CLC number: TP393; F713.36
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 5
Clicked: 6877
FENG Yi-xiong, ZHENG Bing, TAN Jian-rong. Exploratory study of logistics service quality scale based on online shopping malls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2007, 8(6): 926-931.
@article{title="Exploratory study of logistics service quality scale based on online shopping malls",
author="FENG Yi-xiong, ZHENG Bing, TAN Jian-rong",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="8",
number="6",
pages="926-931",
year="2007",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2007.A0926"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Exploratory study of logistics service quality scale based on online shopping malls
%A FENG Yi-xiong
%A ZHENG Bing
%A TAN Jian-rong
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 8
%N 6
%P 926-931
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2007
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2007.A0926
TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploratory study of logistics service quality scale based on online shopping malls
A1 - FENG Yi-xiong
A1 - ZHENG Bing
A1 - TAN Jian-rong
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 8
IS - 6
SP - 926
EP - 931
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2007
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2007.A0926
Abstract: online shopping has already become the new mode that a lot of customers try to adopt. At the same time, the online shopping could not be successfully completed without logistics service. logistics service quality (LSQ) has significant impact on revenue and profitability. This paper presents the issue from the perspective of the customer, and explores the initial factors of LSQ based on the online shopping through in-depth interview and the Delphi method. The survey uses a standard 7-point Likert-type scale to measure the LSQ. Empirical research results are shown in detail to confirm seven LSQ dimensions with Chinese characteristics, including timeliness quality, personal contact quality, order quality, order discrepancy handling, order condition and convenience. Statistical analyses of the investigation were conducted to test the reliability and validity of the LSQ evaluation model.
[1] Babakus, E., Boller, G.W., 1992. An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J. Business Res., 24(3):253-268.
[2] Bienstock, C.C., Mentzer, J.T., Bird, M.M., 1996. Measuring physical distribution service quality. J. Acad. Marketing Sci., 25(1):31-44.
[3] Brengman, M., Geunens, M., Weijters, B., Smith, S.M., Swinyard, W.R., 2005. Segmenting Internet shoppers based on the web-usage-related lifestyle: a cross cultural validation. J. Business Res., 58:79-88.
[4] Carman, J.M., 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. J. Retailing, 66(1):33-55.
[5] Churchill, G.A., 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res., 16(1):64-73.
[6] Farag, S., Krizek, K.J., Dijst, M., 2006. E-shopping and its relationship with in-store shopping: empirical evidence from the Netherlands and the USA. Transport Rev., 26(1):43-61.
[7] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res., 18:39-50.
[8] Gerbing, D.W., Anderson, J.C., 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res., 25(2):186-192.
[9] Headley, D.E., Miller, S.J., 1993. Measuring service quality and its relationship to future consumer behavior. J. Health Care Marketing, 13(4):32-41.
[10] Lambert, D.M., Stock, J.R., Sterling, J.U., 1990. A Gap Analysis of Buyer and Seller Perceptions of the Importance of Marketing Mix Attributes. AMA Educators’ Proceedings. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, p.208.
[11] Mentzer, J.T., Flint, D.J., Kent, J.L., 1999. Developing a logistics service quality scale. J. Business Logist., 20(1):9-32.
[12] Mentzer, J.T., Williams, L.R., 2001. The role of logistics leverage in marketing strategy. J. Marketing Channels, 8(3/4):29-48.
[13] Mentzer, J.T., Flint, D.J., Hult, G.T.M., 2001. Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. J. Marketing, 65(4):82-104.
[14] Mentzer, J.T., Matthew, B.M., Cheung, M.S., 2004. Global market segmentation for logistics services. Ind. Marketing Manage., 33:15-20.
[15] Morash, E.A., Droge, C.L.M., Vickery, S.K., 1996. Strategic logistics capabilities for competitive advantage and firm success. J. Business Logistics, 17(1):1-22.
[16] Parasuraman, A., Valarie, A.Z., Leonard, L.B., 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing, 49:41-50.
[17] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., 1988. SERVQUAL: a multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of the service quality. J. Retailing, 64(1):12-40.
[18] Perrault, W.D., Russ, F.A., 1974. Physical distribution service: a neglected aspect of marketing management. MSU Business Top., 22(1):37-45.
[19] Peter, J.P., 1979. Reliability: a review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. J. Marketing Res., 16(1):6-17.
[20] Rinehart, L.M., Cooper, M.B., Wagenheim, G.D., 1989. Furthering the integration of marketing and logistics through customer service in the channel. J. Acad. Marketing Sci., 17(1):63-72.
[21] Rohm, A.J., Swaminathan, V., 2004. A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motives. J. Business Res., 57:748-757.
[22] Ruekert, R.W., Churchill, G.A., 1984. Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. J. Marketing Res., 21(2):226-233.
[23] Sharma, A., Grewal, D., Levy, M., 1995. The customer satisfaction/logistics interface. J. Business Logist., 16(2):1-22.
[24] Soopramanien, D.G.R., Robertson, A., 2007. Adoption and usage of online shopping: an empirical analysis of the characteristics of ‘‘buyers’’ ‘‘browsers’’ and ‘‘non-Internet shoppers’’. J. Retailing Consumer Serv., 14(1):73-82.
[25] Weiber, R., Kollmann, T., 1998. Competitive advantage in virtual markets: perspectives of information based marketing. Eur. J. Marketing, 32(7/8):603-615.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>