CLC number: TP391
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2018-01-26
Cited: 0
Clicked: 8388
Huan-gang Wang, Xin Li, Tao Zhang. Generative adversarial network based novelty detection using minimized reconstruction error[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2018, 19(1): 116-125.
@article{title="Generative adversarial network based novelty detection using minimized reconstruction error",
author="Huan-gang Wang, Xin Li, Tao Zhang",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
volume="19",
number="1",
pages="116-125",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/FITEE.1700786"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Generative adversarial network based novelty detection using minimized reconstruction error
%A Huan-gang Wang
%A Xin Li
%A Tao Zhang
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 19
%N 1
%P 116-125
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1700786
TY - JOUR
T1 - Generative adversarial network based novelty detection using minimized reconstruction error
A1 - Huan-gang Wang
A1 - Xin Li
A1 - Tao Zhang
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 19
IS - 1
SP - 116
EP - 125
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1700786
Abstract: generative adversarial network (GAN) is the most exciting machine learning breakthrough in recent years, and it trains the learning model by finding the Nash equilibrium of a two-player zero-sum game. GAN is composed of a generator and a discriminator, both trained with the adversarial learning mechanism. In this paper, we introduce and investigate the use of GAN for novelty detection. In training, GAN learns from ordinary data. Then, using previously unknown data, the generator and the discriminator with the designed decision boundaries can both be used to separate novel patterns from ordinary patterns. The proposed GAN-based novelty detection method demonstrates a competitive performance on the MNIST digit database and the Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process compared with the PCA-based novelty detection methods using Hotelling’s T2 and squared prediction error statistics.
[1]Abadi M, Andersen D, 2016. Learning to protect communications with adversarial neural cryptography. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06918
[2]Arjovsky M, Chintala S, Bottou L, 2017. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.214-223.
[3]Berthelot D, Schumm T, Metz L, 2017. BEGAN: boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10717
[4]Clifton L, Clifton D, Watkinson P, et al., 2011. Identification of patient deterioration in vital-sign data using one-class support vector machines. Federated Conf on Computer Science and Information Systems, p.125-131.
[5]Denton E, Chintala S, Fergus R, et al., 2015. Deep generative image models using a Laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, p.1486-1494.
[6]Donahue J, Krähenbühl P, Darrell T, 2016. Adversarial feature learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09782
[7]Downs J, Vogel E, 1993. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput Chem Eng, 17(3):245-255.
[8]Dumoulin V, Belghazi I, Poole B, et al., 2016. Adversarially learned inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00704
[9]Ge Z, Song Z, 2013. Bagging support vector data description model for batch process monitoring. J Proc Contr, 23(8):1090-1096.
[10]Ge Z, Yang C, Song Z, 2009. Improved kernel PCA-based monitoring approach for nonlinear processes. Chem Eng Sci, 64(9):2245-2255.
[11]Ge Z, Gao F, Song Z, 2011. Batch process monitoring based on support vector data description method. J Proc Contr, 21(6):949-959.
[12]Ge Z, Song Z, Gao F, 2013. Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res, 52(10):3543-3562.
[13]Ge Z, Demyanov S, Chen Z, et al., 2017. Generative OpenMax for multi-class open set classification. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07418
[14]Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al., 2014. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, p.2672-2680.
[15]Grover A, Ermon S, 2017. Boosted generative models. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08484
[16]Hautamaki V, Karkkainen I, Franti P, 2004. Outlier detection using k-nearest neighbour graph. Proc 17th Int Conf on Pattern Recognition, p.430-433.
[17]He Z, Deng S, Xu X, 2005. An optimization model for outlier detection in categorical data. LNCS, 3644:400-409.
[18]Hoffmann H, 2007. Kernel PCA for novelty detection. Patt Recogn, 40(3):863-874.
[19]Kadurin A, Aliper A, Kazennov A, et al., 2017a. The cornucopia of meaningful leads: applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology. Oncotarget, 8(7):10883.
[20]Kadurin A, Nikolenko S, Khrabrov K, et al., 2017b. druGAN: an advanced generative adversarial autoencoder model for de novo generation of new molecules with desired molecular properties in silico. Mol Pharmaceut, 14(9):3098-3104.
[21]Keogh E, Lonardi S, Ratanamahatana C, 2004. Towards parameter-free data mining. Proc 10th ACM SIGKDD Int Conf on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p.206-215.
[22]Kim T, Cha M, Kim H, et al., 2017. Learning to discover cross-domain relations with generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05192
[23]Ledig C, Theis L, Huszár F, et al., 2016. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04802
[24]Li J, Liang X, Wei Y, et al., 2017. Perceptual generative adversarial networks for small object detection. CVPR, p.1951-1959.
[25]Li Y, Maguire L, 2011. Selecting critical patterns based on local geometrical and statistical information. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 33(6):1189-1201.
[26]Li Y, Liu S, Yang J, et al., 2017. Generative face completion. CVPR, p.5892-5900.
[27]Luc P, Couprie C, Chintala S, et al., 2016. Semantic segmentation using adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08408
[28]Mahadevan S, Shah S, 2009. Fault detection and diagnosis in process data using one-class support vector machines. J Proc Contr, 19(10):1627-1639.
[29]Mao X, Li Q, Xie H, et al., 2016. Least squares generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04076
[30]Mogren O, 2016. C-RNN-GAN: continuous recurrent neural networks with adversarial training. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09904
[31]Patcha A, Park J, 2007. An overview of anomaly detection techniques: existing solutions and latest technological trends. Comput Netw, 51(12):3448-3470.
[32]Pimentel M, Clifton D, Clifton L, et al., 2014. A review of novelty detection. Signal Process, 99:215-249.
[33]Radford A, Metz L, Chintala S, 2015. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06434
[34]Reed S, Akata Z, Yan X, et al., 2016. Generative adversarial text to image synthesis. Proc 33rd Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.1060-1069.
[35]Schlegl T, Seeböck P, Waldstein S, et al., 2017. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. Int Conf on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, p.146-157.
[36]Springenberg J, 2015. Unsupervised and semi-supervised learning with categorical generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06390
[37]Vondrick C, Pirsiavash H, Torralba A, 2016. Generating videos with scene dynamics. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, p.613-621.
[38]Wu J, Zhang C, Xue T, et al., 2016. Learning a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3D generative-adversarial modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, p.82-90.
[39]Xiao Y, Wang H, Xu W, et al., 2016. Robust one-class SVM for fault detection. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 151: 15-25.
[40]Yang Z, Chen W, Wang F, et al., 2017. Improving neural machine translation with conditional sequence generative adversarial nets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04887
[41]Yeh R, Chen C, Lim T, et al., 2016. Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07539
[42]Yi Z, Zhang H, Gong P, et al., 2017. DualGAN: unsupervised dual learning for image-to-image translation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02510
[43]Yu J, 2012. Semiconductor manufacturing process monitoring using Gaussian mixture model and Bayesian method with local and nonlocal information. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf, 25(3):480-493.
[44]Yu J, Qin S, 2008. Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference-based finite Gaussian mixture models. AIChE J, 54(7):1811-1829.
[45]Yu J, Qin S, 2009. Multiway Gaussian mixture model based multiphase batch process monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res, 48(18):8585-8594.
[46]Yu L, Zhang W, Wang J, et al., 2017. SeqGAN: sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient. 31st AAAI Conf on Artificial Intelligence, p.2852-2858.
[47]Zhao F, Feng J, Zhao J, et al., 2018. Robust LSTM-autoencoders for face de-occlusion in the wild. IEEE Trans Image Process, 27(2):778-790.
[48]Zhao J, Mathieu M, LeCun Y, 2016. Energy-based generative adversarial network. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03126
[49]Zhu J, Park T, Isola P, et al., 2017. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10593
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>