
CLC number: U213.61
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2017-07-27
Cited: 0
Clicked: 8519
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Rong Chen, Jia-yin Chen, Ping Wang, Jing-mang Xu, Jie-ling Xiao. Numerical investigation on wheel-turnout rail dynamic interaction excited by wheel diameter difference in high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700134 @article{title="Numerical investigation on wheel-turnout rail dynamic interaction excited by wheel diameter difference in high-speed railway", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
Abstract: The paper presents interesting results of simulation tests concerning numerical investigation on wheel-turnout rail dynamic interaction excited by wheel diameter difference. The paper is obviously of interest for researchers working in this field.
高速铁路轮径差激励下车轮-道岔动力响应数值研究创新点:通过数值仿真,分析轮径差对道岔区轮轨接触性能和轮轨动态相互作用的影响。 方 法:1. 基于迹线法,揭示轮径差对道岔区轮轨接触几何的影响。2. 通过建立轮轨接触有限元计算模型,探讨轮径差对轮轨法向接触性能的影响。3. 通过建立车辆-道岔耦合动力学模型,综合考虑在不同幅值和分布形式的轮径差激励下,车辆通过道岔的轮轨动态相互作用、运行舒适性和磨耗指数评价指标,提出轮径差限值。 结 论:1. 轮径差加剧了道岔区固有结构不平顺。2. 轮径差通过改变轮载过渡位置,对尖轨上的轮轨法向接触性能有较大影响。3. 可根据轮径差幅值将轮径差对道岔区轮轨动力响应的影响划分为三个区域:轮径差小于1.5 mm时,轮缘与尖轨提前接触使轮轨横向力快速增大;轮径差在1.5~2.5 mm时,等值同相轮径差使车辆通过道岔失稳;轮径差大于2.5 mm时,轮缘与尖轨的持续接触增强了车辆稳定性,但增加了轮轨磨耗。4. 建议将轮径差控制在2.5 mm以内,且应控制同相分布轮径差小于2 mm。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]Bruni, S., Anastasopoulos, I., Alfi, S., et al., 2009. Effects of train impacts on urban turnouts: modelling and validation through measurements. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 324(3-5):666-689. ![]() [2]Han, J., Zhao, G.T., Xiao, X.B., et al., 2015. Effect of softening of cement asphalt mortar on vehicle operation safety and track dynamics. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 16(12):976-986. ![]() [3]Johansson, A., Pålsson, B., Ekh, M., et al., 2011. Simulation of wheel–rail contact and damage in switches & crossings. Wear, 271(1-2):472-481. ![]() [4]Kassa, E., Nielsen, J.C.O., 2009. Dynamic train–turnout interaction in an extended frequency range using a detailed model of track dynamics. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 320(4-5):893-914. ![]() [5]Kassa, E., Andersson, C., Nielsen, J.C.O., 2006. Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout. Vehicle System Dynamics, 44(3):247-258. ![]() [6]Kuminek, T., Aniołek, K., Młyńczak, J., 2015. A numerical analysis of the contact stress distribution and physical modelling of abrasive wear in the tram wheel-frog system. Wear, 328-329:177-185. ![]() [7]Lagos, R.F., Alonso, A., Vinolas, J., et al., 2012. Rail vehicle passing through a turnout: analysis of different turnout designs and wheel profiles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail & Rapid Transit, 226(6):587-602. ![]() [8]Ling, L., Xiao, X.B., Xiong, J.Y., et al., 2014. A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 15(12):964-983. ![]() [9]Liu, X.F., He, Q.F., Liu, Y.J., 2008. Controlling rolling radii difference to eliminate flange bias-wear. The First International Symposium on Innovation & Sustainability of Modern Railway, p.528-533. ![]() [10]MOR (Ministry of Railways of the People’s Republic of China), 2008. Vehicle Test Specification for High Speed Electric Multiple Units, Railway Transportation No. [2008] 28. MOR, China (in Chinese). ![]() [11]NBS (National Bureau of Standards), 1985. Railway Vehicles-Specification for Evaluation the Dynamic Performance and Accreditation Test, GB 5599-85. National Standards of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). ![]() [12]Ren, Z., 2013. Multi-point contact of the high-speed vehicle-turnout system dynamics. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 26(3):518-525. ![]() [13]Ren, Z., Sun, S., Zhai, W., 2005. Study on lateral dynamic characteristics of vehicle/turnout system. Vehicle System Dynamics, 43(4):285-303. ![]() [14]Ren, Z., Iwnicki, S.D., Xie, G., 2011. A new method for determining wheel–rail multi-point contact. Vehicle System Dynamics, 49(10):1533-1551. ![]() [15]Sawley, K., Urban, C., Walker, R., 2005. The effect of hollow-worn wheels on vehicle stability in straight track. Wear, 258(7-8):1100-1108. ![]() [16]Wang, K.W., 1984. The track of wheel contact points and the calculation of wheel/rail geometric contact parameters. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1:89-99 (in Chinese). ![]() [17]Wang, L., Wang, P., Quan, S.X., et al., 2012. The effect of track alignment irregularity on wheel-rail contact geometry relationship in a turnout zone. Journal of Modern Transportation, 20(3):148-152. ![]() [18]Wang, P., Xu, J.M., Xie, K.Z., et al., 2016. Numerical simulation of rail profiles evolution in the switch panel of a railway turnout. Wear, 366-367:105-115. ![]() [19]Xu, J.M., Wang, P., Wang, L., et al., 2016. Effects of profile wear on wheel-rail contact conditions and dynamic interaction of vehicle and turnout. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8(1):1-14. ![]() [20]Zhang, B., Luo, Y.Y., 2015. Dynamic response of the track irregularity state in a subway turnout zone. Fifth International Conference on Transportation Engineering, p.1511-1517. ![]() Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||


ORCID:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>