CLC number: A122/4801
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3997
YU Jian-xing, CHU Jun-guo. A RECONSIDERATION OF MARX'S IDEA OF "ASSOCIATION OF FREE INDIVIDUALS"[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2001, 2(3): 348-355.
@article{title="A RECONSIDERATION OF MARX'S IDEA OF "ASSOCIATION OF FREE INDIVIDUALS"",
author="YU Jian-xing, CHU Jun-guo",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="2",
number="3",
pages="348-355",
year="2001",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2001.0348"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A RECONSIDERATION OF MARX'S IDEA OF "ASSOCIATION OF FREE INDIVIDUALS"
%A YU Jian-xing
%A CHU Jun-guo
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 2
%N 3
%P 348-355
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2001
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2001.0348
TY - JOUR
T1 - A RECONSIDERATION OF MARX'S IDEA OF "ASSOCIATION OF FREE INDIVIDUALS"
A1 - YU Jian-xing
A1 - CHU Jun-guo
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 2
IS - 3
SP - 348
EP - 355
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2001
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2001.0348
Abstract: The whole marxist theory centers on the emancipation and freedom of human beings, the naming of his highest ideal as `association of free individuals' being the clear proof. However, it would be superficial to announce marxism as humanism of individualism according to marx's pursuit of `free development of each'. The `free development of each' put forward by marx when describing the `association of free individuals' refers to individuals' re-subjecting their social relations that have been changed into material powers owing to private ownership and alienation. In this sense, the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all. In this very sense, too, the foundation of the real community is required as the presupposition so as to relate his theory of freedom to the theory on the elimination of private ownership and the alienation and elimination of class and state finally.
[1] Aristotle, 1999. The Politics of Aristotle. China Social Sciences Publishing House, Beijing, p.6.
[2] Dallmayr, F.R. 1992. Twilight of subjectivity. Shanghai People's Publisher, Shanghai, p.54,207.
[3] Dewey, J. 1988. Reconstruction in Philosophy and Essays 1920. Southern Illinois University Press, p.7,187,187-189.
[4] Hegel, 1956. Philosophy of History, Trans. by J·Sibree. Dover Publications, New York, p.364.
[5] Hegel, 1999. The Phenomenology of Mind. China Social Sciences Publishing House, Beijing, p.218,227,501,604.
[6] Hegel, 1971. Philosophy of Right, Trans. by T·M·Knox. Oxford University Press, London, para 185,257,258A.
[7] Marx & Engles, 1984. The Manifesto of the Communist Party, In: Collected Works, Vol.6, Progress Publishers, Moscow, p.212,506.
[8] Marx, 1975. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, In: Collected Works, Vol.3, Progress Publishers, Moscow. p.333.
[9] Marx & Engles, 1964. The German Ideology, In: Selected Works, Vol.1, Progress Publishers, Moscow, p.32,36-37,38,91,91-92,92-93,95.
[10] Marx, 1984. The Poverty of Philosophy, In: Collected Works, Vol.6, Progress Publishers, Moscow, p.159.
[11] Marx, 1986. Economic Manuscripts of 1857-1858, In: Marx, Engles Collected Works, Vol.28, Progress Publishers, Moscow, p.18,93,94,95,95-96,100,101,195.
[12] Marx, 1983. Capital I, Progress Publishers, Moscow, p.20-21.
[13] Molina, V., 1990. Notes on Marx and the Problem of Individuality, In: Karl Marx's Social and Political thought: Critical Assessments, Vol. IV, Routledge, p.36-43.
[14] Taylor, C., 1993.Hegel And Modern Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.1,80,82.
[15] Xue Hua, 1988. Habermas' Discussethics. Liaoning Education Publishing House, Shenyang, p.71.
[16] Yu Jianxing, 2000. A Critique of Liberalism and Reconstruction of the Theory of Liberty: Hegel's Political Philosophy and its Influence, Xuelin Press, Shanghai.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>