CLC number: S826.5; S816.71
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 2
Clicked: 6860
WU Yue-ming, HU Wei-lian, LIU Jian-xin. Effects of supplementary urea-minerals lick block on the kinetics of fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization of low quality roughages[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2005, 6(8): 793-797.
@article{title="Effects of supplementary urea-minerals lick block on the kinetics of fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization of low quality roughages",
author="WU Yue-ming, HU Wei-lian, LIU Jian-xin",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="6",
number="8",
pages="793-797",
year="2005",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2005.B0793"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Effects of supplementary urea-minerals lick block on the kinetics of fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization of low quality roughages
%A WU Yue-ming
%A HU Wei-lian
%A LIU Jian-xin
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 6
%N 8
%P 793-797
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2005
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0793
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of supplementary urea-minerals lick block on the kinetics of fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization of low quality roughages
A1 - WU Yue-ming
A1 - HU Wei-lian
A1 - LIU Jian-xin
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 6
IS - 8
SP - 793
EP - 797
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2005
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0793
Abstract: Three yearling lambs with a rumen cannula were used to investigate the effects of supplementation with an urea-minerals lick block (ULB) on the kinetics of ruminal fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen (N) utilization of rice straw (RS), ammonia bicarbonate (AB)‑treated RS (ABRS) and hay prepared from natural pasture. The digestibility of dry matter and organic matter of RS increased by 13.1% and 12.7% (P<0.05) when the diet was supplemented with ULB, and approached to that of ABRS, indicating that the effect of ULB on digestibility of RS is similar to that of AB treatment. The digestibility of ABRS was slightly improved by the ULB feeding. Nitrogen retention was highest in lambs fed on ABRS alone, followed by hay with ULB, and was lowest in animals fed on RS with ULB. However, both the amount and proportion of N retention to N intake were enhanced by ULB supplementation to lambs fed on hay. The proportion of N retained to N digested decreased due to ULB supplementation to lambs fed on RS or ABRS. Supplementing ULB did not greatly influence the rumen degradation of either dry matter or crude protein in each of the three diets. RS and hay had similar values in the potential extent of digestion (PED) and digestion rate of PED (kd) of fibrous materials, but the discrete lag time for RS was lower than that for hay. The AB treatment significantly increased the PED (P<0.05) and kd (P<0.05) of RS. Neither the PED nor kd for RS and ABRS was influenced by ULB supplementation, but the kd for hay significantly increased due to ULB. The lag time for hay was also shortened by the ULB feeding. The ULB improved the digestion of fibre in the rumen of lambs fed on low quality roughage. It is inferred that while ULB is effective in increasing nutrient digestibility of low quality roughages by improving ruminal fibre digestion. A synchronized supply of N and energy to rumen microbes should be considered to improve the efficiency of N utilization when the basal diet is ammoniated straw.
[1] AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists), 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Ed., Vol. 1, AOAC, Washington, DC, p.69-90.
[2] ARC (Agricultural Research Council), 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Suppl.1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, London, UK, p.351-360.
[3] Chen, Y.Z., Wen, H., Ma, X., Li, Y., Gao, Z., Peterson, M.A., 1993. Multinutrient lick blocks for dairy cattle in Gansu Province, China. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 5(3):60-63.
[4] Goering, H.K., van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage Fibre Analyses. In: Agricultural Handbook, No. 37. USDA, Washington, DC.
[5] Grevum, W.J., Williams, V.J., 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition, 30:313-319.
[6] Hadjipanayiotou, M., Verhaeghe, L., Allen, M., Kronfoleh, A.R., Al-Wadi, M., Amin, M., Naigm, T., El-Said, H., Al-Haress, A.K., 1993a. Urea blocks. I. Methodology of block making and different formulae tested in Syria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 5(3):6-15.
[7] Hadjipanayiotou, M., Verhaeghe, L., Kronfoleh, A.R., Labban, L.M., Amin, M., Al-Wadi, M., Badran, A., Dawa, K., Shurbaji, A., Houssein, M., et al., 1993b. Urea blocks. II. Performance of cattle and sheep offered urea blocks in Syria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 5(3):16-23.
[8] Huang, B.Y., Xiong, Y.Q., 1990. Effect of dietary concentrate level on ruminal fibre digestion kinetics. Acta Zoonutrimenta Sinica, 2(2):30-35.
[9] Kunju, P.J.G., 1986. Urea Molasses Block Lick-a Feed Supplement for Ruminants. In: Ibrahim, M.N.N., Schiere, J.B. (Eds.), Rice Straw and Related Feeds in Ruminant Rations. SUP Publication No. 2, Kandy Offset Printers Ltd., Sri Lanka, p.261-274.
[10] Liu, J.X., Xu, N.Y., Wu, Y.M., Dai, X.M., Han, Y.G., 1991. Ammonia bicarbonate as a source of ammonia for improving the nutritive value of rice straw. China Feed, Suppl.:87-92 (in Chinese).
[11] Liu, J.X., Wu, Y.M., Xu, N.Y., 1995. Effects of ammonia bicarbonate treatment on liveweight gain, kinetics of fibre digestion, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization of rice straw by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 52:131-139.
[12] Liu, J.X., Dai, X.M., Yao, J., Zhou, Y.Y., Chen, Y.J., 1996. Effect of urea-mineral lick block feeding on liveweight gain of local yellow cattle and goats in grazing conditions. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 7(2):9-13.
[13] Mertens, D.R., Loften, J.R., 1980. The effect of starch on forage fibre digestion kinetics in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science, 63:1437-1446.
[14] Ørskov, E.R., 1985. Evaluation of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products using the nylon bag method. Research and Development in Agriculture, 4(2):65-69.
[15] Preston, T.R., 1986. Better Utilization of Crop Residues and By-products in Animal Feeding: Research Guidelines. 2. A Practical Manual for Research Workers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, p.20-25, 32-35.
[16] Steel, R.D.G., Torrie, J.H., 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p.132-194, 363-372.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>