Similar articles

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system combining zygote and embryo morphology in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Methods: In a study group, 117 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with embryo transfer were carried out and 312 embryos were scored using a combined scoring system (CSS) of zygote and embryo morphology before transplantation. In a control group, a total of 420 IVF or ICSI cycles were carried out and 1176 embryos were scored using a cumulative embryo score (CES). The effects of the combined scoring system on the embryo implantation rate and pregnancy rate per cycle were analyzed. Results: Using the combined scoring system, the embryo implantation rate (27.6%) and the clinical pregnancy rate (48.7%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (20.8% and 38.6%, respectively). Also, the implantation rate of embryos scoring ≥70 (38.5%: 82 sacs/213 embryos) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of embryos scoring <70 (4%: 4 sacs/99 embryos). The pregnancy rate of patients with embryos scoring ≥70 using the combined scoring system (66.7%) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of patients with embryos scoring ≥20 using the cumulative embryo score (59.0%). Conclusion: The results suggest that selecting embryos with a high score (≥70) using the combined scoring system could increase the implantation rate and pregnancy rate, and that using a scoring system combining assessments of human zygotes and pre-implantation embryos might predict IVF outcomes more accurately than using a cumulative embryo score.

[1] de Placido, G.D., Wilding, M., Strina, I., Alviggi, E., Alviggi, C., Mollo, A., Varicchio, M.T., Tolino, A., Schiattarella, C., Dale, B., 2002. High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate. Hum. Reprod., 17(9):2402-2409.

[2] Edirisinghe, W.R., Jemmott, R., Smith, C., Allan, J., 2005. Association of pronuclear Z score with rates of aneuploidy in in vitro-fertilised embryos. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17(5):529-534.

[3] Fenwick, J., Platteau, P., Murdoch, A.P., Herbert, M., 2002. Time from insemination to first cleavage predicts developmental competence of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Hum. Reprod., 17(2):407-412.

[4] Fisch, J.D., Rodriguez, H., Ross, R., Overby, G., Sher, G., 2001. The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum. Reprod., 16(9):1970-1975.

[5] Fisch, J.D., Sher, G., Adamowicz, M., Keskintepe, L., 2003. The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril., 80(6):1352-1358.

[6] Giorgetti, C., Terriou, P., Auquier, P., Hans, E., Spach, J.L., Salzmann, J., Roulier, R., 1995. Embryo score to predict implantation after in vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum. Reprod., 10(9):2427-2431.

[7] Hernandez, E.R., 2001. Avoiding multiple pregnancies: sailing uncharted seas. Hum. Reprod., 16(4):615-616.

[8] Holte, J., Berglund, L., Milton, K., Garello, C., Gemmarelli, G., Revelli, A., Bergh, T., 2007. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod., 22(2):548-557.

[9] Hu, Y., Maxson, W.S., Hoffman, D.I., Ory, S.J., Eager, S., Dupre, J., Lu, C., 1998. Maximising pregnancy rates and limiting high-order multiple conceptions by determining the optimal number of embryos to transfer based on quality. Fertil. Steril., 69(4):650-657.

[10] Laasch, C., Puscheck, E., 2004. Cumulative embryo score, not endometrial thickness, is best for pregnancy prediction in IVF. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 21(2):47-50.

[11] Lan, K., Huang, F., Lin, Y., Kung, F., Hsieh, C., Huang, H., Tan, P., Chang, S.Y., 2003. The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Hum. Reprod., 18(6):1299-1306.

[12] Ludwig, M., Schopper, B., AI-Hasani, S., Diedrich, K., 2000. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of German embryo protection law. Hum. Reprod., 15(2):325-329.

[13] Milki, A.A., Hinckley, M.D., Gebhart, J., Dasig, D., Westphal, L.M., Behr, B., 2002. Accuracy of day 3 criteria for selecting the best embryos. Fertil. Steril., 77(6):1191-1195.

[14] Payne, J.F., Raburn, D.J., Couchman, G.M., Price, T.M., Jamison, M.G., Walmer, D.K., 2005. Relationship between pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) and standard day 2 or 3 embryo morphology with regard to assisted reproductive technique outcomes. Fertil. Steril., 84(4):900-909.

[15] Petersen, C.G., Mauri, A.L., Ferreira, R., Baruffi, R.L., Franco-Junior, J.G., 2001. Embryo selection by the first cleavage parameter between 25 and 27 hours after ICSI. J. Assist Reprod. Genet., 18(4):211-214.

[16] Rijnders, P.M., Jansen, C.A., 1998. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 13(10):2869-2873.

[17] Rossi-Ferragut, L.M., Iaconelli, A.Jr., Aoki, T., Rocha, C.C., dos Santos, D.R., Pasqualotto, F.F., Borges, E.Jr., 2003. Pronuclear and morphological features as a cumulative score to select embryos in ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) cycles according to sperm origin. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 20(1):1-7.

[18] Schieve, L.A., Meikle, S.F., Ferre, C., Peterson, H.B., Jeng, G., Wilcox, L.S., 2002. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology. N. Engl. J. Med., 346(10):731-737.

[19] Scott, L., Alvero, R., Leondires, M., Bradley, M., 2000. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum. Reprod., 15(11):2394-2403.

[20] Tesarik, J., Kopecny, V., 1989. Development of human male pronucleus: ultrastructure and timing. Gamete. Res., 24(2):135-149.

[21] Tesarik, J., Kopecny, V., 1990. Assembly of the nuclear precursor’s bodies in human male pronuclei is correlated with an early RNA synthetic activity. Exp. Cell Res., 191(1):153-156.

[22] Zaninovic, N., Veeck, L.L., Clarke, R., Rosenwaks, Z., 2000. Early assessment of human pre-embryos as an indicator for potential blastocyst development. Fertil. Steril., 74(3):S80.

[23] Zhang, Y., Xu, C.M., Zhu, Y.M., Dong, M.Y., Qian, Y.L., Jin, F., Huang, H.F., 2007. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Down syndrome pregnancy. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B., 8(7):515-521.

[24] Ziebe, S., Peterson, K., Lindenberg, S., Andersen, A.G., Gabrielsen, A., Anderson, A.N., 1997. Embryo morphology of cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 12(7):1545-1549.

[25] Zollner, U., Zollner, K.P., Hartl, G., Dietl, J., Steck, T., 2002. The use of a detailed zygote score after IVF/ICSI to obtain good quality blastocysts: the German experience. Hum. Reprod., 17(5):1327-1333.

[26] Zollner, U., Zollner, K.P., Steck, T., Dietl, J., 2003. Pronuclear scoring. Time for international standardization. J. Reprod. Med., 48(5):365-369.