Full Text:   <2257>

CLC number: R783.4; R783.6

On-line Access: 2013-06-04

Received: 2012-09-26

Revision Accepted: 2013-03-05

Crosschecked: 2013-05-17

Cited: 0

Clicked: 3848

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 2013 Vol.14 No.6 P.526-532


Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading

Author(s):  Zhen-zhen Peng, Xin-min Chen, Jun Wang, Ai-jie Li, Zu-jie Xu

Affiliation(s):  State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Corresponding email(s):   chenxinmin218@163.com

Key Words:  Cantilever fixed partial denture, Digital laser speckle technique, Contact strength, Three-dimensional displacement

Zhen-zhen Peng, Xin-min Chen, Jun Wang, Ai-jie Li, Zu-jie Xu. Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2013, 14(6): 526-532.

@article{title="Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading",
author="Zhen-zhen Peng, Xin-min Chen, Jun Wang, Ai-jie Li, Zu-jie Xu",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading
%A Zhen-zhen Peng
%A Xin-min Chen
%A Jun Wang
%A Ai-jie Li
%A Zu-jie Xu
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 14
%N 6
%P 526-532
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2013
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1200264

T1 - Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading
A1 - Zhen-zhen Peng
A1 - Xin-min Chen
A1 - Jun Wang
A1 - Ai-jie Li
A1 - Zu-jie Xu
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 14
IS - 6
SP - 526
EP - 532
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2013
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1200264

Objective: This study investigated the effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of cantilever fixed partial denture (CFPD) under vertically concentrated loading with digital laser speckle (DLS) technique. Methods: Fresh mandible of beagle dog was used to establish the implant-supported CFPD for specimen. DLS technique was employed for measuring the three-dimensional displacement of the prosthesis under vertically concentrated loading ranging from 200 to 3000 g. The effect of the contact tightness on the displacement of CFPD was investigated by means of changing the contact tightness. Results: When an axial concentrated loading was exerted on the pontic of the implant-supported CFPD, the displacement of the CFPD was the greatest. The displacement of the prosthesis decreased with the increase of contact strength. When the contact strength was 0, 0.95, and 3.25 N, the displacement of the buccolingual direction was smaller than that of the mesiodistal direction but greater than that of the occlusogingival direction. When the force on the contact area was 6.50 N, the mesiodistal displacement of the prosthesis was the biggest while the buccolingual displacement was the smallest. Conclusions: The implant-supported CFPD is an effective therapy for fully or partially edentulous patients. The restoration of the contact area and the selection of the appropriate contact strength can reduce the displacement of the CFPD, and get a better stress distribution. The most appropriate force value is 3.25 N in this study.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., Brånemark, P.I., 1981. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral Surg., 10(6):387-416.

[2]Adell, R., Eriksson, B., Lekholm, U., Brånemark, P.I., Jemt, T., 1990. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 5(4):347-359.

[3]Aglietta, M., Siciliano, V.I., Zwahlen, M., Brägger, U., Pjetursson, B.E., Lang, N.P., Salvi, G.E., 2009. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 20(5):441-451.

[4]Andersen, A.C., Good, L.S., 1970. The beagle as an experimental dog. Science, 170(3959):723.

[5]Arısan, V., Anıl, A., Wolke, J.G., Özer, K., 2010. The effect of injectable calcium phosphate cement on bone anchorage of titanium implants: an experimental feasibility study in dogs. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 39(5):463-468.

[6]Batista, L.R., Muramatsu, M., Campos, T.N., 2003. Stress analysis of fresh, fixed and macerated dog mandibles— holographic interferometric double exposition method. Proc. SPIE, 4829:1012-1013.

[7]Becker, C.M., 2004. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Quintessence Int., 35(6):437-441.

[8]Becker, C.M., Kaiser, D.A., 2000. Implant-retained cantilever fixed prosthesis: where and when. J. Prosthet. Dent., 84(4):432-435.

[9]Branemark, P.I., Zarb, G.A., Albrektsson,, T., Rosen, H.M., 1986. Tissue-integrated prostheses. osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Plastic Reconstruc. Surg., 77(3):496-497.

[10]Campos, T.N., Adachi, L.K., Chorres, J.E., Campos, A.C., Muramatsu, M., Gioso, M.A., 2006. Holographic interferometry method for assessment of static load stress distribution in dog mandible. Brazilian Dent. J., 17(4):279-284.

[11]Çehreli, M.C., Iplikçioglu, H., 2002. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Implant Dent., 11(3):286-292.

[12]Chen, F., Brown, G.M., Song, M., 2000. Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods. Opt. Eng., 39(1):10-22.

[13]Chen, T.Y., Chang, G.L., Wu, S.H., 1995. Holographic evaluation of the marginal fits of complete crowns loaded at the central fossa. Opt. Eng., 34(5):1364-1368.

[14]Chorres, J.E., Uono, C., Gioso, M.A., Batista, L., Muramatsu, M., Campos, T.N., 2005. Qualitative analysis of stress distribution in tooth-implant and implant-supported prosthesis by means of holography interferometry method. RPG Rev. Pos. Grad., 12(4):412-416.

[15]Coelho, P.G., Granato, R., Marin, C., Bonfante, E.A., Janal, M.N., Suzuki, M., 2010a. Biomechanical and bone histomorphologic evaluation of four surfaces on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 109(5):e39-e45.

[16]Coelho, P.G., Marin, C., Granato, R., Bonfante, E.A., Lima, C.P., Suzuki, M., 2010b. Surface treatment at the cervical region and its effect on bone maintenance after immediate implantation: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 110(2):182-187.

[17]Dörfer, C.E., von Bethlenfalvy, E.R., Staehle, H.J., Pioch, T., 2000. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strengths. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 108(5):368-377.

[18]Eskitascioglu, G., Usumez, A., Sevimay, M., Soykan, E., Unsal, E., 2004. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J. Prosthet. Dent., 91(2):144-150.

[19]Esposito, M., Hirsch, J., Lekholm, U., Thomsen, P., 1998. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur. J. Oral. Sci., 106(1):527-551.

[20]Huang, C.C., Lan, T.H., Lee, H.E., Wang, C.H., 2011. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method. J. Periodontol., 82(3):489-496.

[21]Kohavi, D., 1993. Complications in the tissue integrated prostheses components: clinical and mechanical evaluation. J. Oral Rehabil., 20(4):413-422.

[22]Manda, M., Galanis, C., Georgiopoulos, V., Provatidis, C., Koidis, P., 2010. Effect of varying the vertical dimension of connectors of cantilever cross-arch fixed dental prostheses in patients with severely reduced osseous support: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent., 103(2):91-100.

[23]Parfitt, G.J., 1960. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J. Dent. Res., 39(3):608-618.

[24]Romeed, S., Fok, S., Wilson, N.H.F., 2004. Finite element analysis of fixed partial denture replacement. J. Oral Rehabil., 31(12):1208-1217.

[25]Salvi, G.E., Brägger, U., 2009. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 24(Suppl):69-85.

[26]Sevimay, M., Turhan, F., Kiliçarslan, M.A., Eskitascioglu, G., 2005. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J. Prosthet. Dent., 93(3):227-234.

[27]van Leeuwen, E.J., Maltha, J.C., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M., van′t Hof, M.A., 2003. The effect of retention on orthodontic relapse after the use of small continuous or discontinuous forces. An experimental study in beagle dogs. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 111(2):111-116.

[28]Wang, C.H., Lee, H.E., Wang, C.C., Chang, H.P., 1998. Methods to improve a periodontally involved terminal abutment of a cantilever fixed partial denture—a finite element stress analysis. J. Oral Rehabil., 25(4):253-257.

[29]Wang, Q., 2009. Stress distribution of rigid fixed bridge in abutments with mandibular 56 deletion—a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Clin. Rehabil. Tissue Eng. Res., 13(17):3361-3364 (in Chinese).

[30]Weinberg, L.A., 1993. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 8:19.

[31]Xu, Z.J., Chen, X.M., Li, A.J., Chen, Y., Peng, Z.Z., Wang, J., 2013. Measuring three-dimensional displacement of tooth-supported rigid fixed bridge under oblique concentrated loading using digital laser speckle photograph. J. Sichuan Univ. (Med. Sci. Ed.), 44(1):99-103 (in Chinese).

[32]Zhang, Y.Z., Zhou, Y.C., Liu, L., Lu, Y., Hirofumi, Y., 2007. Stabilization of an abutment under a rigidly fixed bridge by holographical-speckle interferometry. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B, 8(6):416-421.

[33]Zurdo, J., Romao, C., Wennström, J.L., 2009. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 20(s4):59-66.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2022 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE