoCongress 2006: Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age, p.41-46.
[3]Bas MC, Ortiz J, Ballesteros L, et al., 2017. Evaluation of a multiple linear regression model and SARIMA model in forecasting 7Be air concentrations. Chemosphere, 177: 326-333.
[4]Fu B, Li DG, Wang MK, 2011. Review and prospect on research of cloud model. Application Research of Computers, 28(2):420-426 (in Chinese).
[5]Kaufmann K, Anderegg R, 2008. 3D-construction applications III: GPS-based compaction technology. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Machine Control & Guidance, p.1-10.
[6]Komandi G, 1999. An evaluation of the concept of rolling resistance. Journal of Terramechanics, 36(3):159-166.
[7]Li DR, Wang SL, Li DY, 2006. The Theory of Space Data Dating and Application. Science Press, Beijing, China, p.330-331 (in Chinese).
[8]Li DY, Du Y, 2014. Artificial Intelligence with Uncertainty. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, p.105-106 (in Chinese).
[9]Liu DH, Wang GF, 2014. Compaction quality evaluation of the entire rolled unit of earth dam based on real-time monitoring. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 41(6):720-726 (in Chinese).
[10]Liu DH, Sun J, Zhong DH, et al., 2012. Compaction quality control of earth-rock dam construction using real-time field operation data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(9):1085-1094.
[11]Mao YY, Zhang XG, Wang LS, 2006. Fuzzy pattern recognition method for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution in the Zhangji area. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 7(11):1917-1922.
[12]Mirinejad H, Inanc T, 2017. An RBF collocation method for solving optimal control problems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87:219-225.
[13]Mooney MA, Rinehart RV, 2007. Field monitoring of roller vibration during compaction of subgrade soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(3):257-265.
[14]Qin K, Wang P, 2008. New method of curve fitting based on cloud transform. Computer Engineering and Applications, 44(23):56-58 (in Chinese).
[15]Rinehart RV, Mooney MA, 2008. Instrumentation of a roller compactor to monitor vibration behavior during earthwork compaction. Automation in Construction, 17(2):144-150.
[16]Sandstrom A, Pettersson JC, 2004. Intelligent systems for QA/QC in soil compaction. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, p.1-17.
[17]Song JJ, Du XP, Wang Q, et al., 2011. A method of multi-attribute synthetic evaluation based on cloud model. Key Engineering Materials, 480-481:805-809.
[18]Wang DY, Luo HY, Grunder O, et al., 2017. Multi-step ahead electricity price forecasting using a hybrid model based on two-layer decomposition technique and BP neural network optimized by firefly algorithm. Applied Energy, 190:390-407.
[19]Wang GY, Xu CL, 2012. Cloud model–a bidirectional cognition model between concept’s extension and intension. International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA 2012), p.391-400.
[20]Wang GY, Xu CL, Li DY, 2014. Generic normal cloud model. Information Sciences, 280:1-15.
[21]Wang R, Zhong DH, Wu BP, et al., 2015. Compaction quality evaluation of rockfill dam based on compaction and material parameters. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 34(9):146-152 (in Chinese).
[22]Wang XL, Zhou L, Ren BY, et al., 2015. Dual evaluation on rolling compaction quality of rock-fill dam based on real-time monitoring. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 34(2):164-170 (in Chinese).
[23]White DJ, Rupnow TD, Ceylan H, 2004. Influence of subgrade/subbase non-uniformity on PCC pavement performance. GeoTrans 2004-Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects, p.1058-1065.
[24]Zeng QH, Liu Y, Zhao HT, et al., 2017. Comparison of models for predicting the changes in phytoplankton community composition in the receiving water system of an inter-basin water transfer project. Environmental Pollution, 223:676-684.
[25]Zhong DH, Cui B, Liu DH, 2009. Theoretical research on construction quality real-time monitoring and system integration of core rock-fill dam. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(11):3406-3412.
[26]Zhong DH, Liu DH, Cui B, 2011. Real-time compaction quality monitoring of high core rockfill dam. Science China Technological Sciences, 54(7):1906-1913.
[27]Zhong DH, Hu W, Wu BP, et al., 2017. Dynamic time-cost-quality tradeoff of rockfill dam construction based on real-time monitoring. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(1):1-19.
[28]Zhu Q, Xu X, Gao CH, et al., 2015. Qualitative and quantitative uncertainties in regional rainfall frequency analysis. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 16(3):194-203.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>