Full Text:   <269>

Summary:  <54>

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2024-05-28

Received: 2023-07-01

Revision Accepted: 2023-10-15

Crosschecked: 2024-05-28

Cited: 0

Clicked: 335

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Jianming DU

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-8991

Qian FANG

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8148-9228

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2024 Vol.25 No.5 P.429-442

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2300339


Comparative analysis between single-train passing and double-train intersection in a tunnel


Author(s):  Jianming DU, Qian FANG, Xuan ZHANG, Hualao WANG

Affiliation(s):  Bridge and Tunnel Research Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   qfang@bjtu.edu.cn

Key Words:  Railway tunnel, Aerodynamic effect, Pressure characteristic, Train speed, Tunnel length, Blockage ratio


Share this article to: More <<< Previous Article|

Jianming DU, Qian FANG, Xuan ZHANG, Hualao WANG. Comparative analysis between single-train passing and double-train intersection in a tunnel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2024, 25(5): 429-442.

@article{title="Comparative analysis between single-train passing and double-train intersection in a tunnel",
author="Jianming DU, Qian FANG, Xuan ZHANG, Hualao WANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="25",
number="5",
pages="429-442",
year="2024",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2300339"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Comparative analysis between single-train passing and double-train intersection in a tunnel
%A Jianming DU
%A Qian FANG
%A Xuan ZHANG
%A Hualao WANG
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 25
%N 5
%P 429-442
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2024
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2300339

TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative analysis between single-train passing and double-train intersection in a tunnel
A1 - Jianming DU
A1 - Qian FANG
A1 - Xuan ZHANG
A1 - Hualao WANG
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 25
IS - 5
SP - 429
EP - 442
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2024
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2300339


Abstract: 
Aerodynamic pressure significantly impacts the scientific evaluation of tunnel service performance. The aerodynamic pressure of two trains running in a double-track tunnel is considerably more complicated than that of a single train. We used the numerical method to investigate the difference in aerodynamic pressure between a single train and two trains running in a double-track tunnel. First, the numerical method was verified by comparing the results of numerical simulation and on-site monitoring. Then, the characteristics of aerodynamic pressure were studied. Finally, the influence of various train–tunnel factors on the characteristics of aerodynamic pressure was investigated. The results show that the aerodynamic pressure variation can be divided into stage I: irregular pressure fluctuations before the train tail leaves the tunnel exit, and stage II: periodic pressure declines after the train tail leaves the tunnel exit. In addition, the aerodynamic pressure simultaneously jumps positively or drops negatively for a single train or two trains running in double-track tunnel scenarios. The pressure amplitude in the two-train case is higher than that for a single train. The maximum positive peak pressure difference (PSTP) and maximum negative peak pressure difference (PSTN) increase as train speed rises to the power from 2.256 to 2.930 in stage I. The PSTP and PSTN first increase and then decrease with the increase of tunnel length in stage I. The PSTP and PSTN increase as the blockage ratio rises to the power from 2.032 to 2.798 in stages I and II.

隧道内单车经过与双车交汇的对比分析

作者:杜建明1,房倩2,张翾1,王华牢1
机构:1交通运输部公路科学研究院,桥梁隧道研究中心,中国北京,100088;2北京交通大学,隧道及地下工程教育部工程研究中心,中国北京,100044
目的:气动压力是高速铁路隧道结构服役性能的重要影响因素之一。文章旨在对比高速铁路隧道内单车经过与双车交会诱发的气动压力差异特征,探究列车速度、隧道长度以及阻塞比对气动压力差异特征的影响规律,进而为高铁隧道结构后续的科学服役提供理论支撑。
创新点:1.对比分析高速铁路隧道内单车经过与双车交会诱发的气动压力差异特征;2.探究列车速度、隧道长度以及阻塞比对气动压力差异特征的影响规律。
方法:1.通过三维数值仿真,再现高速列车经过隧道的全过程;与现场实测数据进行对比,验证三维数值仿真所用模型参数的准确性与合理性。2.通过数理统计,对比高铁隧道内单车经过与双车交会诱发的气动压力差异特征,探究列车速度、隧道长度以及阻塞比对气动压力差异特征的影响规律。
结论:1.高速铁路隧道内单车经过与双车等速交会时,气动压力时程曲线同步升降低,且双车交会诱发的压力峰值显著大于单车经过;2.列车在隧道内行驶时,气动压力与速度幂次方成正相关性;3.气动压力峰值与隧道长度幂次方之间无显著的线性关系;4.列车在隧道内行驶或驶出隧道后,气动压力峰值与阻塞比幂次方均成正相关。

关键词:铁路隧道;气动效应;压力特征;列车速度;隧道长度;阻塞比

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]CEN (European Committee for Standardization), 2006. Railway Applications-Aerodynamics-Part 5: Requirements and Test Procedures for Aerodynamics in Tunnels, EN 14067-5:2006. CEN.

[2]ChenXD, LiuTH, ZhouXS, et al., 2017. Analysis of the aerodynamic effects of different nose lengths on two trains intersecting in a tunnel at 350 km/h. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 66:77-90.

[3]ChenZW, LiuTH, ZhouXS, et al., 2017. Impact of ambient wind on aerodynamic performance when two trains intersect inside a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 169:139-155.

[4]ChuCR, ChienSY, WangCY, et al., 2014. Numerical simulation of two trains intersecting in a tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 42:161-174.

[5]DengE, YangWC, HeXH, et al., 2020. Transient aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains when passing through an infrastructure consisting of tunnel–bridge–tunnel under crosswind. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 102:103440.

[6]DuJ, ZhangL, YangMZ, et al., 2020. Moving model experiments on transient pressure induced by a high-speed train passing through noise barrier. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 204:104267.

[7]DuJM, FangQ, WangG, et al., 2021. Fatigue damage and residual life of secondary lining of high-speed railway tunnel under aerodynamic pressure wave. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 111:103851.

[8]DuJM, FangQ, WangG, et al., 2022a. Aerodynamic effects produced by a high-speed train traveling through a tunnel considering different car numbers. Symmetry, 14(3):479.

[9]DuJM, FangQ, WangG, et al., 2022b. Analytical solution of a circular lined tunnel with alterable mechanical property under hydrostatic stress and internal pressure. Journal of Central South University, 29(8):2757-2770.

[10]DuJM, FangQ, WangJ, et al., 2022c. Influences of high-speed train speed on tunnel aerodynamic pressures. Applied Sciences, 12(1):303.

[11]GongC, ZhuZD, 2018. Numerical study for the aerodynamic effects of high-speed trains on secondary lining. Henan Science, 36(5):721-727 (in Chinese).

[12]HoweMS, 2007. The genetically optimized tunnel-entrance hood. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 23(8):1231-1250.

[13]HoweMS, WinslowA, IidaM, et al., 2008. Rapid calculation of the compression wave generated by a train entering a tunnel with a vented hood: short hoods. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 311(1-2):254-268.

[14]KoYY, ChenCH, HoeIT, et al., 2012. Field measurements of aerodynamic pressures in tunnels induced by high speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 100(1):19-29.

[15]LiRX, GuanYJ, 2012. Investigation of air pressure pulse when two high-speed trains passing by each other in tunnel. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 48(20):‍127-134 (in Chinese).

[16]LiWH, LiuTH, HuoXS, et al., 2019. Influence of the enlarged portal length on pressure waves in railway tunnels with cross-section expansion. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 190:10-22.

[17]LiWH, LiuTH, ChenZW, et al., 2020. Comparative study on the unsteady slipstream induced by a single train and two trains passing each other in a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 198:104095.

[18]LiXH, DengJ, ChenDW, et al., 2011. Unsteady simulation for a high-speed train entering a tunnel. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 12(12):957-963.

[19]LiuF, YaoS, ZhangJ, et al., 2018. Field measurements of aerodynamic pressures in high-speed railway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 72:97-106.

[20]LiuTH, JiangZH, LiWH, et al., 2019a. Differences in aerodynamic effects when trains with different marshalling forms and lengths enter a tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 84:70-81.

[21]LiuTH, JiangZH, ChenXD, et al., 2019b. Wave effects in a realistic tunnel induced by the passage of high-speed trains. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 86:224-235.

[22]LiuTH, GengSG, ChenXD, et al., 2020. Numerical analysis on the dynamic airtightness of a railway vehicle passing through tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 97:103286.

[23]LuYB, WangTT, YangMZ, et al., 2020. The influence of reduced cross-section on pressure transients from high-speed trains intersecting in a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 201:104161.

[24]NRA (National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China), 2018. Railway Applications—Aerodynamics—Part 4: Requirements for Train Aerodynamic Simulation, TB/T 3503.4–2018. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China(in Chinese).

[25]NiuJQ, ZhouD, LiuTH, et al., 2017. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance of a couple multiple units high-speed train. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(5):681-703.

[26]RiveroJM, González-MartínezE, Rodríguez-FernándezM, 2018. Description of the flow equations around a high speed train inside a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 172:212-229.

[27]SaitoS, 2019. Optimizing cross-sectional area of tunnel entrance hood for high speed rail. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 184:296-304.

[28]SaitoS, FukudaT, 2020. Design of a tunnel entrance hood for high-speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 206:104375.

[29]WangTT, WuF, YangMZ, et al., 2018. Reduction of pressure transients of high-speed train passing through a tunnel by cross-section increase. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 183:235-242.

[30]YangQS, SongJH, YangGW, 2016. A moving model rig with a scale ratio of 1/8 for high speed train aerodynamics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 152:50-58.

[31]ZhangL, YangMZ, LiangXF, et al., 2017. Oblique tunnel portal effects on train and tunnel aerodynamics based on moving model tests. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 167:128-139.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE