Similar articles

Abstract: Functional studies have suggested the important role of early growth response 1 (EGR1) and Laminin α2-chain (LAMA2) in human eye development. Genetic studies have reported a significant association of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the LAMA2 gene with myopia. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the tagging SNPs (tSNPs) in the EGR1 and LAMA2 genes with high myopia in two independent Han Chinese populations. Four tSNPs (rs11743810 in the EGR1 gene; rs2571575, rs9321170, and rs1889891 in the LAMA2 gene) were selected, according to the HapMap database (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and were genotyped using the ligase detection reaction (LDR) approach for 167 Han Chinese nuclear families with extremely highly myopic offspring (<−10.0 diopters) and an independent group with 485 extremely highly myopic cases (<−10.0 diopters) and 499 controls. Direct sequencing was used to confirm the LDR results in twenty randomly selected subjects. Family-based association analysis was performed using the family-based association test (FBAT) software package (Version 1.5.5). Population-based association analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. The association analysis power was estimated using online software (http://design.cs.ucla.edu). The FBAT demonstrated that all four tSNPs tested did not show association with high myopia (P>0.05). Haplotype analysis of tSNPs in the LAMA2 genes also did not show a significant association (P>0.05). Meanwhile, population-based association analysis also showed no significant association results with high myopia (P>0.05). On the basis of our family- and population-based analyses for the Han Chinese population, we did not find positive association signals of the four SNPs in the LAMA2 and EGR1 genes with high myopia.

中国汉族人群病理性高度近视与EGR1和LAMA2基因多态位点的关联分析

[1]Aldahmesh, M.A., Khan, A.O., Alkuraya, H., et al., 2013. Mutations in LRPAP1 are associated with severe myopia in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 93(2):313-320.

[2]Ashby, R.S., Zeng, G., Leotta, A.J., et al., 2014. Egr1 mRNA expression is a marker for the direction of mammalian ocular growth. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 55(9):5911-5921.

[3]Bhattacharyya, S., Fang, F., Tourtellotte, W., et al., 2013. EGR1: new conductor for the tissue repair orchestra directs harmony (regeneration) or cacophony (fibrosis). J. Pathol., 229(2):286-297.

[4]Cheng, C.Y., Schache, M., Ikram, M.K., et al., 2013. Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 93(2):264-277.

[5]Cordell, H.J., Barratt, B.J., Clayton, D.G., 2004. Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic association studies: a unified framework for detection of genotype and haplotype associations, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, and parent-of-origin effects. Genet. Epidemiol., 26(3):167-185.

[6]Curtin, B.J., 1985. The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management. Harper & Row, Philadelphia, p.102-105.

[7]de Bakker, P.I., Yelensky, R., Pe'er, I., et al., 2005. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat. Genet., 37(11):1217-1223.

[8]Farbrother, J.E., Kirov, G., Owen, M.J., et al., 2004. Family aggregation of high myopia: estimation of the sibling recurrence risk ratio. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 45(9):2873-2878.

[9]Fischer, A.J., McGuire, J.J., Schaeffel, F., et al., 1999. Light- and focus-dependent expression of the transcription factor ZENK in the chick retina. Nat. Neurosci., 2(8):706-712.

[10]Goss, D.A., van Veen, H.G., Rainey, B.B., et al., 1997. Ocular components measured by keratometry, phakometry, and ultrasonography in emmetropic and myopic optometry students. Optom. Vis. Sci., 74(7):489-495.

[11]Guggenheim, J.A., Zhou, X., Evans, D.M., et al., 2013. Coordinated genetic scaling of the human eye: shared determination of axial eye length and corneal curvature. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 54(3):1715-1721.

[12]Guo, H., Tong, P., Liu, Y., et al., 2015. Mutations of P2 encoding prolyl 4-hydroxylase 2 are associated with nonsyndromic high myopia. Genet. Med., 17(4):300-306.

[13]Han, W., Leung, K.H., Fung, W.Y., et al., 2009. Association of PAX6 polymorphisms with high myopia in Han Chinese nuclear families. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 50(1):47-56.

[14]Harper, A.R., Summers, J.A., 2015. The dynamic sclera: extracellular matrix remodeling in normal ocular growth and myopia development. Exp. Eye Res., 133(4):100-111.

[15]Hawthorne, F.A., Young, T.L., 2013. Genetic contributions to myopic refractive error: insights from human studies and supporting evidence from animal models. Exp. Eye Res., 114(9):141-149.

[16]Hysi, P.G., Wojciechowski, R., Rahi, J.S., et al., 2014. Genome-wide association studies of refractive error and myopia, lessons learned, and implications for the future. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 55(5):3344-3351.

[17]Iribarren, R., Balsa, A., Armesto, A., et al., 2005. Family history of myopia is not related to the final amount of refractive error in low and moderate myopia. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 33(3):274-278.

[18]Jonas, J.B., Xu, L., 2014. Histological changes of high axial myopia. Eye (Lond.), 28(2):113-117.

[19]Kiefer, A.K., Tung, J.Y., Do, C.B., et al., 2013. Genome-wide analysis points to roles for extracellular matrix remodeling, the visual cycle, and neuronal development in myopia. PLoS Genet., 9(2):e1003299.

[20]Li, J., Jiang, D., Xiao, X., 2015. Evaluation of 12 myopia-associated genes in Chinese patients with high myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 56(2):722-729.

[21]Li, T., Xiao, X., Li, S., et al., 2008. Evaluation of EGR1 as a candidate gene for high myopia. Mol. Vis., 14(7):1309-1312.

[22]Miyake, M., Yamashiro, K., Tabara, Y., et al., 2015. Identification of myopia-associated WNT7B polymorphisms provides insights into the mechanism underlying the development of myopia. Nat. Commun., 31(6):6689.

[23]Morgan, I.G., Ohno-Matsui, K., Saw, S.M., 2012. Myopia. Lancet, 379(9827):1739-1748.

[24]Pan, C.W., Ramamurthy, D., Saw, S.M., 2012. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 32(1):3-16.

[25]Schéele, S., Nyström, A., Durbeej, M., et al., 2007. Laminin isoforms in development and disease. J. Mol. Med. (Berl)., 85(8):825-836.

[26]Schippert, R., Burkhardt, E., Feldkaemper, M., et al., 2007. Relative axial myopia in Egr1 (ZENK) knockout mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 48(1):11-17.

[27]Tang, W.C., Yap, M.K., Yip, S.P., 2008. A review of current approaches to identifying human genes involved in myopia. Clin. Exp. Optom., 91(1):4-22.

[28]Verhoeven, V.J., Hysi, P.G., Wojciechowski, R., et al., 2013. Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia. Nat. Genet., 45(3):314-318.

[29]Wojciechowski, R., 2011. Nature and nurture: the complex genetics of myopia and refractive error. Clin. Genet., 79(4):301-320.

[30]Wu, L.J., You, Q.S., Duan, J.L., et al., 2015. Prevalence and associated factors of myopia in high-school students in Beijing. PLoS ONE, 10(3):e0120764.

[31]Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B.P., et al., 2010. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet., 42(7):565-569.

[32]Yoshikawa, M., Yamashiro, K., Miyake, M., 2014. Comprehensive replication of the relationship between myopia-related genes and refractive errors in a large Japanese cohort. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 55(11):7343-7354.

[33]Appendix

[34]Our study has invited some controversy as follows:

[35]The authors have picked four tag SNPs from a gene that in the original studies (Verhoeven et al., 2013; Kiefer et al., 2013) were not associated with refraction or myopia, despite employing sample sizes more than 100 times larger than that in the current study; essentially they were doing the same thing, with lesser tools, but hoping for better results (extracted from reviewer’s comments).