Similar articles

Abstract: underwater minirobots have attracted significant interest due to their value in complex application scenarios. Typical underwater minirobots are driven mainly by a soft or rigid actuator. However, soft actuation is currently facing challenges, including inadequate motional control accuracy and the lack of a continuous and steady driving force, while conventional rigid actuation has limited actuation efficiency, environmental adaptability, and motional flexibility, which severely limits the accomplishment of complicated underwater tasks. In this study, we developed underwater minirobots actuated by a hybrid driving method (HDM) that combines combustion-based actuators and propeller thrusters to achieve accurate, fast, and flexible underwater locomotion performance. Underwater experiments were conducted to investigate the kinematic performance of the minirobots with respect to the motion modes of rising, drifting, and hovering. Numerical models were used to investigate the kinematic characteristics of the minirobots, and theoretical models developed to unveil the mechanical principle that governs the driving process. Satisfactory agreement was obtained from comarisons of the experimental, numerical, and theoretical results. Finally, the HDM was compared with selected hybrid driving technologies in terms of acceleration and response time. The comparison showed that the minirobots based on HDM were generally superior in transient actuation ability and reliability.

基于混合驱动技术的水下小型机器人

[1]AdamSAA, ZhouJP, ZhangYH, 2017. Modeling and simulation of 5DOF robot manipulator and trajectory using MATLAB and CATIA. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, p.36-40.

[2]AlbiezJ, JoyeuxS, GaudigC, et al., 2015. FlatFish‍‒‍a compact subsea-resident inspection AUV. OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Washington, p.1-8.

[3]AnRC, GuoSX, GuSX, et al., 2019. Improvement and evaluation for the stability of mobile spherical underwater robots (SUR III). IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, p.2512-2517.

[4]AntonelliG, CaccavaleF, ChiaveriniS, 2004. Adaptive tracking control of underwater vehicle-manipulator systems based on the virtual decomposition approach. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 20(3):594-602.

[5]BanerjeeH, SuhailM, RenHL, 2018. Hydrogel actuators and sensors for biomedical soft robots: brief overview with impending challenges. Biomimetics, 3(3):15.

[6]ChenGM, LiuA, HuJH, et al., 2020. Attitude and altitude control of unmanned aerial-underwater vehicle based on incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion. IEEE Access, 8:156129-156138.

[7]ChenYH, WanF, WuT, et al., 2018. Soft-rigid interaction mechanism towards a lobster-inspired hybrid actuator. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 28(1):014007.

[8]ChengY, HuangC, YangD, et al., 2018. Bilayer hydrogel mixed composites that respond to multiple stimuli for environmental sensing and underwater actuation. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 6(48):8170-8179.

[9]da CunhaMP, DebijeMG, SchenningAPHJ, 2020. Bioinspired light-driven soft robots based on liquid crystal polymers. Chemical Society Reviews, 49(18):6568-6578.

[10]DasB, SubudhiB, PatiBB, 2016. Co-operative control of a team of autonomous underwater vehicles in an obstacle-rich environment. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 15(3):135-151.

[11]DinmohammadiF, FlynnD, BaileyC, et al., 2019. Predicting damage and life expectancy of subsea power cables in offshore renewable energy applications. IEEE Access, 7:54658-54669.

[12]GuSX, GuoSX, ZhengL, 2020. A highly stable and efficient spherical underwater robot with hybrid propulsion devices. Autonomous Robots, 44(5):759-771.

[13]HeZG, YangY, JiaoPC, et al., 2023. Copebot: underwater soft robot with copepod-like locomotion. Soft Robotics, 10(2):314-325.

[14]IscarE, BarbalataC, GoumasN, et al., 2018. Towards low cost, deep water AUV optical mapping. OCEANS MTS/IEEE Charleston, p.1-6.

[15]JiaoPC, YeXH, ZhangCJ, et al., 2023. Vision-based real-time marine and offshore structural health monitoring system using underwater robots. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, in press.

[16]KadiyamJ, MohanS, 2019. Conceptual design of a hybrid propulsion underwater robotic vehicle with different propulsion systems for ocean observations. Ocean Engineering, 182:112-125.

[17]KimNH, KimJM, KhatibO, et al., 2017. Design optimization of hybrid actuation combining macro-mini actuators. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18(4):519-527.

[18]LaschiC, MazzolaiB, CianchettiM, 2016. Soft robotics: technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Science Robotics, 1(1):eaah3690.

[19]LeeC, KimM, KimYJ, et al., 2017. Soft robot review. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 15(1):3-15.

[20]LeeH, XiaCG, FangNX, 2010. First jump of microgel; actuation speed enhancement by elastic instability. Soft Matter, 6(18):4342-4345.

[21]LiGR, ChenXP, ZhouFH, et al., 2021. Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench. Nature, 591(7848):66-71.

[22]LiH, GoG, KoSY, et al., 2016. Magnetic actuated pH-responsive hydrogel-based soft micro-robot for targeted drug delivery. Smart Materials and Structures, 25(2):027001.

[23]LiTF, LiGR, LiangYM, et al., 2017. Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Science Advances, 3(4):e1602045.

[24]LiWB, ZhangWM, ZouHX, et al., 2018. A fast rolling soft robot driven by dielectric elastomer. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 23(4):1630-1640.

[25]LiX, ZhuDQ, QianYA, 2014. A survey on formation control algorithms for multi-AUV system. Unmanned Systems, 2(4):351-359.

[26]McCoulD, RossetS, BesseN, et al., 2017. Multifunctional shape memory electrodes for dielectric elastomer actuators enabling high holding force and low-voltage multisegment addressing. Smart Materials and Structures, 26(2):025015.

[27]Mohd SaidM, YunasJ, BaisB, et al., 2017. The design, fabrication, and testing of an electromagnetic micropump with a matrix-patterned magnetic polymer composite actuator membrane. Micromachines, 9(1):13.

[28]NetoEC, SáRC, HolandaGC, et al., 2014. Autonomous underwater vehicle to inspect hydroelectric dams. International Journal of Computer Applications, 101(11):1-11.

[29]QiW, AlivertiA, 2020. A multimodal wearable system for continuous and real-time breathing pattern monitoring during daily activity. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 24(8):2199-2207.

[30]QiW, OvurSE, LiZJ, et al., 2021. Multi-sensor guided hand gesture recognition for a teleoperated robot using a recurrent neural network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3):6039-6045.

[31]RusD, TolleyMT, 2015. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 521(7553):467-475.

[32]SadeghzadehA, AsuaE, FeuchtwangerJ, et al., 2012. Ferromagnetic shape memory alloy actuator enabled for nanometric position control using hysteresis compensation. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 182:122-129.

[33]SahooA, DwivedySK, RobiPS, 2019. Advancements in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Engineering, 181:145-160.

[34]SchmidtAM, 2006. Electromagnetic activation of shape memory polymer networks containing magnetic nanoparticles. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 27(14):1168-1172.

[35]ShinD, SardellittiI, KhatibO, 2008. A hybrid actuation approach for human-friendly robot design. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p.1747-1752.

[36]SongSH, KimMS, RodrigueH, et al., 2016. Turtle mimetic soft robot with two swimming gaits. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 11(3):036010.

[37]SongY, HeB, LiuP, 2021. Real-time object detection for AUVs using self-cascaded convolutional neural networks. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 46(1):56-67.

[38]StokesAA, ShepherdRF, MorinSA, et al., 2014. A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robotics, 1(1):70-74.

[39]TolleyMT, ShepherdRF, MosadeghB, et al., 2014a. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robotics, 1(3):213-223.

[40]TolleyMT, ShepherdRF, KarpelsonM, et al., 2014b. An untethered jumping soft robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.561-566.

[41]ToneT, SuzukiK, 2018. An automated liquid manipulation by using a ferrofluid-based robotic sheet. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4):2814-2821.

[42]WangHP, YangY, LinGZ, et al., 2021. Untethered, high-speed soft jumpers enabled by combustion for motions through multiphase environments. Smart Materials and Structures, 30(1):015035.

[43]WangHP, YangY, YeXH, et al., 2023. Combustion-enabled underwater vehicles (CUVs) in dynamic fluid environment. Journal of Field Robotics, in press.

[44]XinB, LuoXH, ShiZC, et al., 2013. A vectored water jet propulsion method for autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Engineering, 74:133-140.

[45]YangY, HouBZ, ChenJY, et al., 2020. High-speed soft actuators based on combustion-enabled transient driving method (TDM). Extreme Mechanics Letters, 37:100731.

[46]YangY, HeZG, LinGZ, et al., 2022. Large deformation mechanics of the thrust performances generated by combustion-enabled soft actuators. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 229:107513.

[47]YaoP, ZhaoSQ, 2018. Three-dimensional path planning for AUV based on interfered fluid dynamical system under ocean current (June 2018). IEEE Access, 6:42904-42916.

[48]YueCF, GuoSX, LiMX, 2013. ANSYS FLUENT-based modeling and hydrodynamic analysis for a spherical underwater robot. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, p.1577-1581.

[49]ZhangBY, FanYW, YangPH, et al., 2019. Worm-like soft robot for complicated tubular environments. Soft Robotics, 6(3):399-413.

[50]ZhangLC, HuangQ, CaiKJ, et al., 2020. A wearable soft knee exoskeleton using vacuum-actuated rotary actuator. IEEE Access, 8:61311-61326.

[51]ZhangSW, LiangX, XuLC, et al., 2013. Initial development of a novel amphibious robot with transformable fin-leg composite propulsion mechanisms. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 10(4):434-445.

[52]ZhangTS, YangL, YangX, et al., 2021. Millimeter-scale soft continuum robots for large-angle and high-precision manipulation by hybrid actuation. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(2):2000189.

[53]ZhouF, GuLY, LuoGS, et al., 2013. Development of a hydraulic propulsion system controlled by proportional pressure valves for the 4500m work-class ROV. OCEANS-San Diego, p.1-6.

[54]ZiB, YinGC, ZhangD, 2016. Design and optimization of a hybrid-driven waist rehabilitation robot. Sensors, 16(12):2121.