Full Text:   <3270>

CLC number: TP391.9

On-line Access: 2013-04-30

Received: 2012-12-22

Revision Accepted: 2013-03-21

Crosschecked: 2013-04-16

Cited: 3

Clicked: 7771

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C 2013 Vol.14 No.5 P.311-331


A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling

Author(s):  Xiao-bo Li, Yong-lin Lei, Hans Vangheluwe, Wei-ping Wang, Qun Li

Affiliation(s):  Institute of Simulation Engineering, College of Information Systems and Management, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   lixiaobo.nudt@gmail.com

Key Words:  Multi-paradigm modeling (MPM), Decision modeling, Domain-specific modeling (DSM), Effectiveness measurement, Model transformation

Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Xiao-bo Li, Yong-lin Lei, Hans Vangheluwe, Wei-ping Wang, Qun Li. A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science C, 2013, 14(5): 311-331.

@article{title="A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling",
author="Xiao-bo Li, Yong-lin Lei, Hans Vangheluwe, Wei-ping Wang, Qun Li",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science C",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling
%A Xiao-bo Li
%A Yong-lin Lei
%A Hans Vangheluwe
%A Wei-ping Wang
%A Qun Li
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C
%V 14
%N 5
%P 311-331
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2013
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.C1200374

T1 - A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling
A1 - Xiao-bo Li
A1 - Yong-lin Lei
A1 - Hans Vangheluwe
A1 - Wei-ping Wang
A1 - Qun Li
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science C
VL - 14
IS - 5
SP - 311
EP - 331
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2013
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.C1200374

decision modeling is an essential part of the combat system effectiveness simulation (CoSES), which needs to cope with the cognitive quality, diversity, flexibility, and higher abstraction of decision making. In this paper, a multi-paradigm decision modeling framework is proposed to support decision modeling at three levels of abstraction based on domain-specific modeling (DSM). This framework designs a domain-specific modeling language (DSML) for decision modeling to raise the abstraction level of modeling, transforms the domain-specific models to formalism-based models to enable formal analysis and early verification and validation, and implements the semantics of the DSML based on a Python scripts framework which incorporates the decision model into the whole simulation system. The case study shows that the proposed approach incorporates domain expertise and facilitates domain modeler’s participation in CoSES to formulate the problem using DSML in the problem domain, and enables formal analysis and automatic implementation of the decision model in the solution domain.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Balasubramanian, D., Narayanan, A., van Buskirk, C., Karsai, G., 2006. The Graph Rewriting and Transformation Language: GReAT. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Graph Based Tools, 1:1-8.

[2]Chen, K., Sztipanovits, J., Neema, S., 2005. Toward a Semantic Anchoring Infrastructure for Domain-Specific Modeling Languages. Proc. 5th ACM Int. Conf. on Embedded Software, p.35-43.

[3]Davis, J., 2003. GME: the Generic Modeling Environment. Proc. 18th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conf. on Object-oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, p.82-83.

[4]Davis, P.K., Bigelow, J.H., 1998. Experiments in Multiresolution Modeling (MRM). RAND Co., Santa Monica, CA.

[5]Ferayorni, A.E., Sarjoughian, H.S., 2007. Domain Driven Simulation Modeling for Software Design. Proc. 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conf., p.297-304.

[6]France, R., Rumpe, B., 2005. Domain specific modeling. Softw. Syst. Model., 4(1):1-3.

[7]Hemingway, G., Neema, H., Nine, H., Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G., 2012. Rapid synthesis of high-level architecture-based heterogeneous simulation: a model-based integration approach. Simulation, 88(2):217-232.

[8]Li, F., Shen, X., 2010. A component-based aircraft instrument rapid modeling tool. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. C (Comput. & Electron.), 11(11):911-918.

[9]Li, Q., Lei, Y., Hou, H., Wang, W., 2010. Simulation Model Portability Standard 2 and Its Application. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China, p.344 (in Chinese).

[10]Li, X., Lei, Y., Vangheluwe, H., Wang, W., Li, Q., 2011. Towards a DSM-based Framework for the Development of Complex Simulation Systems. Proc. 2011 Summer Computer Simulation Conf., p.210-215.

[11]Li, X., Lei, Y., Vangheluwe, H., Wang, W., Li, Q., 2013. Domain specific decision modelling and statistical analysis for combat system effectiveness simulation. J. Stat. Comput. Simul., in press.

[12]Liu, H., Shi, Z., 2010. Intelligent Decision-Making Modeling Based on Object-Oriented Bayesian Network. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Information and Computing, p.300-303.

[13]Liu, L., 2007. Research on Modeling Fleet Cooperation Decision-Making System Based on Colored Petri Net. Master Thesis, Xidian University, Xi’an, China (in Chinese).

[14]Mittal, S., Douglass, S.A., 2011. From Domain Specific Languages to DEVS Components: Application to Cognitive M&S. Proc. Symp. on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M&S Symp., p.256-265.

[15]Mittal, S., Risco-Martín, J.L., Zeigler, B.P., 2007. DEVSML: Automating DEVS Execution over SOA Towards Transparent Simulators. DEVS Integrative M&S Symp., p.1-9.

[16]Mosterman, P.J., Vangheluwe, H., 2004. Computer automated multi-paradigm modeling: an introduction. Simulation, 80(9):432-450.

[17]Murata, T., 1989. Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE, 77(4):541-580.

[18]Neema, H., Nine, H., Hemingway, G., Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G., 2009. Rapid Synthesis of Multi-model Simulations for Computational Experiments in C2. Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association-George Mason University Symp.

[19]Ratzer, A.V., Wells, L., Lassen, H.M., Laursen, M., Qvortrup, J.F., Stissing, M.S., Westergaard, M., Christensen, S., Jensen, K., 2003. CPN tools for editing, simulating, and analysing coloured Petri nets. LNCS, 2679:450-462.

[20]Sarjoughian, H., Huang, D., 2005. A Multi-formalism Modeling Composability Framework: Agent and Discrete-Event Models. 9th IEEE Int. Symp. on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, p.249-256.

[21]Sarjoughian, H.S., Zeigler, B.P., 2000. DEVS and HLA: complementary paradigms for modeling and simulation? Simulation, 17(4):187-196.

[22]Seo, K.M., Song, H.S., Kwon, S.J., Kim, T.G., 2011. Measurement of effectiveness for an anti-torpedo combat system using a discrete event systems specification-based underwater warfare simulator. J. Def. Model. Simul., 8(3):157-171.

[23]Sokolowski, J.A., 2003. Enhanced decision modeling using multiagent system simulation. Simulation, 79(4):232-242.

[24]Son, M., Kim, T., 2012a. Torpedo evasion simulation of underwater vehicle using fuzzy-logic-based tactical decision making in script tactics manager. Expert Syst. Appl., 39(9):7995-8012.

[25]Son, M., Kim, T., 2012b. Maneuvering control simulation of underwater vehicle based on combined discrete-event and discrete-time modeling. Expert Syst. Appl., 39(17):12992-13008.

[26]Son, M.J., Cho, D.Y., Kim, T., Lee, K.Y., Nah, Y.I., 2010. Modeling and simulation of target motion analysis for a submarine using a script-based tactics manager. Adv. Eng. Softw., 41(3):506-516.

[27]Sprinkle, J., Rumpe, B., Vangheluwe, H., Karsai, G., 2011. 3 Metamodelling. LNCS, 6100:57-76.

[28]US Army Space and Missile Defense Command, 2012. EADSIM Executive Summary. Available from http://www.eadsim.com/EADSIMExecSum.pdf/ [Accessed on Apr. 21, 2013].

[29]Verbraeck, A., Valentin, E.C., 2008. Design Guidelines for Simulation Building Blocks. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf., p.923-932.

[30]Walter, T., Ebert, J., 2009. Combining DSLs and Ontologies Using Metamodel Integration. Proc. Working Conf. of Domain-specific Languages, p.148-169.

[31]Wang, W., Wang, W., Zander, J., Zhu, Y., 2009. Three-dimensional conceptual model for service-oriented simulation. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A, 10(8):1075-1081.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE