Abstract: This paper aims at probing the flow characteristics of a jet in supersonic crossflow (JISC) by installing a vortex generator (VG) upstream of the jet orifice. Nanoparticle planar laser scattering (NPLS) and stereo-particle image velocimetry (SPIV) technologies were employed to observe the flowfield, and three cases were designed for comparison. CASE0 stands for JISC without passive VG. In CASE1 and CASE2, VG is installed at 20 mm and 80 mm upstream away from the jet orifice, respectively. Transient flow structures show that two flow modes exist when the VG wake interacts with the JISC. In CASE1, vortices are induced from both sides of the jet plume because of the VG wake. This leads to a complex streamwise vortex system. Penetration and lateral diffusion are enhanced. In CASE2, intermittent large-scale eddies in the VG wake cause large streamwise vortices at the windward side of the jet. The penetration depth is also enhanced while the lateral diffusion is restrained. In addition, experimental results show that the penetration depth is approximately 8.5% higher in CASE1 than that in CASE0, and the lateral diffusion is larger by about 17.0%. In CASE2, the penetration is increased by about 26.2%, while the lateral diffusion is enhanced by just 0.5%.

喷孔上游涡流发生器诱导下的横向射流流动特性研究

[1]Anderson B, Tinapple J, Surber L, 2006. Optimal control of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions using micro-array actuation. Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference.

[2]Babinsky H, Li Y, Ford CWP, 2009. Microramp control of supersonic oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. AIAA Journal, 47(3):668-675.

[3]Bogdanoff DW, 1994. Advanced injection and mixing techniques for scramjet combustors. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 10(2):183-190.

[4]Chen F, Liu H, Rong Z, 2012. Development and application of nanoparticle tracers for PIV in supersonic and hypersonic flows. Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition.

[5]Chen F, Liu H, Yang ZF, et al., 2017. Tracking characteristics of tracer particles for PIV measurements in supersonic flows. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 30(2):577-585.

[6]Edalatpour A, Hassanvand A, Gerdroodbary MB, et al., 2019. Injection of multi hydrogen jets within cavity flameholder at supersonic flow. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(26):13923-13931.

[7]Fallah K, Gerdroodbary MB, Ghaderi A, et al., 2018. The influence of micro air jets on mixing augmentation of fuel in cavity flameholder at supersonic flow. Aerospace Science and Technology, 76:187-193.

[8]Gerdroodbary MB, Mokhtari M, Fallah K, et al., 2016. The influence of micro air jets on mixing augmentation of transverse hydrogen jet in supersonic flow. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(47):22497-22508.

[9]Gerdroodbary MB, Amini Y, Ganji DD, et al., 2017a. The flow feature of transverse hydrogen jet in presence of micro air jets in supersonic flow. Advances in Space Research, 59(5):1330-1340.

[10]Gerdroodbary MB, Fallah K, Pourmirzaagha H, 2017b. Characteristics of transverse hydrogen jet in presence of multi air jets within scramjet combustor. Acta Astronautica, 132:25-32.

[11]Hassanvand A, Gerdroodbary MB, Fallah K, et al., 2018. Effect of dual micro fuel jets on mixing performance of hydrogen in cavity flameholder at supersonic flow. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(20):9829-9837.

[12]Huang HB, Lu F, 2011. Research progress of vortex generator application. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 35(3):611-614 (in Chinese).

[13]Huang W, 2016. Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows. Aerospace Science and Technology, 50:183-195.

[14]Huang W, 2018. Mixing enhancement strategies and their mechanisms in supersonic flows: a brief review. Acta Astronautica, 145:492-500.

[15]Huang W, Liu WD, Li SB, et al., 2012. Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows. Acta Astronautica, 73:1-9.

[16]Huang W, Yang J, Yan L, 2014. Multi-objective design optimization of the transverse gaseous jet in supersonic flows. Acta Astronautica, 93:13-22.

[17]Karagozian AR, 2010. Transverse jets and their control. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(5):531-553.

[18]Lee S, Loth E, Babinsky H, 2011. Normal shock boundary layer control with various vortex generator geometries. Computers & Fluids, 49(1):233-246.

[19]Lee SH, 2012. Mixing augmentation with cooled pylon injection in a scramjet combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 28(3):477-485.

[20]Lin JC, 2002. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(4-5):389-420.

[21]Liu H, Chen F, Li XJ, et al., 2016. Practices and challenges on PIV technology in high speed complex flows. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 30(1):28-42 (in Chinese).

[22]Mahesh K, 2013. The interaction of jets with crossflow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45(1):379-407.

[23]Moradi R, Mahyari A, Gerdroodbary MB, et al., 2018. Shape effect of cavity flameholder on mixing zone of hydrogen jet at supersonic flow. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(33):16364-16372.

[24]Papamoschou D, Roshko A, 1988. The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 197:453-477.

[25]Saravanan G, Suresh C, 2012. Numerical simulation of mixing enhancement in scramjet using micro vortex generator. Procedia Engineering, 38:3969-3976.

[26]Sujith S, Muruganandam TM, Kurian J, 2013. Effect of trailing ramp angles in strut-based injection in supersonic flow. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 29(1):66-78.

[27]Szumowski A, Wojciechowski J, 2005. Use of vortex generators to control internal supersonic flow separation. AIAA Journal, 43(1):216-218.

[28]Tedeschi G, Gouin H, Elena M, 1999. Motion of tracer particles in supersonic flows. Experiments in Fluids, 26(4):288-296.

[29]Tian LF, Yi SH, Zhao YX, et al., 2009. Study of density field measurement based on NPLS technique in supersonic flow. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 52(9):1357-1363.

[30]Wang B, Liu WD, Zhao YX, et al., 2012. Experimental investigation of the micro-ramp based shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction control. Physics of Fluids, 24(5):055110.

[31]Yan YH, Li Q, Liu CQ, et al., 2012. Numerical discovery and experimental confirmation of vortex ring generation by microramp vortex generator. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(11):5700-5708.

[32]Yi SH, Tian LF, Zhao YX, et al., 2010. Aero-optical aberration measuring method based on NPLS and its application. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(31):3545-3549.

[33]Zaman KBMQ, Rigby DL, Heidmann JD, 2010. Inclined jet in crossflow interacting with a vortex generator. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 26(5):947-954.

[34]Zhang YJ, Liu WD, Wang B, et al., 2016. Effects of micro-ramp on transverse jet in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica, 127:160-170.

[35]Zhao YH, Liang JH, Yan TT, 2016. Penetration characteristics and optimization of transverse jet on condition of vortex generator. Journal of Aerospace Power, 31(4):800-806 (in Chinese).

[36]Zhao YX, Yi SH, Tian LF, et al., 2009. Supersonic flow imaging via nanoparticles. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(12):3640-3648.

[37]Zhong YC, Chen X, 1996. Effects of geometric parameters of submerged delta vortex generator on vortex. Journal of Aerospace Power, 11(3):241-244 (in Chinese).