Similar articles

Abstract: water-and-mud inrush disasters have become a major challenge in underground engineering for the construction of tunnels in sandstone and slate interbedded Presinian strata. Disaster prediction and prevention rely in part on realistic modeling and observation of the disaster process, as well as the identification and examination of the underlying mechanisms. Based on the geological conditions and the historical records of the Xinping Tunnel on the China‍–‍Laos Railway, an engineering geological model of the water-and-mud inrush was established. A physical model test that accurately reproduced water-and-mud inrush during tunnel excavation in sandstone and slate interbedded strata was also carried out. Then, testing was conducted that examined the stress and strain, seepage pressure, and high-leakage flow of the surrounding rock. The results indicated that the water-and-mud inrush proceeded through three stages: seepage stage, high-leakage flow stage, and attenuation stage. In essence, the disaster was a catastrophic process, during which the water-resistant stratum was reduced to a critical safety thickness, a water-inrush channel formed, and the water-resistant stratum gradually failed under the influence of excavation unloading and in situ stress–seepage coupling. Parameters such as the stress and strain, seepage pressure, and flow of the surrounding rock had evident stage-related features during water-and-mud inrush, and their variation indicated the formation, development, and evolution of the disaster. As the tunnel face advanced, the trend of the stress‍–‍strain curve of the surrounding rock shifted from sluggish to rapid in its speed of increase. The characteristics of strain energy density revealed the erosion and weakening effect of groundwater on the surrounding rock. The seepage pressure and the thickness of the water-resistant stratum had a positive linear relationship, and the flow and thickness a negative linear relationship. There was a pivotal point at which the seepage pressure changed from high to low and the flow shifted from low to high. The thickness of the water-resistant stratum corresponding to the pivotal point was deemed the critical safety thickness.

前震旦系砂岩与板岩互层地层隧道开挖突水突泥灾害机理模型试验

[1]ChooCS, OngDEL, 2020. Assessment of non-linear rock strength parameters for the estimation of pipe-jacking forces. Part 2. Numerical modeling. Engineering Geology, 265:105405.

[2]FanHB, ZhangYH, HeSY, et al., 2018. Hazards and treatment of karst tunneling in Qinling-Daba mountainous area: overview and lessons learnt from Yichang-Wanzhou Railway system. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(19):679.

[3]JiangHM, LiL, RongXL, et al., 2017. Model test to investigate waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 62:35-42.

[4]LiG, MaWB, TianSM, et al., 2021. Groundwater inrush control and parameters optimization of curtain grouting reinforcement for the Jingzhai Tunnel. Geofluids, 2021:6634513.

[5]LiLP, TuWF, ShiSS, et al., 2016. Mechanism of water inrush in tunnel construction in karst area. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(S1):35-46.

[6]LiLP, SunSQ, WangJ, et al., 2020. Experimental study of the precursor information of the water inrush in shield tunnels due to the proximity of a water-filled cave. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 130:104320.

[7]LiSC, LiuHL, LiLP, et al., 2016. Large scale three-dimensional seepage analysis model test and numerical simulation research on undersea tunnel. Applied Ocean Research, 59:510-520.

[8]LiSC, GaoCL, ZhouZQ, et al., 2019. Analysis on the precursor information of water inrush in karst tunnels: a true triaxial model test study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52(2):373-384.

[9]LiangDX, JiangZQ, ZhuSY, et al., 2016. Experimental research on water inrush in tunnel construction. Natural Hazards, 81(1):467-480.

[10]MaD, BaiHB, MiaoXX, et al., 2016. Compaction and seepage properties of crushed limestone particle mixture: an experimental investigation for Ordovician karst collapse pillar groundwater inrush. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(1):11.

[11]OngDEL, JongSC, ChengWC, 2022. Ground and groundwater responses due to shaft excavation in organic soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148(8):05022003.

[12]PanDD, LiSC, XuZH, et al., 2019. Experimental and numerical study of the water inrush mechanisms of underground tunnels due to the proximity of a water-filled karst cavern. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(8):6207-6219.

[13]WangJ, LiSC, LiLP, et al., 2020. Mechanism of water inrush in fractures and block collapse under hydraulic pressure. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 177:625-642.

[14]WangXT, LiSC, XuZH, et al., 2019. Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels excavation based on normal cloud model. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(5):3783-3798.

[15]WuJ, LiSC, XuZH, et al., 2017. Flow characteristics and escape-route optimization after water inrush in a backward-excavated karst tunnel. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(4):04016096.

[16]XuZL, LuoYB, ChenJX, et al., 2021. Mechanical properties and reasonable proportioning of similar materials in physical model test of tunnel lining cracking. Construction and Building Materials, 300:123960.

[17]XueYG, KongFM, LiSC, et al., 2021. Water and mud inrush hazard in underground engineering: genesis, evolution and prevention. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 114:103987.

[18]YangJ, YinZY, LaouafaF, et al., 2019a. Internal erosion in dike-on-foundation modeled by a coupled hydromechanical approach. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 43(3):663-683.

[19]YangJ, YinZY, LaouafaF, et al., 2019b. Modeling coupled erosion and filtration of fine particles in granular media. Acta Geotechnica, 14(6):1615-1627.

[20]YangJ, YinZY, LaouafaF, et al., 2020a. Hydromechanical modeling of granular soils considering internal erosion. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(2):157-172.

[21]YangJ, YinZY, LaouafaF, et al., 2020b. Three-dimensional hydromechanical modeling of internal erosion in dike-on-foundation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 44(8):1200-1218.

[22]YangJ, YinZY, LiuYJ, et al., 2022. Multiphysics modelling of backfill grouting in sandy soils during TBM tunnelling. Acta Geotechnica, in press.

[23]YangWM, FangZD, WangH, et al., 2019a. Analysis on water inrush process of tunnel with large buried depth and high water pressure. Processes, 7(3):134.

[24]YangWM, YangX, FangZD, et al., 2019b. Model test for water inrush caused by karst caves filled with confined water in tunnels. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(24):749.

[25]YangWM, WangMX, ZhouZQ, et al., 2019c. A true triaxial geomechanical model test apparatus for studying the precursory information of water inrush from impermeable rock mass failure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 93:103078.

[26]ZhangSC, GuoWJ, LiYY, et al., 2017. Experimental simulation of fault water inrush channel evolution in a coal mine floor. Mine Water and the Environment, 36(3):443-451.

[27]ZhaoN, WangYC, MengB, et al., 2018. Numerical simulation on the seepage properties of soil-rock mixture. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018:1859319.