Similar articles

Abstract: With continuous changes to energy-saving requirements, the task of train aerodynamic optimization becomes important. Traditional aerodynamic optimization of a high-speed train is carried out assuming the same shape of the head and tail cars, which ignores the combined effect of the two cars on aerodynamic forces. The streamlined structure of the train has different effects on the aerodynamics of the head and tail cars. In-depth study of these effects will help engineers improve their shape design capabilities. Based on the surrogate model method, this paper studies the influence of five shape parameters of the streamlined area on the resistance of the head and tail cars and the lift force of the tail car of CRH380A, and compares the aerodynamic performance of the two optimization schemes. The research results show that the optimization direction for reducing drag of the head car is opposite to that for reducing the drag and lift of the tail car, while the optimization directions for reducing both drag and lift for the tail car alone, are roughly the same. Therefore, the same shaped head and tail cars are problematic for improving aerodynamic performance. After optimization, the head car’s resistance, the tail car’s resistance, and the tail car’s lift of the train with the same shape of head and tail cars are reduced by 1.7%, 0.5%, and 3.5%, respectively. The train with different shapes had values decreased by 5.6%, 1.4%, and 7.5%, respectively. The optimization effect of the latter is more than twice that of the former.

高速列车气动优化

[1]BakerC, 2010. The flow around high speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98(6-7):277-298.

[2]ChenG, LiangXF, LiXB, et al., 2021. Dynamic analysis of the effect of platoon configuration on train aerodynamic performance. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 211:104564.

[3]ChenXD, LiuTH, ZhouXS, et al., 2017. Analysis of the aerodynamic effects of different nose lengths on two trains intersecting in a tunnel at 350 km/h. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 66:77-90.

[4]DengE, YangWC, HeXH, et al., 2021. Aerodynamic response of high-speed trains under crosswind in a bridge-tunnel section with or without a wind barrier. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 210:104502.

[5]DongTY, MinelliG, WangJB, et al., 2020. The effect of reducing the underbody clearance on the aerodynamics of a high-speed train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 204:104249.

[6]GaoGJ, LiF, HeK, et al., 2019. Investigation of bogie positions on the aerodynamic drag and near wake structure of a high-speed train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 185:41-53.

[7]GuoZJ, LiuTH, ChenZW, et al., 2020. Aerodynamic influences of bogie’s geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 196:104053.

[8]HanYD, YaoS, 2017. Scale effect analysis in aerodynamic performance of high-speed train. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 51(12):‍2383-2391 (in Chinese).

[9]HoerlAE, KennardRW, 2000. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 42(1):80-86.

[10]LiT, QinD, ZhangJY, 2019. Effect of RANS turbulence model on aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 32(1):85.

[11]LiT, DaiZY, YuMG, et al., 2021. Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic resistances of double-unit trains with different gap lengths. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 15(1):549-560.

[12]LiWH, LiuTH, ZhangJ, et al., 2017. Aerodynamic study of two opposing moving trains in a tunnel based on different nose contours. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 10(5):1375-1386.

[13]LiZW, YangMZ, HuangS, et al., 2017. A new method to measure the aerodynamic drag of high-speed trains passing through tunnels. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 171:110-120.

[14]LiangXF, LiXB, ChenG, et al., 2020. On the aerodynamic loads when a high speed train passes under an overhead bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 202:104208.

[15]LiuTH, JiangZH, ChenXD, et al., 2019. Wave effects in a realistic tunnel induced by the passage of high-speed trains. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 86:224-235.

[16]Munoz-PaniaguaJ, GarciaJ, 2019. Aerodynamic surrogate-based optimization of the nose shape of a high-speed train for crosswind and passing-by scenarios. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 184:139-152.

[17]Munoz-PaniaguaJ, GarciaJ, 2020. Aerodynamic drag optimization of a high-speed train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 204:104215.

[18]Munoz-PaniaguaJ, GarciaJ, CrespoA, 2014. Genetically aerodynamic optimization of the nose shape of a high-speed train entering a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 130:48-61.

[19]Munoz-PaniaguaJ, GarciaJ, CrespoA, et al., 2015. Aerodynamic optimization of the nose shape of a train using the adjoint method. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 8(3):601-612.

[20]Munoz-PaniaguaJ, GarciaJ, LehugeurB, 2017. Evaluation of RANS, SAS and IDDES models for the simulation of the flow around a high-speed train subjected to crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 171:50-66.

[21]NiuJQ, LiangXF, ZhouD, 2016. Experimental study on the effect of Reynolds number on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train with and without yaw angle. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 157:36-46.

[22]NiuJQ, WangYM, ZhangL, et al., 2018. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train with different train nose lengths. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 127:188-199.

[23]NiuJQ, WangYM, WuD, et al., 2020. Comparison of different configurations of aerodynamic braking plate on the flow around a high-speed train. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1):655-668.

[24]NiuJQ, WangYM, LiuF, et al., 2021. Numerical study on the effect of a downstream braking plate on the detailed flow field and unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of an up-stream braking plate with or without a crosswind. Vehicle System Dynamics, 59(5):657-674.

[25]RaghunathanRS, KimHD, SetoguchiT, 2002. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(6-7):469-514.

[26]SchetzJA, 2001. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 33:371-414.

[27]SunZ, DaiHY, HemidaH, et al., 2019. Safety of high-speed train passing by windbreak breach with different sizes. Vehicle System Dynamics, 58(12):1935-1952.

[28]SunZX, ZhangY, YangGW, 2017. Surrogate based optimization of aerodynamic noise for streamlined shape of high speed trains. Applied Sciences, 7(2):196.

[29]SunZX, YaoSB, WeiLY, et al., 2021. Numerical investigation on the influence of the streamlined structures of the high-speed train’s nose on aerodynamic performances. Applied Sciences, 11(2):784.

[30]VehtariA, GelmanA, GabryJ, 2017. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27(5):1413-1432.

[31]WangJB, GaoGJ, LiXB, et al., 2020a. Effect of bogie fairings on the flow behaviours and aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train. Vehicle System Dynamics, 58(6):890-910.

[32]WangJB, MinelliG, DongTY, et al., 2020b. An IDDES investigation of Jacobs bogie effects on the slipstream and wake flow of a high-speed train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 202:104233.

[33]WangJB, MinelliG, DongTY, et al., 2020c. Impact of the bogies and cavities on the aerodynamic behaviour of a high-speed train. An IDDES study. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 207:104406.

[34]WangJB, MinelliG, MiaoXJ, et al., 2021. The effect of bogie positions on the aerodynamic behavior of a high-speed train: an IDDES study. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 107(2):257-282.

[35]XiaYT, LiuTH, LiWH, et al., 2021. Numerical comparisons of the aerodynamic performances of wind-tunnel train models with different inter-carriage gap spacings under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 214:104680.

[36]XuG, LiangXF, YaoSB, et al., 2017. Multi-objective aero-dynamic optimization of the streamlined shape of high-speed trains based on the Kriging model. PLoS One, 12(1):e0170803.

[37]XuG, LiH, ZhangJ, et al., 2019. Effect of two bogie cavity configurations on the underbody flow and near wake structures of a high-speed train. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 12(6):1945-1955.

[38]YaoSB, GuoDL, YangGW, 2012. Three-dimensional aero-dynamic optimization design of high-speed train nose based on GA-GRNN. Science China Technological Sciences, 55(11):3118-3130.

[39]YaoSB, GuoDL, SunZX, et al., 2014. Optimization design for aerodynamic elements of high speed trains. Computers & Fluids, 95:56-73.

[40]ZhangL, ZhangJY, LiT, et al., 2017. Multi-objective aerodynamic optimization design of high-speed train head shape. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(11):841-854.

[41]ZhangY, YangGW, GuoDL, et al., 2019. A novel CACOR-SVR multi-objective optimization approach and its application in aerodynamic shape optimization of high-speed train. Soft Computing, 23(13):5035-5051.

[42]ZouSM, HeXH, WangHF, 2020. Numerical investigation on the crosswind effects on a train running on a bridge. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1):1458-1471.

[43]ZhouP, LiT, ZhaoCF, et al., 2020. Numerical study on the flow field characteristics of the new high-speed maglev train in open air. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(5):366-381.