CLC number:
On-line Access: 2025-02-28
Received: 2023-07-21
Revision Accepted: 2023-12-02
Crosschecked: 2025-02-28
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1127
Hui WANG, Bo ZHOU. A novel shear damage model of the shear deformation and failure process of gas hydrate-bearing sediments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2025, 26(2): 151-165.
@article{title="A novel shear damage model of the shear deformation and failure process of gas hydrate-bearing sediments",
author="Hui WANG, Bo ZHOU",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="26",
number="2",
pages="151-165",
year="2025",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2300373"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A novel shear damage model of the shear deformation and failure process of gas hydrate-bearing sediments
%A Hui WANG
%A Bo ZHOU
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 26
%N 2
%P 151-165
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2025
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2300373
TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel shear damage model of the shear deformation and failure process of gas hydrate-bearing sediments
A1 - Hui WANG
A1 - Bo ZHOU
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 26
IS - 2
SP - 151
EP - 165
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2025
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2300373
Abstract: A novel shear damage model based on homogenization theory and a modified Mohr-Coulomb criterion is proposed to predict the full deformation process of gas hydrate-bearing sediments (GHBSs) during shearing by analyzing micro-mechanisms of shear deformation and failure characteristics. Then, the physical significance of the model’s parameters is explored. Finally, the damage evolution and shear stress partition inside GHBSs during the shearing process are analyzed in detail. The results show that model parameters have clear physical meaning, and the shear damage model is capable of reflecting the nonlinear deformation and strain softening characteristics of GHBSs due to its ability to better describe the damage evolution and shear stress partition mechanisms inside GHBSs during the shearing process. Comparisons of experimental and theoretical results show that the global performance of the novel shear damage model is satisfactory. The model is expected to be widely adopted to analyze submarine landslide instability due to hydrate dissociation.
[1]BaiB, ZhouR, YangGC, et al., 2023. The constitutive behavior and dissociation effect of hydrate-bearing sediment within a granular thermodynamic framework. Ocean Engineering, 268:113408.
[2]BrugadaJ, ChengYP, SogaK, et al., 2010. Discrete element modelling of geomechanical behaviour of methane hydrate soils with pore-filling hydrate distribution. Granular Matter, 12(5):517-525.
[3]ChaouachiM, FalentyA, SellK, et al., 2015. Microstructural evolution of gas hydrates in sedimentary matrices observed with synchrotron X-ray computed tomographic microscopy. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 16(6):1711-1722.
[4]DeusnerC, GuptaS, XieXG, et al., 2019. Strain rate-dependent hardening-softening characteristics of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20(11):4885-4905.
[5]DongL, LiYL, LiaoHL, et al., 2020. Strength estimation for hydrate-bearing sediments based on triaxial shearing tests. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 184:106478.
[6]FangH, ShiK, YuY, 2022. A state-dependent subloading constitutive model with unified hardening function for gas hydrate-bearing sediments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(7):4441-4471.
[7]FarahaniMV, HassanpouryouzbandA, YangJH, et al., 2021a. Development of a coupled geophysical-geothermal scheme for quantification of hydrates in gas hydrate-bearing permafrost sediments. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23(42):24249-24264.
[8]FarahaniMV, HassanpouryouzbandA, YangJH, 2021b. Insights into the climate-driven evolution of gas hydrate-bearing permafrost sediments: implications for prediction of environmental impacts and security of energy in cold regions. RSC Advances, 11(24):14334-14346.
[9]Hallinan JrAJ, 1993. A review of the Weibull distribution. Journal of Quality Technology, 25(2):85-93.
[10]HouGD, LiangDQ, LiXS, 2018. Experimental study on hydrate anti-agglomeration in the presence of rhamnolipid. RSC Advances, 8(69):39511-39519.
[11]HyodoM, LiYH, YonedaJ, et al., 2013a. Mechanical behavior of gas-saturated methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(10):5185-5194.
[12]HyodoM, YonedaJ, YoshimotoN, et al., 2013b. Mechanical and dissociation properties of methane hydrate-bearing sand in deep seabed. Soils and Foundations, 53(2):299-314.
[13]HyodoM, LiYH, YonedaJ, et al., 2014. Effects of dissociation on the shear strength and deformation behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 51:52-62.
[14]HyodoM, WuY, NakashimaK, et al., 2017. Influence of fines content on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(10):7511-7524.
[15]JiYK, HouJ, CuiGD, et al., 2019. Experimental study on methane hydrate formation in a partially saturated sandstone using low-field NMR technique. Fuel, 251:82-90.
[16]JiaYG, ZhuCQ, LiuLP, et al., 2016. Marine geohazards: review and future perspective. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 90(4):1455-1470.
[17]JiangMJ, ChenH, TapiasM, et al., 2014. Study of mechanical behavior and strain localization of methane hydrate bearing sediments with different saturations by a new DEM model. Computers and Geotechnics, 57:122-138.
[18]JiangMJ, LiuJ, ShenZF, 2019. DEM simulation of grain-coating type methane hydrate bearing sediments along various stress paths. Engineering Geology, 261:105280.
[19]KajiyamaS, HyodoM, NakataY, et al., 2017. Shear behaviour of methane hydrate bearing sand with various particle characteristics and fines. Soils and Foundations, 57(2):176-193.
[20]KvenvoldenKA, 1998. A primer on the geological occurrence of gas hydrate. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 137:9-30.
[21]KvenvoldenKA, 1999. Potential effects of gas hydrate on human welfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(7):3420-3426.
[22]LaiY, LiS, QiJ, et al., 2008. Strength distributions of warm frozen clay and its stochastic damage constitutive model. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 53(2):200-215.
[23]LeiL, SeolY, ChoiJH, et al., 2019. Pore habit of methane hydrate and its evolution in sediment matrix–laboratory visualization with phase-contrast micro-CT. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 104:451-467.
[24]LiCF, LiuCL, HuGW, et al., 2019. Investigation on the multiparameter of hydrate-bearing sands using nano-focus X-ray computed tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124(3):2286-2296.
[25]LiDL, WangZ, LiangDQ, et al., 2019. Effect of clay content on the mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments during hydrate production via depressurization. Energies, 12(14):2684.
[26]LiuZC, WeiHZ, PengL, et al., 2017. An easy and efficient way to evaluate mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments: the direct shear test. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 149:56-64.
[27]LiuZC, DaiS, NingFL, et al., 2018. Strength estimation for hydrate-bearing sediments from direct shear tests of hydrate-bearing sand and silt. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(2):715-723.
[28]LuoTT, LiYH, MadhusudhanBN, et al., 2020. Deformation behaviors of hydrate-bearing silty sediment induced by depressurization and thermal recovery. Applied Energy, 276:115468.
[29]MasuiA, HanedaH, OgataY, et al., 2005. The effect of saturation degree of methane hydrate on the shear strength of synthetic methane hydrate sediments. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, p.657-663.
[30]MiyazakiK, MasuiA, SakamotoY, et al., 2011. Triaxial compressive properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 116(B6):B06102.
[31]MiyazakiK, TenmaN, AokiK, et al., 2012. A nonlinear elastic model for triaxial compressive properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment samples. Energies, 5(10):4057-4075.
[32]NgCWW, BaghbanrezvanS, KadlicekT, et al., 2020. A state-dependent constitutive model for methane hydrate-bearing sediments inside the stability region. Géotechnique, 70(12):1094-1108.
[33]NgCWW, LauSY, ZhangQ, et al., 2023. A state-dependent constitutive model for gas hydrate-bearing sediment incorporating phase change. Gas Science and Engineering, 119:205102.
[34]PinkertS, 2017. Rowe’s stress-dilatancy theory for hydrate-bearing sand. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(1):06016008.
[35]PinkertS, GrozicJLH, PriestJA, 2015. Strain-softening model for hydrate-bearing sands. International Journal of Geomechanics, 15(6):04015007.
[36]RenJJ, LiuXH, NiuMY, et al., 2022a. Effect of sodium montmorillonite clay on the kinetics of CH4 hydrate-implication for energy recovery. Chemical Engineering Journal, 437:135368.
[37]RenJJ, YinZY, LiQP, et al., 2022b. Pore-scale investigation of CH4 hydrate kinetics in clayey-silty sediments by low-field NMR. Energy & Fuels, 36(24):14874-14887.
[38]ShenJ, ChiuCF, NgCWW, et al., 2016. A state-dependent critical state model for methane hydrate-bearing sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 75:1-11.
[39]SkemptonAW, 1985. Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory. Géotechnique, 35(1):3-18.
[40]Sloan JrED, 2003. Fundamental principles and applications of natural gas hydrates. Nature, 426(6964):353-359.
[41]Sloan JrED, KohCA, 2007. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. 3rd Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
[42]SongYC, WangSL, YangMJ, et al., 2015. MRI measurements of CO2–CH4 hydrate formation and dissociation in porous media. Fuel, 140:126-135.
[43]SongYC, ZhuYM, LiuWG, et al., 2016. The effects of methane hydrate dissociation at different temperatures on the stability of porous sediments. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147:77-86.
[44]SternLA, KirbySH, DurhamWB, 1998. Polycrystalline methane hydrate: synthesis from superheated ice, and low-temperature mechanical properties. Energy & Fuels, 12(2):201-211.
[45]UchidaS, XieXG, LeungYF, 2016. Role of critical state framework in understanding geomechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8):5580-5595.
[46]WangH, ChenYQ, ZhouB, et al., 2021. Investigation of the effect of cementing ratio on the mechanical properties and strain location of hydrate-bearing sediments by using DEM. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 94:104123.
[47]WangYX, WangR, YuJK, et al., 2023. SPF-MHBS: a stress partition constitutive framework for methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Acta Geotechnica, 18(4):1919-1944.
[48]WuP, LiYH, LiuWG, et al., 2020. Cementation failure behavior of consolidated gas hydrate-bearing sand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(1):e2019JB018623.
[49]WuP, WangHJ, HuangL, et al., 2023. Pore-scale analysis of hydrate saturation on the physical parameters of hydrate-bearing sediment with different particle shapes. Gas Science and Engineering, 116:205052.
[50]XieSJ, LinH, ChenYF, et al., 2020a. A damage constitutive model for shear behavior of joints based on determination of the yield point. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 128:104269.
[51]XieSJ, LinH, WangYX, et al., 2020b. A statistical damage constitutive model considering whole joint shear deformation. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 29(6):988-1008.
[52]XuJL, WangR, XuCS, et al., 2023. Application and improvement of a stress partition framework-based methane hydrate-bearing sediment constitutive model for wide range confining stress. Computers and Geotechnics, 159:105463.
[53]XuM, SongEX, JiangH, et al., 2016. DEM simulation of the undrained shear behavior of sand containing dissociated gas hydrate. Granular Matter, 18(4):79.
[54]YanCL, ChengYF, LiML, et al., 2017. Mechanical experiments and constitutive model of natural gas hydrate reservoirs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(31):19810-19818.
[55]YangMJ, SongYC, JiangLL, et al., 2014. Hydrate-based technology for CO2 capture from fossil fuel power plants. Applied Energy, 116:26-40.
[56]YonedaJ, MasuiA, KonnoY, et al., 2015. Mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing turbidite reservoir in the first gas production test site of the eastern Nankai Trough. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 66:471-486.
[57]YonedaJ, JinY, KatagiriJ, et al., 2016. Strengthening mechanism of cemented hydrate-bearing sand at microscales. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(14):7442-7450.
[58]YuF, SongYC, LiuWG, et al., 2011. Analyses of stress strain behavior and constitutive model of artificial methane hydrate. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 77(2):183-188.
[59]YunTS, SantamarinaJC, RuppelC, 2007. Mechanical properties of sand, silt, and clay containing tetrahydrofuran hydrate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112(B4):B04106.
[60]ZhangJD, LiuXH, ChenDY, et al., 2022. An investigation on the permeability of hydrate-bearing sediments based on pore-scale CFD simulation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 192:122901.
[61]ZhangN, WangHN, JiangMJ, 2022. A mesoelastic-plastic damage model for hydrate-bearing sediments with various hydrate-growth patterns. Ocean Engineering, 266:112919.
[62]ZhangXH, LinJ, LuXB, et al., 2018. A hypoplastic model for gas hydrate-bearing sandy sediments. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 42(7):931-942.
[63]ZhouM, SogaK, YamamotoK, 2018. Upscaled anisotropic methane hydrate critical state model for turbidite hydrate-bearing sediments at east Nankai Trough. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(8):6277-6298.
[64]ZhuCQ, ZhangMS, LiuXL, et al., 2017. Gas hydrates: production, geohazards and monitoring. Journal of Catastrophology, 32(3):51-56 (in Chinese).
[65]ZouZX, YanJB, TangHM, et al., 2020. A shear constitutive model for describing the full process of the deformation and failure of slip zone soil. Engineering Geology, 276:105766.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>