CLC number: TN919.8
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3405
Ozbek Nukhet, Tunali E. Turhan. On optimal receiver buffer size in adaptive Internet video streaming[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2006, 7(100): 112-118.
@article{title="On optimal receiver buffer size in adaptive Internet video streaming",
author="Ozbek Nukhet, Tunali E. Turhan",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="7",
number="100",
pages="112-118",
year="2006",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2006.AS0112"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T On optimal receiver buffer size in adaptive Internet video streaming
%A Ozbek Nukhet
%A Tunali E. Turhan
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 7
%N 100
%P 112-118
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2006
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2006.AS0112
TY - JOUR
T1 - On optimal receiver buffer size in adaptive Internet video streaming
A1 - Ozbek Nukhet
A1 - Tunali E. Turhan
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 7
IS - 100
SP - 112
EP - 118
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2006
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2006.AS0112
Abstract: The effect of receiver buffer size on perceived video quality of an Internet video streamer application was examined in this work. Several network conditions and several versions of the application are used to gain understanding of the response to varying buffer sizes. Among these conditions local area versus wide area, bandwidth estimation based versus non-bandwidth estimation based cases are examined in detail. A total of 1000 min of video is streamed over Internet and statistics are collected. It was observed that when bandwidth estimation is possible, choosing larger buffer size for higher available bandwidth yields quality increase in perceived video.
[1] Balk, A., Maggiorini, D., Gerla, M., Sanadidi, M.Y., 2003. Adaptive MPEG-4 Video Streaming with Bandwidth Estimation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks.
[2] Loguinov, D., Radha, H., 2001. Measurement Study of Low-bitrate Internet Video Streaming. Proceeding of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop. San Fransisco.
[3] Rejaie, R., Handley, M., Estrin, D., 2000. Layered quality adaptation for Internet video streaming. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas of Communications, 18(12):2530-2543.
[4] Tao, S., Guerin, R., 2004. On-line Estimation of Internet Path Performance: An Application Perspective. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.
[5] Tunali, T., Ozbek, N., Anar, K., Kantarci, A., 2004. Bandwidth Aware Scaling for Internet Video Streaming. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium Computer & Information Sciences, 3280:157-166.
[6] Tunali, T., Kantarci, A., Ozbek, N., 2005. Robust quality adaptation for Internet video streaming. Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications, Kluwer Academics, 27: 341-357.
[7] Wang, R., Valla, M., Sanadidi, M.Y., Gerla, M., 2002. Using Adaptive Rate Estimation to Provide Enhanced and Robust Transport over Heterogeneous Networks. ICNP. Paris, France.
[8] Wu, D., Hou, Y.T., Zhu, W., Zhang, Y.K., Peha, J.M., 2001. Streaming video over the Internet: approaches and directions. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Tec., p.282-300.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>