Abstract: The waterproof performance, mechanical properties, chemical composition, microstructure, and pore structure of hydrophobically-modified geopolymer concrete are investigated before and after dry-wet cycles, to determine the long-term feasibility of using hydrophobically-modified geopolymer concrete in wet environments. We use two types of organic modifying agents: polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and sodium methyl siliconate (SMS). The experimental results show that incorporating 2%–6% PDMS or 5%–15% SMS can make the concrete hydrophobic, with water absorption and chloride transport rates decreasing by up to 94.3%. We also analyze the bonding modes of organic molecules and geopolymer gels, as well as their evolution mechanisms during dry-wet cycles. PDMS-modified geopolymer concrete is found to exhibit long-term waterproof performance that is not weakened by dry-wet cycles. This is attributed to the robust combination of organic components and the geopolymer gel skeleton formed through phase cross-linking. Meanwhile, PDMS-modified geopolymer concrete’s hydrophobicity, strength, and microstructure are essentially unaffected. In contrast, SMS-modified geopolymer concrete shows higher water sensitivity, although it does maintain efficient waterproof performance. Due to relatively low binding energy, the dry-wet cycles may lead to the detachment of some SMS molecules from the gel network, which results in a decrease of 18.6% in compressive strength and an increase of 37.6% in total porosity. This work confirms the utility of hydrophobically-modified geopolymer concrete as a building material for long-term service in wet environments, for instance, areas with frequent precipitation, or splash and tidal zones.

疏水改性地聚物混凝土防水性能、机械特性和微观结构在干湿循环过程中的变化

[1]AmranM, Al-FakihA, ChuSH, et al., 2021. Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: an in-depth review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15:e00661. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00661

[2]ArtigasA, MonsalveA, SiposK, et al., 2015. Development of accelerated wet–dry cycle corrosion test in marine environment for weathering steels. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 50(8):628-632. https://doi.doi.org/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000007

[3]BabaeeM, CastelA, 2018. Water vapor sorption isotherms, pore structure, and moisture transport characteristics of alkali-activated and Portland cement-based binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 113:99-120. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.07.006

[4]BakharevT, 2005. Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(4):658-670. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005

[5]BanićD, GrandićD, BjegovićD, et al., 2005. Bond characteristics of corroding reinforcement in concrete beams. Application of Codes, Design and Regulations: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the University of Dundee, p.203-210. https://doi.doi.org/10.1680/aocdar.34037.0022

[6]Baroghel-BounyV, BelinP, MaultzschM, et al., 2007. AgNO₃ spray tests: advantages, weaknesses, and various applications to quantify chloride ingress into concrete. Part 1: non-steady-state diffusion tests and exposure to natural conditions. Materials and Structures, 40(8):759-781. https://doi.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9233-1

[7]ChandlerD, 2002. Hydrophobicity: two faces of water. Nature, 417(6888):491. https://doi.doi.org/10.1038/417491a

[8]ChenSK, RuanSQ, ZengQ, et al., 2022. Pore structure of geopolymer materials and its correlations to engineering properties: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 328:127064. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127064

[9]DavidovitsJ, 1989. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 35(2):429-441. https://doi.doi.org/10.1007/BF01904446

[10]DuxsonP, Fernández-JiménezA, ProvisJL, et al., 2007. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9):2917-2933. https://doi.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

[11]FletcherRA, MackenzieKJD, NicholsonCL, et al., 2005. The composition range of aluminosilicate geopolymers. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 25(9):1471-1477. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.06.001

[12]FuQ, XuWR, ZhaoX, et al., 2021. The microstructure and durability of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: a review. Ceramics International, 47(21):29550-29566. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.190

[13]GuoXL, ShiHS, DickWA, 2010. Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(2):142-147. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003

[14]HallC, 1989. Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: a review. Magazine of Concrete Research, 41(147):51-61. https://doi.doi.org/10.1680/macr.1989.41.147.51

[15]HomanL, AbabnehAN, XiYP, 2016. The effect of moisture transport on chloride penetration in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 125:1189-1195. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.124

[16]IsraelachviliJN, 1974. The nature of van der Waals forces. Contemporary Physics, 15(2):159-178. https://doi.doi.org/10.1080/00107517408210785

[17]JinHS, LiuJ, ZhongDJ, et al., 2023. Experimental study on chloride ion diffusion behavior and microstructure in concrete under alternating ambient humidity conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 401:132886. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132886

[18]KangX, LiY, MaXY, et al., 2022. Fabrication and characterization of high performance superhydrophobic organosilane-coated fly ash composites with novel micro–nano-hierarchy roughness. Journal of Materials Science, 57(29):13914-13927. https://doi.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07473-5

[19]KhaleD, ChaudharyR, 2007. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. Journal of Materials Science, 42(3):729-746. https://doi.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4

[20]KouSC, PoonCS, 2013. Long-term mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete prepared with the incorporation of fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 37:12-19. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.12.011

[21]LawDW, AdamAA, MolyneauxTK, et al., 2015. Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete. Materials and Structures, 48(3):721-731. https://doi.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0268-9

[22]LiXD, WangQ, LeiLL, et al., 2021. Amphiphobic concrete with good oil stain resistance and anti-corrosion properties used in marine environment. Construction and Building Materials, 299:123945. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123945

[23]LiuHW, LiuC, BaiGL, et al., 2020. Study on the effect of chloride ion ingress on the pore structure of the attached mortar of recycled concrete coarse aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 263:120123. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120123

[24]LuSY, WangMR, HePG, et al., 2023. Effect of sodium methyl-silicate on the performance and structure of geopolymer. Materials Letters, 350:134893. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134893

[25]LvXS, QinY, LiangH, et al., 2022. Potassium methyl silicate (CH₅SiO₃Na) assisted activation and modification of alkali-activated-slag-based drying powder coating for protecting cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 326:126858. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126858

[26]MastaliM, KinnunenP, DalvandA, et al., 2018. Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders–a critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 190:533-550. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.125

[27]MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China), 2010. Standard for Evaluation of Concrete Compressive Strength, GB/T 50107-2010. MOHURD, Beijing, China(in Chinese).

[28]MWRC (Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China), 2020. Test Code for Hydraulic Concrete, SL/T 352-2020. MWRC, Beijing, China(in Chinese).

[29](Nordic Concrete Federation)NCF, 1999. Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-Steady-State Migration Experiments, NT Build 492. NCF, Northern Europe.

[30]NeithalathN, SumanasooriyaMS, DeoO, 2010. Characterizing pore volume, sizes, and connectivity in pervious concretes for permeability prediction. Materials Characterization, 61(8):802-813. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2010.05.004

[31]ParbhooB, NagyO, 1988. Molecular dynamics in hydrogen bond forming environments. The role of hydrophilic-hydrophobic interactions in pyridine-water mixtures. Journal of Molecular Structure, 177:393-399. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2860(88)80104-2

[32]PengH, YangYW, GeYP, et al., 2022. Metakaolin-based geopolymer features different pore structure characteristics from ordinary Portland cement paste: a mechanistic study. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 34(12):4022321. https://doi.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004485

[33]PradhanP, DwibedyS, PradhanM, et al., 2022. Durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete–progress and perspectives. Journal of Building Engineering, 59:105100. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105100

[34]ProvisJL, van DeventerJSJ, 2009. Geopolymers: Structures, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications. Woodhead, UK, p.464.

[35]ProvisJL, BernalSA, 2014. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annual Review of Materials Research, 44(1):299-327. https://doi.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515

[36]RuanSQ, ChenSK, ZhuXY, et al., 2021. Matrix wettability and mechanical properties of geopolymer cement-polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) hybrids. Cement and Concrete Composites, 124:104268. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104268

[37]RuanSQ, YanDM, ChenSK, et al., 2022a. Process and mechanisms of multi-stage water sorptivity in hydrophobic geopolymers incorporating polydimethylsiloxane. Cement and Concrete Composites, 128:104460. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104460

[38]RuanSQ, ChenSK, LuJY, et al., 2022b. Waterproof geopolymer composites modified by hydrophobic particles and polydimethylsiloxane. Composites Part B: Engineering, 237:109865. https://doi.doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109865

[39]RuanSQ, ChenSK, LiuY, et al., 2023a. Early-age deformation of hydrophobized metakaolin-based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Research, 169:107168. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107168

[40]RuanSQ, QiuYL, GaoRF, et al., 2023b. Effect of organosilicone on the reaction process of functionalized geopolymers. Journal of Building Engineering, 76:107348. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107348

[41]RuanSQ, ChenSK, ZhangYJ, et al., 2023c. Molecular-level hybridized hydrophobic geopolymer ceramics for corrosion protection. Chemistry of Materials, 35(4):1735-1744. https://doi.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03522

[42]SAC (Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China), 2020. Test Methods of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, GB/T 11969-2020. SAC, Beijing, China(in Chinese).

[43]SheYS, ChenYX, LiLJ, et al., 2023. Understanding the generation and evolution of hydrophobicity of silane modified fly ash/slag based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 142:105206. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105206

[44]SunDW, WangYL, MaWX, et al., 2021. C–S–H gel structure and water molecules behaviors under different chemical environments in a range of temperatures. Materials Today Communications, 26:101866. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101866

[45]TangDS, YangCH, ShenC, et al., 2023. Preparing hydrophobic alkali-activated slag mortar with lotus-leaf-like microstructure by adding polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Construction and Building Materials, 409:134148. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134148

[46]TianZN, ZhangZQ, TangXM, et al., 2023. Understanding the effect of moisture on interfacial behaviors of geopolymer-aggregate interaction at molecular level. Construction and Building Materials, 385:131404. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131404

[47]TomarAS, GuptaR, BijanuA, et al., 2023. TiO₂-geopolymer based novel corrosion protective micro-coatings to emaciate mild steel oxidation in severe environments. Construction and Building Materials, 395:132252. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132252

[48]Villagrán ZaccardiYA, AldereteNM, de BelieN, 2017. Improved model for capillary absorption in cementitious materials: progress over the fourth root of time. Cement and Concrete Research, 100:153-165. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.07.003

[49]WangFJ, LeiS, OuJF, et al., 2020. Effect of PDMS on the waterproofing performance and corrosion resistance of cement mortar. Applied Surface Science, 507:145016. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145016

[50]WangY, UedaT, GongFY, et al., 2019. Meso-scale mechanical deterioration of mortar due to sodium chloride attack. Cement and Concrete Composites, 96:163-173. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.11.021

[51]WasimM, NgoTD, LawD, 2021. A state-of-the-art review on the durability of geopolymer concrete for sustainable structures and infrastructure. Construction and Building Materials, 291:123381. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123381

[52]WitkowskiH, KoniorczykM, 2018. New sampling method to improve the reliability of FTIR analysis for self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 172:196-203. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.216

[53]WuYG, LuBW, BaiT, et al., 2019. Geopolymer, green alkali activated cementitious material: synthesis, applications and challenges. Construction and Building Materials, 224:930-949. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.112

[54]XieJH, WeiMW, HuangPY, et al., 2019. Fatigue behavior of the basalt fiber-reinforced polymer/concrete interface under wet-dry cycling in a marine environment. Construction and Building Materials, 228:117065. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117065

[55]XueX, LiuYL, DaiJG, et al., 2018. Inhibiting efflorescence formation on fly ash-based geopolymer via silane surface modification. Cement and Concrete Composites, 94:43-52. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.013

[56]YangJX, SheW, ZuoWQ, et al., 2021. Rational application of nano-SiO₂ in cement paste incorporated with silane: counterbalancing and synergistic effects. Cement and Concrete Composites, 118:103959. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103959

[57]ZhangDR, ZhuHJ, WuQS, et al., 2023. Investigation of the hydrophobicity and microstructure of fly ash-slag geopolymer modified by polydimethylsiloxane. Construction and Building Materials, 369:130540. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130540

[58]ZhangM, XuHY, Phalé ZezeAL, et al., 2022. Coating performance, durability and anti-corrosion mechanism of organic modified geopolymer composite for marine concrete protection. Cement and Concrete Composites, 129:104495. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104495

[59]ZhangP, ZhengYX, WangKJ, et al., 2018. A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B: Engineering, 152:79-95. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.031

[60]ZhangZH, ProvisJL, MaX, et al., 2018. Efflorescence and subflorescence induced microstructural and mechanical evolution in fly ash-based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 92:165-177. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.06.010

[61]ZhongWL, FanLF, ZhangYH, 2022a. Experimental research on the dynamic compressive properties of lightweight slag based geopolymer. Ceramics International, 48(14):20426-20437. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.328

[62]ZhongWL, ZhangYH, FanLF, et al., 2022b. Effect of PDMS content on waterproofing and mechanical properties of geopolymer composites. Ceramics International, 48(18):26248-26257. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.306

[63]ZhongWL, QiuB, ZhangYH, et al., 2023. Mesoscopic damage characteristics of hydrophobicity-modified geopolymer composites under freezing-thawing cycles based on CT scanning. Composite Structures, 326:117637. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117637

[64]ZhuC, LiuXG, LiuC, et al., 2022. Study on the chloride ion transport mechanism of recycled mixed aggregate concrete based on evolution characteristics of pore structure. Construction and Building Materials, 353:129101. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129101

[65]ZhuZD, HuoWW, SunH, et al., 2023. Correlations between unconfined compressive strength, sorptivity and pore structures for geopolymer based on SEM and MIP measurements. Journal of Building Engineering, 67:106011. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106011