Similar articles

Abstract: We develop assembled reinforcement structures (ARSs) composed of connection parts, connecting rods, and straight bolts to strengthen segmental joints in the lining of shield tunnels. Through full-scale bending experiments and numerical simulations, we investigate the deformation and failure characteristics of segmental joints strengthened by ARSs, and propose a novel optimization method for ARSs. The experimental results show that the ARSs can effectively limit the opening of a segmental joint, but also that separation can occur during loading if the connection between the ARSs and segments is not designed properly. Importantly, this connection can be improved by embedding anchor parts in the concrete. In numerical modeling, we investigate the failure modes of segmental joints strengthened by ARSs for both positive bending and negative bending loading cases. In the case of positive bending loading, first the concrete around the anchor parts cracks, and subsequently the concrete on the external side of the joint is crushed. The joint failure is caused by the crushing of concrete on the external side of the joint. While the un-strengthened segmental joint fails with an opening of 5.884 mm, the strengthened segmental joint only opens by 0.288 mm under the same loading, corresponding to a reduction of 95.1%. In the case of negative bending loading, the concrete around the anchor parts first cracks, and then the amount of joint opening exceeds a limiting value for waterproofing (6 mm), i.e., the joint’s failure is caused by water leakage. While the opening of the un-strengthened segmental joint is 9.033 mm and experiences waterproofing failure, the opening of the strengthened segmental joint is only 2.793 mm under the same loading, corresponding to a reduction of 69.1%. When constructing a new shield tunnel, anchor parts could be embedded in the concrete segments in tandem with ARSs for improved resistance to joint opening. For existing shield tunnel linings, anchor parts cannot be embedded in the concrete segments; therefore, the connections between the ARSs and concrete need to be optimized to strengthen the segmental joint.

拼装式增强结构加固盾构隧道管片衬砌接缝力学特性研究

[1]AvanakiMJ, HoseiniA, VahdaniS, et al., 2018. Numerical-aided design of fiber reinforced concrete tunnel segment joints subjected to seismic loads. Construction and Building Materials, 170:40-54.

[2]DoNA, DiasD, OresteP, 2014. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of mechanized twin stacked tunnels in soft ground. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 15(11):896-913.

[3]GongWP, HuangHW, JuangCH, et al., 2015. Improved shield tunnel design methodology incorporating design robustness. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52(10):1575-1591.

[4]HeZS, SupasitS, AkiyamaM, et al., 2020. Life-cycle reliability-based design and reliability updating of reinforced concrete shield tunnels in coastal regions. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(4):726-737.

[5]HuangHW, ZhangDM, 2016. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: characterization and field application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 51:301-312.

[6]HuangHW, ShaoH, ZhangDM, et al., 2017. Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: a case study. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(3):345-360.

[7]JinH, YuKW, GongQM, et al., 2018. Load-carrying capability of shield tunnel damaged by shield shell squeezing action during construction. Thin-Walled Structures, 132:69-78.

[8]LeeWF, IshiharaK, 2010. Forensic diagnosis of a shield tunnel failure. Engineering Structures, 32(7):1830-1837.

[9]LiZ, LiuXZ, LaiHR, et al., 2023. Detailed damage mechanism of deformed shield tunnel linings reinforced by steel plates. Engineering Failure Analysis, 143:106850.

[10]LiuDJ, WangF, ZhangDM, et al., 2019. Interfacial stresses of shield tunnel strengthened by a thin plate at inner surface. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 91:103021.

[11]LiuDJ, WangF, HuQF, et al., 2020. Structural responses and treatments of shield tunnel due to leakage: a case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 103:103471.

[12]LiuTJ, ChenSW, LinPQ, et al., 2022. Failure mechanism and strengthening effect of shield tunnel lining reinforced by steel plates with corbels. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 26(4):1603-1621.

[13]LiuX, JiangZJ, ZhangLL, 2017. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of deformed segmental tunnel linings strengthened by epoxy-bonded filament wound profiles. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(10):1268-1283.

[14]LiuX, JiangZJ, YuanY, et al., 2018. Numerical investigation of the mechanical behavior of deformed segmental tunnel linings, strengthened by epoxy-bonded filament wound profiles. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 78:231-244.

[15]WangSM, PengXY, ZhouH, et al., 2023. Deformation control criterion of shield tunnel under lateral relaxation of soft soil. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(5):780-795.

[16]WuB, OuYL, 2014. Experimental study on tunnel lining joints temporarily strengthened by SMA bolts. Smart Materials and Structures, 23(12):125018.

[17]WuHN, XuYS, ShenSL, et al., 2011. Long-term settlement behavior of ground around shield tunnel due to leakage of water in soft deposit of Shanghai. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 5(2):194-198.

[18]YeXW, ZhangXL, ChenYB, et al., 2024. Prediction of maximum upward displacement of shield tunnel linings during construction using particle swarm optimization-random forest algorithm. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 25(1):1-17.

[19]ZhaiWZ, ChapmanD, ZhangDM, et al., 2020. Experimental study on the effectiveness of strengthening over-deformed segmental tunnel lining by steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 104:103530.

[20]ZhangJL, LiuX, RenTY, et al., 2022. Numerical analysis of tunnel segments strengthened by steel–concrete composites. Underground Space, 7(6):1115-1124.

[21]ZhaoHL, LiuX, BaoYH, et al., 2016. Simplified nonlinear simulation of shield tunnel lining reinforced by epoxy bonded steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 51:362-371.

[22]ZhengG, CuiT, ChengXS, et al., 2017. Study of the collapse mechanism of shield tunnels due to the failure of segments in sandy ground. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79:464-490.

[23]ZhouC, DingLY, SkibniewskiMJ, et al., 2018. Data based complex network modeling and analysis of shield tunneling performance in metro construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38:168-186.

[24]ZhouL, ZhuHH, ShenY, et al., 2022. Full-scale experimental investigation on progressive failure characteristics of shield segmental lining connected through segmental joints containing ductile-iron joint panels. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 22(3):120.

[25]ZhouL, ShenY, GuanLX, et al., 2023. Full-scale experiment for segmental linings of deep-buried shield tunnels bearing high inner water pressure: comparison of mechanical behaviors of continuous- and stagger-jointed structures. Underground Space, 8:252-266.