Full Text:   <2373>

Summary:  <1478>

CLC number: U8; TU43

On-line Access: 2021-06-16

Received: 2020-08-23

Revision Accepted: 2021-01-22

Crosschecked: 2021-08-24

Cited: 0

Clicked: 3955

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Qian Dong


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2021 Vol.22 No.9 P.736-750


Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity

Author(s):  Qian Dong, Jian-hua Wang, Xian-min Zhang, Hao Wang, Jing-nan Zhao

Affiliation(s):  School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China,; more

Corresponding email(s):   tdwjh@tju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Airport pavement, Non-destructive test, Aircraft-pavement coupling, Fundamental frequency, Acceleration, Finite element model

Qian Dong, Jian-hua Wang, Xian-min Zhang, Hao Wang, Jing-nan Zhao. Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2021, 22(9): 736-750.

@article{title="Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity",
author="Qian Dong, Jian-hua Wang, Xian-min Zhang, Hao Wang, Jing-nan Zhao",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity
%A Qian Dong
%A Jian-hua Wang
%A Xian-min Zhang
%A Hao Wang
%A Jing-nan Zhao
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 22
%N 9
%P 736-750
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2021
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2000378

T1 - Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity
A1 - Qian Dong
A1 - Jian-hua Wang
A1 - Xian-min Zhang
A1 - Hao Wang
A1 - Jing-nan Zhao
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 22
IS - 9
SP - 736
EP - 750
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2021
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2000378

In this paper, we propose a new method to analyze airport pavement bearing capacity using vibration in runways during aircraft taxiing. The new method overcomes shortcomings of existing tests, such as flight suspension and simulated loading. Between aircraft take-off and landing, acceleration sensors are arranged on the surface of the pavement far from the centerline, and the in-situ responses of the pavement under aircraft loads are collected during aircraft operations. The fundamental frequencies of the pavement are obtained by fast Fourier transformation of the measured accelerations, and are used to modify the parameters of a pavement finite element model built according to a design blueprint. By comparing the fundamental frequencies of the measured and calculated signals, the soil modulus is back-calculated. To implement this test method and ensure the accuracy of bearing capacity evaluation, aircraft dynamic loads are obtained by solving dynamic balance equations of the aircraft-pavement coupled system, and the vibration response of the pavement and sensitivity analysis of the fundamental frequencies are introduced. The results show that the fundamental frequencies at the center of the pavement are basically the same as those at the far side on the cross section; the fundamental frequencies in the depth direction remain constant, but the amplitude of the frequency spectrum decreases. The effect of the soil resilient modulus on the vibration frequency is most significant. The fundamental frequency increases from 6.02 to 10.55 Hz when the soil dynamic resilient modulus changes from 91 to 303 MPa. The effects of surface thickness and base thickness on the vibration frequency are less significant, and there is minimal influence when changing the dynamic elastic moduli of the surface layer or base layer. Field test results indicate the efficacy of the method of vibration measurement at the pavement surface to estimate the layer modulus of airport pavement.


创新点:1. 根据飞机的真实运营情况,考虑升力的影响,确定了飞机的随机动荷载;2. 分析了道面全宽度及11 m深度内的振动响应,确定了振动响应变化规律以及对振动基频影响最为显著的因素.
方法:1. 通过理论推导,建立飞机-道面系统平衡方程;考虑升力的作用,并结合边界条件,求解飞机的动荷载.2. 通过仿真模拟,分析了全部道面范围内振动基频的变化规律及道面远端振动基频的影响因素.3. 通过现场测试,验证测试方法的有效性和可行性.
结论:1. 当飞机的滑行速度超过15 m/s时,在升力的影响下,飞机的随机动荷载随着飞机滑行速度的增加持续下降;当飞机的滑行速度固定时,随着道面平整度变差,动荷载增大.2. 沿横断面方向,道面中心处的振动基频仅比远端大2%;从面层至土基,振动基频不变,仅振幅逐渐减小.3. 土基动回弹模量对道面远端振动基频的影响最为显著,可达43%左右,其次是面层厚度与基层厚度,而面层弹性模量与基层回弹模量对振动基频的影响最小.


Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2012. Standard Specification for Classification of Soil and Soil Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes, AASHTO Designation: M 145-91 (2012). AASHTO, USA.

[2]Al-Qadi IL, Wang H, 2012. Impact of wide-base tires on pavements: results from instrumentation measurements and modeling analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2304(1):169-176.

[3]Al-Qadi IL, Loulizi A, Elseifi M, et al., 2004. The Virginia smart road: the impact of pavement instrumentation on understanding pavement performance. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 73:427-465.

[4]Al-Qadi IL, Portas S, Coni M, et al., 2010. Runway instrumentation and response measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153(1):162-169.

[5]Bazi G, Saboundjian S, Ullidtz P, et al., 2020. Performance of an airfield flexible pavement and a novel PCN determination method. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 146(1):04020002.

[6]CAAC (Civil Aviation Administration of China), 2009. Technical Specifications of Aerodrome Pavement Evaluation and Management, MH/T5024-2009. CAAC, China (in Chinese).

[7]CAAC (Civil Aviation Administration of China), 2010. Specifications for Airports Cement Concrete Pavement Design, MH/T5004-2010. CAAC, China (in Chinese).

[8]Fileccia Scimemi G, Turetta T, Celauro C, 2016. Backcalculation of airport pavement moduli and thickness using the Lévy ant colony optimization algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 119:288-295.

[9]Hamim A, Yusoff NIM, Ceylan H, et al., 2018. Comparative study on using static and dynamic finite element models to develop FWD measurement on flexible pavement structures. Construction and Building Materials, 176: 583-592.

[10]Irwin LN, 1977. Determination of pavement layer moduli from surface deflection data for pavement performance evaluation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, p.831-840.

[11]Jiang YZ, Wu PB, Zeng J, et al., 2021. Simplified and relatively precise back-calculation method for the pavement excitation of the monorail. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22(4):480-497.

[12]Jie L, Zheng L, Yao HL, et al., 2017. Evaluation of additional dynamic load generated by pavement unevenness using a vehicle-road coupled model. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 5(6):597-604.

[13]Khan ZH, Tarefder RA, Hasan MA, 2020. Field characterization of pavement materials using falling weight deflectometer and sensor data from an instrumented pavement section. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(4):205-221.

[14]Levenberg E, 2012. Inferring pavement properties using an embedded accelerometer. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 1(3):229-246.

[15]Li MY, Wang H, 2018. Prediction of asphalt pavement responses from FWD surface deflections using soft computing methods. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144(2):04018014.

[16]Li MY, Wang H, 2019. Development of ANN-GA program for backcalculation of pavement moduli under FWD testing with viscoelastic and nonlinear parameters. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20(4):490-498.

[17]Li Y, Howcroft C, Neild SA, et al., 2017. Using continuation analysis to identify shimmy-suppression devices for an aircraft main landing gear. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 408:234-251.

[18]Li Y, Ma XL, Zhang W, et al., 2018. Updating time-variant dimension for complex traffic flows in analysis of vehicle–bridge dynamic interaction. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 31(4):04018041.

[19]Ling JM, Liu SF, Yuan J, et al., 2017. Comprehensive analysis of pavement roughness evaluation for airport and road with different roughness excitation. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 45(4):519-526 (in Chinese).

[20]Ling JM, Wei FL, Zhao HD, et al., 2019. Analysis of airfield composite pavement responses using full-scale accelerated pavement testing and finite element method. Construction and Building Materials, 212:596-606.

[21]Liu PF, Wang DW, Otto F, et al., 2018. Application of semi-analytical finite element method to evaluate asphalt pavement bearing capacity. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19(6):479-488.

[22]Lu Z, Hu Z, Yao HL, et al., 2016. An analytical method for evaluating highway embankment responses with consideration of dynamic wheel-pavement interactions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 83:135-147.

[23]Nielsen J, Levenberg E, Skar A, 2020. Inference of pavement properties with roadside accelerometers. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements, p.719-728.

[24]Rollings RS, Pittman DW, 1992. Field instrumentation and performance monitoring of rigid pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 118(3):361-370.

[25]Sha AM, Hu LQ, 2008. Structural characteristics of semi-rigid base course material. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 21(4):1-5 (in Chinese).

[26]Su SY, 2008. Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of Vehicle-road Coupled System Considering the Factor of Pavement Evenness. MS Thesis, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China (in Chinese).

[27]Tarefder RA, Ahmed MU, 2014. Modeling of the FWD deflection basin to evaluate airport pavements. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14(2):205-213.

[28]Wang H, Al-Qadi IL, Portas S, et al., 2013. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of instrumented airport runway pavement responses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2367(1):76-83.

[29]Wang H, Li MY, Szary P, et al., 2019. Structural assessment of asphalt pavement condition using backcalculated modulus and field data. Construction and Building Materials, 211:943-951.

[30]Wang H, Xie PY, Ji R, et al., 2021. Prediction of airfield pavement responses from surface deflections: comparison between the traditional backcalculation approach and the ANN model. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22(9):1930-1945.

[31]Ye ZJ, Lu Y, Wang LB, 2018. Investigating the pavement vibration response for roadway service condition evaluation. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018:2714657.

[32]Zeng S, 2003. Research on the Pavement Performance Evaluation and Analyze Methods. PhD Thesis, Central South University, Changsha, China (in Chinese).

[33]Zhang XM, Dong Q, 2012. Displacement field study on the full width of rigid airport pavement to aircraft loadings. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 178-181:1611-1614.

[34]Zhang YN, Druta C, Wang LB, et al., 2017. Dynamic responses of asphalt concrete slab under cyclic wheel loading using acceleration spectrum analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 152:134-144.

[35]Zou QL, Deng L, Guo TD, et al., 2016. Comparative study of different numerical models for vehicle-bridge interaction analysis. International Journal of Structural Stability & Dynamics, 16(9):1550057.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE