Full Text:
<2566>
CLC number: TP391
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5015
Million Book Project vs Google™ Print
| |||||||||||||
ST. CLAIR Gloriana. Million Book Project vs Google™ Print[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2005, 6(11): 1195-1200.
@article{title="Million Book Project vs Google™ Print",
author="ST. CLAIR Gloriana",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="6",
number="11",
pages="1195-1200",
year="2005",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2005.A1195"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Million Book Project vs Google™ Print
%A ST. CLAIR Gloriana
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 6
%N 11
%P 1195-1200
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2005
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1195
TY - JOUR
T1 - Million Book Project vs Google™ Print
A1 - ST. CLAIR Gloriana
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 6
IS - 11
SP - 1195
EP - 1200
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2005
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1195
Abstract: google’s announcement that it intended to digitize all the books in several major research libraries was met with mixed reactions. John Wilkin at the University of Michigan declared “This is the day the world changes,” while Rory Litwin said in Library Juice that the move would “commercialize the great research libraries with a handshake, suddenly and epochally.” The four directors of the universal Library and million Book Project have received many questions about the comparative aspects of our work and google Print. My purpose is to compare the two, talking about their genesis, the realities of collections and logistics, and the worries that arise from these realities.
[1] Kalam, A.P.J.A., 2002. Ignited Minds: Unleashing the Power within India. Penguin, New Delhi, p.121-127.
[2] Litwin, R., 2004. On Google’s Monetization of Libraries. Library Juice, 7(26) (December 17, 2004):7. http://www.libr.org/Juice/issues/vol7/LJ_7.26.html#3.
[3] Misseli, 2005. The Google Deal (Down on the Farm). Message Posted by a Stanford University Staff Member to Confessions of a Mad Librarian (January 7, 2005). http://edwards.orcas.net/~misseli/blog/archives/000220.html.
[4] O’Brien, T.L., 2005. King Kong vs. the Pirates of the Multiplex. New York Times (August 28, 2005): Business Section 1, 7. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/business/media/28-movie.html.
[5] Stross, R., 2005. Quoting Google CEO Eric Schmidt in “Google Anything, So Long as It’s Not Google.” New York Times (August 28, 2005), A3. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/28/technology/28digi.html.
[6] Troll Covey, D., 2005a. Acquiring Copyright Permission to Digitize and Provide Open Access to Books. Council on Library and Information Resources and Digital Library Federation, Washington, DC.
[7] Troll Covey, D., 2005b. Copyright and the Universal Digital Library. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Universal Digital Library (ICUDL), Hangzhou, China.
[8] Wyatt, E., 2005. Google Library Database is Delayed. New York Times (August 13, 2005), A15, 22. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50614FD3E5A0C708DDDA10894DD404482.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>