CLC number: HO-05
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4891
XU Li-sheng. STRATEGIC COMPETENCE FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2000, 1(4): 476-480.
@article{title="STRATEGIC COMPETENCE FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION",
author="XU Li-sheng",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="1",
number="4",
pages="476-480",
year="2000",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2000.0476"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T STRATEGIC COMPETENCE FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
%A XU Li-sheng
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 1
%N 4
%P 476-480
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2000
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2000.0476
TY - JOUR
T1 - STRATEGIC COMPETENCE FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
A1 - XU Li-sheng
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 1
IS - 4
SP - 476
EP - 480
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2000
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2000.0476
Abstract: This paper first examines the relationship of the components of communicative competence to culture, pointing out that strategic competence, unlike sociolinguistic or discourse competence, is not culture-specific and therefore is supposed to play a more crucial role in intercultural communication. And then it discusses research on strategic competence, particularly the contributions it can make to our efforts to understand and improve intercultural communication. Some questions that further research should address are also raised. Finally it stresses the special significance of exploring strategic competence for studying intercultural communication and indicates implications that the exploration may have for second- and foreign-language teaching.
[1]Bialystok, E., 1990. Communication Strategies. Blackwell, Oxford.
[2]Canale, M., 1983. From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In:Language and Communication J.C.Richards & R.W.Schmidt(eds.). Longman, Harlow, p.2-27.
[3]Canale, M. & Swain, M. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1:1-47.
[4]Chen, S.Q., 1990. A study of communicative strategies in interlanguage production by Chinese EFL learners.Language Learning, 40:155-187.
[5]Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge.
[6]Clyne, M. 1981. Cultural and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 5:61-65.
[7]Corder, S.P., 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[8]Faerch, C. & Kasper, G., 1983. Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. Longman, Harlow.
[9]Hymes, D., 1972. On communicative competence. In: Sociolinguistics, J.Pride & J.Holmes(eds.). Penguim, Harmondsworth, p.269-293.
[10]Imahori,T.T. & Cupach,W.R., 1994. A cross-cultural comparison of the interpretation and management of face: American and Japanese responses to embarrassing predicaments. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,18:193-219.
[11]Kaplan, R., 1966. Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16:1-20.
[12]Paribakht, T., 1985. Strategic competence and language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 6:132-146.
[13]Paulston, C.B., 1992. Linguistic and Communicative Competence: Topics in ESL. Multilingual Matters Ltd, Clevedon.
[14]Scollon, R. & Wong-Scollon, S., 1991. Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse. World English, 10: 113-125.
[15]Siegal, M., 1996. The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17:365-379.
[16]Swain, M., 1984. Large-scale communicative language testing: A case study. In: Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching, S.J.Savingnon & M.S.Berns (eds.), Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
[17]Tarone, E., 1980. Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30: 417-431.
[18]Young, L.W.L., 1994. Crosstalk and Culture in Sino-American Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>