Full Text:
<2459>
CLC number: TU991
On-line Access:
Received: 2001-04-05
Revision Accepted: 2001-08-02
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 1
Clicked: 4487
SC response characteristics of two kinds of coagulant
| |||||||||||||
YANG Wan-dong, SONG Shuang, SHI Hui-xiang. SC response characteristics of two kinds of coagulant[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2002, 3(3): 268-271.
@article{title="SC response characteristics of two kinds of coagulant",
author="YANG Wan-dong, SONG Shuang, SHI Hui-xiang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="3",
number="3",
pages="268-271",
year="2002",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2002.0268"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T SC response characteristics of two kinds of coagulant
%A YANG Wan-dong
%A SONG Shuang
%A SHI Hui-xiang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 3
%N 3
%P 268-271
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2002
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2002.0268
TY - JOUR
T1 - SC response characteristics of two kinds of coagulant
A1 - YANG Wan-dong
A1 - SONG Shuang
A1 - SHI Hui-xiang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 3
IS - 3
SP - 268
EP - 271
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2002
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2002.0268
Abstract: Automatic coagulant dosage control with streaming current (SC) technique is introduced in this paper. Aluminum and ferric coagulants are widely used in surface water treatment. The SC response characteristics of P-AlCl3 aluminum coagulant and P-FeCl3 ferric coagulant were investigated in this work. Bench-scale water treatment results were obtained from jar tests including rapid mixing, flocculation and undisturbed sedimentation. Results showed that aluminum coagulant is more sensitive than ferric coagulant to SC response.
[1] Barron, W., Murray, B. S., Scales, P. J., Healy, T. W., Dixon, D. R., Pascoe, M., 1994.The streaming current detectors: a comparison with conventional electrokinetic techniques. Colloids Surfaces, 88:129-139.
[2] Bernazeau, F., Pieronne, P., Dueguet, J. P., 1992. Interest in using a streaming current detector for automatic coagulant dose control - organics removal and safety. Water Supply, 10:87-96.
[3] Cui Fuyi, Li Guibai, Qu Jiuhui, 1991. The principle of the streaming current and its detection and application. Water & Wastewater Engineering., 4: 16-19
[4] Dentel, S. K., Kingery, K. M., 1989. Using streaming current detectors in water treatment. J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 91:85-94
[5] Dentel, S. K., Abu-Orf, M. M.,1993. Applications of the streaming current detectors in sludge conditioner selection and control. Wat.Sci.Tech., 28:169-179.
[6] Gergory, J., 1985.Turbidity fluctuations in flowing suspensions. J. Colloid interface Sci., 105:357-371.
[7] Lin, M. C., Liu, J. C., 1996a. Adsorbing colloid flotation of AS(V)-feasibility of utilizing streaming current detector. Sep. Sci. Tech., 31:1629-1641.
[8] Lin, M. C., Liu, J. C., 1996b. Adsorbing colloid flotation of AS(V) - feasibility of utilizing streaming current detector. Sep. Sci. Tech., 31:2335-2349.
[9] Wu, M. D., 1993. Application of streaming current monitor for the automatic control of coagulation reaction. M.S. Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan Institute of Technology, Taipei(in Chinese).
[10] Zhang Qingyu, 2000. A knowledge-based system for waste minimzation in metal finishing and electroplating industries. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 1:39-47.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>