Similar articles

Abstract: A composite liner consisting of a geomembrane (GMB) and a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) can be compromised by inorganic contaminants because of a defective GMB. When the composite liner with defective GMB is exposed to aggressive leachate conditions, the neglect of the chemical incompatibility of the GCL can potentially result in an underestimation of the leakage rate and flux through the composite liner. This paper proposed a numerical investigation on the effect of chemical incompatibility of GCL on the barrier performance of the composite liner with hole defect. Four cases with leachate solutions having varied cation valencies and ionic strengths were analyzed, in which the hydraulic conductivity of GCL was concentration-dependent. Both the effect of the chemical incompatibility of GCL and the mechanisms were analyzed. The incompatibility of GCL resulted in significant increases in leakage rate and flux through the composite liner by factors of up to 4.9 and 5.0, respectively. The incompatibility-affected area in GCL is located within 0.1 m from the center of the hole in the GMB. The coupled increase in the hydraulic conductivity of GCL and pore water concentration impacts the flux and leakage in a short period of time. With GCL chemical incompatibility considered, advection may dominate the contaminant transport through GCL.

膨润土防水毯化学相容性对通过带缺陷复合衬垫中的渗流及污染物迁移影响的数值研究

[1]AbdulsalamA, IdrisA, MohamedTA, et al., 2017. An integrated technique using solar and evaporation ponds for effective brine disposal management. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 36(9):914-925.

[2]BaroneFS, YanfulEK, QuigleyRM, et al., 1989. Effect of multiple contaminant migration on diffusion and adsorption of some domestic waste contaminants in a natural clayey soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 26(2):189-198.

[3]BarrosoM, Touze-FoltzN, von MaubeugeK, et al., 2006. Laboratory investigation of flow rate through composite liners consisting of a geomembrane, a GCL and a soil liner. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(3):139-155.

[4]BouazzaA, SinghRM, RoweRK, et al., 2014. Heat and moisture migration in a geomembrane‍–‍GCL composite liner subjected to high temperatures and low vertical stresses. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42(5):555-563.

[5]BrownKW, ThomasJC, LyttonRL, et al., 1987. Quantification of Leak Rates Through Holes in Landfill Liners. EPA/600/S2-87/062, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, USA.

[6]ChaiJC, ProngmaneeN, 2020. Barrier properties of a geosynthetic clay liner using polymerized sodium bentonite. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 48(3):392-399.

[7]ChenGN, LiYC, ZuoXR, et al., 2020. Comparison of adsorption behaviors of kaolin from column and batch tests: concept of dual porosity. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 146(9):04020102.

[8]ChenGN, YaoSY, WangY, et al., 2022. Measurement of contaminant adsorption on soils using cycling modified column tests. Chemosphere, 294:133822.

[9]El-SebaiiAA, RamadanMRI, Aboul-EneinS, et al., 2011. History of the solar ponds: a review study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6):3319-3325.

[10]El-ZeinA, McCarrollI, MasoudianMS, 2016. Inorganic transport through composite geosynthetics and compacted clay liners under geomembranes with multiple defects. Australian Geomechanics Journal, 51(1):23-39.

[11]FooseGJ, BensonCH, EdilTB, 2001. Analytical equations for predicting concentration and mass flux from composite liners. Geosynthetics International, 8(6):551-575.

[12]FooseGJ, BensonCH, EdilTB, 2002. Comparison of solute transport in three composite liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(5):391-403.

[13]GiroudJP, 1997. Equations for calculating the rate of liquid migration through composite liners due to geomembrane defects. Geosynthetics International, 4(3-4):335-348.

[14]GiroudJP, BonaparteR, 1989. Leakage through liners constructed with geomembranes—part II. Composite liners. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 8(2):71-111.

[15]GiroudJP, BonaparteR, 2001. Geosynthetics in liquid-containing structures. In: Rowe RK (Ed.), Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering Handbook. Springer, Boston, USA, p.789-824.

[16]JavandelI, DoughtyC, TsangCF, 1984. Groundwater Transport: Handbook of Mathematical Models. American Geophysical Union, Washington, USA, p.228.

[17]JoHY, KatsumiT, BensonCH, et al., 2001. Hydraulic conductivity and swelling of nonprehydrated GCLs permeated with single-species salt solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(7):‍557-567.

[18]JoHY, BensonCH, EdilTB, 2004. Hydraulic conductivity and cation exchange in non-prehydrated and prehydrated bentonite permeated with weak inorganic salt solutions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 52(6):661-679.

[19]JoHY, BensonCH, ShackelfordCD, et al., 2005. Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a geosynthetic clay liner permeated with inorganic salt solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(4):405-417.

[20]KatsumiT, IshimoriH, OgawaA, et al., 2007. Hydraulic conductivity of nonprehydrated geosynthetic clay liners permeated with inorganic solutions and waste leachates. Soils and Foundations, 47(1):79-96.

[21]KhodarySM, ElwakilAZ, FujiiM, et al., 2020. Effect of hazardous industrial solid waste landfill leachate on the geotechnical properties of clay. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(15):706.

[22]KjeldsenP, BarlazMA, RookerAP, et al., 2002. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32(4):297-336.

[23]KolstadDC, BensonCH, EdilTB, 2004. Hydraulic conductivity and swell of nonprehydrated geosynthetic clay liners permeated with multispecies inorganic solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(12):1236-1249.

[24]LakeCB, RoweRK, 2000. Diffusion of sodium and chloride through geosynthetic clay liners. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18(2-4):103-131.

[25]LeeJM, ShackelfordCD, 2005. Impact of bentonite quality on hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(1):64-77.

[26]LeeJM, ShackelfordCD, BensonCH, et al., 2005. Correlating index properties and hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(11):1319-1329.

[27]PetrovRJ, RoweRK, 1997. Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL)‍- chemical compatibility by hydraulic conductivity testing and factors impacting its performance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(6):863-885.

[28]PetrovRJ, RoweRK, QuigleyRM, 1997. Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(8):683-695.

[29]RoweRK, 1998. Geosynthetics and the minimization of contaminant migration through barrier systems beneath solid waste. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, p.27-103.

[30]RoweRK, 2012. Short- and long-term leakage through composite liners. The 7th Arthur Casagrande Lecture. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49(2):141-169.

[31]RoweRK, BrachmanRWI, 2004. Assessment of equivalence of composite liners. Geosynthetics International, 11(4):273-286.

[32]RoweRK, AbdelattyK, 2012. Modeling contaminant transport through composite liner with a hole in the geomembrane. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49(7):773-781.

[33]RoweRK, AbdelRazekAY, 2019. Effect of interface transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity on contaminant migration through composite liners with wrinkles or failed seams. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 56(11):1650-1667.

[34]RoweRK, QuigleyRM, BrachmanRWI, et al., 2004. Barrier Systems for Waste Disposal Facilities, Edition. CRC Press, London, UK, p.45-99.

[35]RuhlJL, DanielDE, 1997. Geosynthetic clay liners permeated with chemical solutions and leachates. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(4):369-381.

[36]SaidiF, Touze-FoltzN, GobletP, 2006. 2D and 3D numerical modelling of flow through composite liners involving partially saturated GCLs. Geosynthetics International, 13(6):265-276.

[37]SetzMC, TianK, BensonCH, et al., 2017. Effect of ammonium on the hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45(6):665-673.

[38]ShackelfordCD, RedmondPL, 1995. Solute breakthrough curves for processed kaolin at low flow rates. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 121(1):17-32.

[39]ShackelfordCD, LeeJM, 2003. The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51(2):186-196.

[40]ShackelfordCD, BensonCH, KatsumiT, et al., 2000. Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18(2-4):133-161.

[41]ThomasRW, KoernerRM, 1996. Advances in HDPE barrier walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 14(7-8):393-408.

[42]VaskoSM, JoHY, BensonCH, et al., 2001. Hydraulic conductivity of partially prehydrated geosynthetic clay liners permeated with aqueous calcium chloride solutions. Proceedings of the Geosynthetics Conference 2001, p.685-699.