Full Text:   <2024>

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2020-06-10

Received: 2020-04-23

Revision Accepted: 2020-04-27

Crosschecked: 2020-05-15

Cited: 0

Clicked: 2726

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Zhen-yu Yin

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-7304

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2020 Vol.21 No.6 P.407-411

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A20AIGE1


Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering


Author(s):  Zhen-yu Yin, Yin-fu Jin, Zhong-qiang Liu

Affiliation(s):  Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   zhenyu.yin@polyu.edu.hk, yinfu.jin9019@gmail.com, zhongqiang.liu@ngi.no

Key Words:  Artificial intelligence, Geotechnical engineering, Big data


Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Zhen-yu Yin, Yin-fu Jin, Zhong-qiang Liu. Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2020, 21(6): 407-411.

@article{title="Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering",
author="Zhen-yu Yin, Yin-fu Jin, Zhong-qiang Liu",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="21",
number="6",
pages="407-411",
year="2020",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A20AIGE1"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering
%A Zhen-yu Yin
%A Yin-fu Jin
%A Zhong-qiang Liu
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 21
%N 6
%P 407-411
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2020
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A20AIGE1

TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering
A1 - Zhen-yu Yin
A1 - Yin-fu Jin
A1 - Zhong-qiang Liu
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 21
IS - 6
SP - 407
EP - 411
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2020
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A20AIGE1


Abstract: 
geotechnical engineering deals with materials (e.g. soil and rock) that, by their very nature, exhibit varied and uncertain behavior due to the imprecise physical processes associated with their formation. Modeling the behavior of such materials in geotechnical engineering applications is complex and sometimes beyond the ability of most traditional forms of physically-based engineering methods. In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in a wide range of geotechnical engineering has grown rapidly. AI can be very useful in solving problems where deterministic solutions are not available or are excessively expensive in terms of computational cost but for which there are significant observations and data available. Due to the nature of materials, geotechnical engineering deals with more uncertainties than other fields of civil and mechanical engineering. There is also much monitoring and site investigation data in geotechnical engineering which needs to be taken advantage of by using data analytic methods. Therefore, AI can be a suitable and effective alternative route to solving geotechnical engineering problems and significant developments have been made in recent years as much attention has been given to the area.

人工智能在岩土工程中的实践

概要:岩土材料的复杂和不确定性致使传统理论在模拟和预测岩土工程问题经常显得无能为力. 近年来,随着人工智能和大数据技术的快速发展,人工智能技术在岩土工程领域有了广泛应用,例如岩土参数的优化智能识别和预测、边坡变形的长期预测、基坑开挖过程变形的实时监测和预测以及盾构隧道的变形和盾构机刀盘参数的预测和更新等. 为此,本专辑收集了在该研究领域具有代表性的研究成果,介绍了人工智能技术在岩土工程领域的进展和未来发展潜力,希望能帮助读者快速了解人工智能技术在岩土工程中的应用,以及推动岩土工程的智能化发展,为实现岩土工程智能化提供科学依据和技术支撑.
关键词:人工智能; 岩土工程; 大数据

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Chen RP, Lin XT, Kang X, et al., 2018. Deformation and stress characteristics of existing twin tunnels induced by close-distance EPBS under-crossing. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 82:468-481.

[2]Chen RP, Zhang P, Kang X, et al., 2019a. Prediction of maximum surface settlement caused by earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling with ANN methods. Soils and Foundations, 59(2):284-295.

[3]Chen RP, Zhang P, Wu HN, et al., 2019b. Prediction of shield tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning techniques. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 13(6):1363-1378.

[4]Cheng ZL, Zhou WH, Ding Z, et al., 2020. Estimation of spatiotemporal response of rooted soil using a machine learning approach. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):462-477.

[5]Gao MY, Zhang N, Shen SL, et al., 2020. Real-time dynamic earth-pressure regulation model for shield tunneling by integrating GRU deep learning method with GA optimization. IEEE Access, 8:64310-64323.

[6]Godoy C, Depina I, Thakur V, 2020. Application of machine learning to the identification of quick and highly sensitive clays from cone penetration tests. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):445-461.

[7]Goh ATC, Wong KS, Broms BB, 1995. Estimation of lateral wall movements in braced excavations using neural networks. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 32(6):59-64.

[8]Hashash YMA, Levasseur S, Osouli A, et al., 2010. Comparison of two inverse analysis techniques for learning deep excavation response. Computers and Geotechnics, 37(3):323-333.

[9]Hashash YMA, Song H, Osouli A, 2011. Three-dimensional inverse analyses of a deep excavation in Chicago clays. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 35(9):1059-1075.

[10]Huang ZH, Zhang LL, Cheng SY, et al., 2014. Back-analysis and parameter identification for deep excavation based on Pareto multiobjective optimization. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 28(6):A4014007.

[11]Jan JC, Hung SL, Chi SY, et al., 2002. Neural network forecast model in deep excavation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 16(1):59-65.

[12]Javadi A, Rezania M, 2009. Applications of artificial intelligence and data mining techniques in soil modeling. Geomechanics and Engineering, 1(1):53-74.

[13]Jin YF, Yin ZY, Zhou WH, et al., 2019a. Identifying parameters of advanced soil models using an enhanced transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Acta Geotechnica, 14(6):1925-1947.

[14]Jin YF, Yin ZY, Zhou WH, et al., 2019b. Multi-objective optimization-based updating of predictions during excavation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78:102-123.

[15]Jin YF, Yin ZY, Zhou WH, et al., 2019c. A single-objective EPR based model for creep index of soft clays considering L2 regularization. Engineering Geology, 248:242-255.

[16]Kung GTC, Hsiao ECL, Schuster M, et al., 2007. A neural network approach to estimating deflection of diaphragm walls caused by excavation in clays. Computers and Geotechnics, 34(5):385-396.

[17]Liu ZQ, Guo D, Lacasse S, et al., 2020. Algorithms for intelligent prediction of landslide displacements. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):412-429.

[18]Lu SL, Zhang N, Shen SL, et al., 2020. A deep-learning method for evaluating shaft resistance of the cast-in-site pile on reclaimed ground using field data. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):496-508.

[19]Lü Q, Chan CL, Low BK, 2012. Probabilistic evaluation of ground-support interaction for deep rock excavation using artificial neural network and uniform design. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 32:1-18.

[20]Makantasis K, Protopapadakis E, Doulamis A, et al., 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks for efficient vision based tunnel inspection. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, p.335-342.

[21]Man H, Furukawa T, 2011. Neural network constitutive modelling for non-linear characterization of anisotropic materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 85(8):939-957.

[22]Miranda TFS, 2007. Geomechanical Parameters Evaluation in Underground Structures: Artificial Intelligence, Bayesian Probabilities and Inverse Methods. PhD Thesis, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal, p.291.

[23]Mitchell JK, Soga K, 2005. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 3rd Edition. Wiley, Hoboken, USA.

[24]Nawari NO, Liang R, Nusairat J, 1999. Artificial intelligence techniques for the design and analysis of deep foundations. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 4:1-21.

[25]Pirnia P, Duhaime F, Manashti J, 2018. Machine learning algorithms for applications in geotechnical engineering. GeoEdmonton 2018.

[26]Rashidian V, Hassanlourad M, 2013. Application of an artificial neural network for modeling the mechanical behavior of carbonate soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14(1):142-150.

[27]Rechea C, Levasseur S, Finno R, 2008. Inverse analysis techniques for parameter identification in simulation of excavation support systems. Computers and Geotechnics, 35(3):331-345.

[28]Shahin MA, 2013. Artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: applications, modeling aspects, and future directions. In: Yang XS (Ed.), Metaheuristics in Water, Geotechnical and Transport Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherland, p.169-204.

[29]Shahin MA, 2016. State-of-the-art review of some artificial intelligence applications in pile foundations. Geoscience Frontiers, 7(1):33-44.

[30]Sun YX, Zhang LL, Yang HQ, et al., 2020. Characterization of spatial variability with observed responses: application of displacement back estimation. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):478-495.

[31]Turk G, Logar J, Majes B, 2001. Modelling soil behaviour in uniaxial strain conditions by neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 32(10-11):805-812.

[32]van Boven B, van der Putten P, Åström A, et al., 2018. Real-time excavation detection at construction sites using deep learning. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, p.340-352.

[33]Wang K, Sun WC, 2018. A multiscale multi-permeability poroplasticity model linked by recursive homogenizations and deep learning. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 334:337-380.

[34]Wang K, Sun WC, Du Q, 2019. A cooperative game for automated learning of elasto-plasticity knowledge graphs and models with AI-guided experimentation. Computational Mechanics, 64(2):467-499.

[35]Yang BB, Yin KL, Lacasse S, et al., 2019. Time series analysis and long short-term memory neural network to predict landslide displacement. Landslides, 16(4):677-694.

[36]Yin ZY, Jin YF, Shen JS, et al., 2018. Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: comparative study and enhancement. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 42(1):70-94.

[37]Zhang DM, Zhang JZ, Huang HW, et al., 2020. Machine learning-based prediction of soil compression modulus with application of 1D settlement. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(6):430-444.

[38]Zhang P, 2019. A novel feature selection method based on global sensitivity analysis with application in machine learning-based prediction model. Applied Soft Computing, 85:105859.

[39]Zhang P, Chen RP, Wu HN, 2019. Real-time analysis and regulation of EPB shield steering using random forest. Automation in Construction, 106:102860.

[40]Zhang P, Yin ZY, Jin YF, et al., 2020a. A novel hybrid surrogate intelligent model for creep index prediction based on particle swarm optimization and random forest. Engineering Geology, 265:105328.

[41]Zhang P, Chen RP, Wu HN, et al., 2020b. Ground settlement induced by tunneling crossing interface of water-bearing mixed ground: a lesson from Changsha, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 96:103224.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2022 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE