Affiliation(s): 1School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;
moreAffiliation(s): 1School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China; 2School of Intelligent Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China; 3School of Software, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.4Miami College, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;
less
Yalu WANG1, Jie LI2, Zhijie HAN3, Pu CHENG3, Roshan KUMAR4. FedSTGCN: a novel federated spatiotemporal graph learning-based network intrusion detection for the Internet of Things[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2400932
@article{title="FedSTGCN: a novel federated spatiotemporal graph learning-based network intrusion detection for the Internet of Things", author="Yalu WANG1, Jie LI2, Zhijie HAN3, Pu CHENG3, Roshan KUMAR4", journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering", year="in press", publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer", doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2400932" }
%0 Journal Article %T FedSTGCN: a novel federated spatiotemporal graph learning-based network intrusion detection for the Internet of Things %A Yalu WANG1 %A Jie LI2 %A Zhijie HAN3 %A Pu CHENG3 %A Roshan KUMAR4 %J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering %P %@ 2095-9184 %D in press %I Zhejiang University Press & Springer doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2400932"
TY - JOUR T1 - FedSTGCN: a novel federated spatiotemporal graph learning-based network intrusion detection for the Internet of Things A1 - Yalu WANG1 A1 - Jie LI2 A1 - Zhijie HAN3 A1 - Pu CHENG3 A1 - Roshan KUMAR4 J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering SP - EP - %@ 2095-9184 Y1 - in press PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer ER - doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2400932"
Abstract: Image generation models have made remarkable progress, and image evaluation is crucial for explaining and driving the development of these models. Previous studies have extensively explored human and automatic evaluations of image generation. Herein, these studies are comprehensively surveyed, specifically for two main parts: evaluation protocols and evaluation methods. First, 10 image generation tasks are summarized by focusing on their differences in evaluation aspects. Based on this, a novel protocol is proposed to cover human and automatic evaluation aspects required for various image generation tasks. Second, the review of automatic evaluation methods in the past five years is highlighted. To our knowledge, this paper presents the first comprehensive summary of human evaluation, encompassing evaluation methods, tools, details, and data analysis methods. Finally, this the challenges and potential directions for image generation evaluation are discussed. We hope that this survey will help researchers to develop a systematic understanding of image generation evaluation, stay updated with the latest advancements in the field, and encourage further research.
Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>