CLC number: O159; O22
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2015-12-30
Cited: 0
Clicked: 7630
Xiao-xiong Zhang, Bing-feng Ge, Yue-jin Tan. A consensus model for group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2016, 17(3): 237-249.
@article{title="A consensus model for group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment",
author="Xiao-xiong Zhang, Bing-feng Ge, Yue-jin Tan",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
volume="17",
number="3",
pages="237-249",
year="2016",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/FITEE.1500198"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A consensus model for group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment
%A Xiao-xiong Zhang
%A Bing-feng Ge
%A Yue-jin Tan
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 17
%N 3
%P 237-249
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2016
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1500198
TY - JOUR
T1 - A consensus model for group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment
A1 - Xiao-xiong Zhang
A1 - Bing-feng Ge
A1 - Yue-jin Tan
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 17
IS - 3
SP - 237
EP - 249
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2016
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1500198
Abstract: We propose a new consensus model for group decision making (GDM) problems, using an interval type-2 fuzzy environment. In our model, experts are asked to express their preferences using linguistic terms characterized by interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FSs), because these can provide decision makers with greater freedom to express the vagueness in real-life situations. Consensus and proximity measures based on the arithmetic operations of IT2 FSs are used simultaneously to guide the decision-making process. The majority of previous studies have taken into account only the importance of the experts in the aggregation process, which may give unreasonable results. Thus, we propose a new feedback mechanism that generates different advice strategies for experts according to their levels of importance. In general, experts with a lower level of importance require a larger number of suggestions to change their initial preferences. Finally, we investigate a numerical example and execute comparable models and ours, to demonstrate the performance of our proposed model. The results indicate that the proposed model provides greater insight into the GDM process.
The paper provides a consensus model to deal with a linguistic decision making framework based on type 2 fuzzy sets, and clearly the paper provides novel content on this hot topic related with consensus. The topic is very interesting and the model proposed in this contribution is good.
[1]Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., et al., 2010. A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences. Inform. Sci., 180(23):4477-4495.
[2]Alonso, S., Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., et al., 2013. A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl. Soft Comput., 13(1):149-157.
[3]Cabrerizo, F.J., Moreno, J.M., Pérez, I.J., et al., 2010. Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Comput., 14(5):451-463.
[4]Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Pedrycz, W., 2013. A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 230(3):624-633.
[5]Cabrerizo, F.J., Morente-Molinera, J.A., Pérez, I.J., et al., 2015a. A decision support system to develop a quality management in academic digital libraries. Inform. Sci., 323:48-58.
[6]Cabrerizo, F.J., Chiclana, F., Al-Hmouz, R., et al., 2015b. Fuzzy decision making and consensus: challenges. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 29(3):1109-1118.
[7]Chen, S.M., Lee, L.W., 2010. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl., 37(1):824-833.
[8]Chen, Z., Yang, W., 2011. A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Appl. Math. Model., 35(9):4424-4437.
[9]Chiclana, F., Tapia Garcia, J.M., Del Moral, M.J., et al., 2013. A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inform. Sci., 221:110-123.
[10]Feng, Z.Q., Liu, C., Huang, H., 2014. Knowledge modeling based on interval-valued fuzzy rough set and similarity inference: prediction of welding distortion. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. C (Comput. & Electron.), 15(8):636-650.
[11]Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., et al., 2007. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 15(5):863-877.
[12]Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F.J., Kacprzyk, J., et al., 2014. A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inform. Fus., 17:4-13.
[13]Lee, L.W., Chen, S.M., 2008. A new method for fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, p.3084-3089.
[14]Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E., 2009. An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 17(2):279-290.
[15]Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F., 2006. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 14(6):808-821.
[16]Mendel, J.M., Zadeh, L.A., Trillas, E., et al., 2010. What computing with words means to me. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag., 5(1):20-26.
[17]Moharrer, M., Tahayori, H., Livi, L., et al., 2015. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets to model linguistic label perception in online services satisfaction. Soft Comput., 19(1):237-250.
[18]Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., et al., 2014. A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 44(4):494-498.
[19]Sabahi, F., Akbarzadeh-T, M.R., 2014. A framework for analysis of extended fuzzy logic. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. C (Comput. & Electron.), 15(7):584-591.
[20]Wang, W., Liu, X., Qin, Y., 2012. Multi-attribute group decision making models under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Knowl.-Based Syst., 30:121-128.
[21]Wang, Z.J., Li, K.W., 2015. A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 242(3):890-900.
[22]Wu, D., Mendel, J.M., 2011. On the continuity of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 19(1):179-192.
[23]Wu, J., Chiclana, F., 2014. A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowl.-Based Syst., 59:97-107.
[24]Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., 2015. Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl. Soft Comput., 35:827-839.
[25]Zhang, X., Ge, B., Jiang, J., et al., 2015. A new consensus model for group decision making using fuzzy linguistic preference relations with heterogeneous experts. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30(1):171-182.
[26]Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., 2013. A novel approach to multi attribute group decision making based on trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy soft sets. Appl. Math. Model., 37(7): 4948-4971.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>