CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2023-07-20
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1983
Lihui XU, Meng MA. Analytical solution of ground-borne vibration due to a spatially periodic harmonic moving load in a tunnel embedded in layered soil[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200385 @article{title="Analytical solution of ground-borne vibration due to a spatially periodic harmonic moving load in a tunnel embedded in layered soil", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
隧道结构作用移动周期简谐荷载时的地表振动响应解析解机构:1北京交通大学,城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,中国北京,100044;2北京交通大学,土木建筑工程学院,中国北京,100044 目的:地铁列车运行时诱发的振动会对周围环境造成不利影响。本文旨在提出适用于振动预测的周期性隧道-地层耦合解析模型,探讨各种参数(地层参数、隧道参数、荷载参数等)对振动响应的影响,研究振动的传播规律,为减振设计提供理论依据。 创新点:1.根据平面波与柱面波之间的转换关系,推导适用于环境振动预测的周期性隧道-地层耦合解析模型;2.通过参数分析,明确移动周期简谐荷载下振动响应的规律及各种参数的影响。 方法:1.通过理论推导和考虑隧道结构与层状土间的动力相互作用,获得移动周期简谐荷载下动力响应的计算方法(公式(19));2.通过对比验证,以及根据现有移动常力及移动简谐荷载的动力响应结果,验证所提模型的准确性及高效性(图4~6);3.通过参数分析,设置工程常见的参数(地层参数、隧道参数和荷载参数等),得到移动周期简谐荷载下的振动响应规律及各种参数的影响(图7~16)。 结论:1.所提周期性隧道-地层耦合解析模型的计算效率高,预测结果准确,可用于地铁列车振动环境影响预测。2.由于荷载移动效应及多普勒效应,荷载参数影响振动响应主频及频率分布带宽,但地层参数及隧道参数的影响较小。3.增加隧道埋深是降低地表振动水平的有效措施。4.地表一定距离处的振动水平高于隧道正上方,即出现振动放大区;环评时应当重点关注放大区内的振动水平,避免不利影响。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]BoströmA, KristenssonG, StrömS, 1991. Transformation properties of plane, spherical and cylindrical scalar and vector wave functions. In: Varadan VV, Lakhtakia A, Varadan VK (Eds.), Acoustic, Electromagnetic and Elastic Wave Scattering, Field Representations and Introduction to Scattering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, p.165-210. ![]() [2]ClouteauD, ArnstM, Al-HussainiTM, et al., 2005. Freefield vibrations due to dynamic loading on a tunnel embedded in a stratified medium. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 283(1-2):173-199. ![]() [3]DegrandeG, ClouteauD, OthmanR, et al., 2006. A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic finite element ![]() [4]DoyleJF, 1997. Wave Propagation in Structures: Spectral Analysis Using Fast Discrete Fourier Transforms, 2nd Edition. Springer, New York, USA. ![]() [5]ForrestJA, HuntHEM, 2006a. A three-dimensional tunnel model for calculation of train-induced ground vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 294(4-5):678-705. ![]() [6]ForrestJA, HuntHEM, 2006b. Ground vibration generated by trains in underground tunnels. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 294(4-5):706-736. ![]() [7]FrançoisS, SchevenelsM, GalvínP, et al., 2010. A 2.5D coupled FE–BE methodology for the dynamic interaction between longitudinally invariant structures and a layered halfspace. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199(23-24):1536-1548. ![]() [8]GaoGY, HeJF, YangCB, et al., 2011. Ground vibration induced by trains moving on saturated ground using 2.5D FEM. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 33(2):234-241 (in Chinese). ![]() [9]HeC, ZhouSH, DiHG, et al., 2018. Analytical method for calculation of ground vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. Computers and Geotechnics, 99:149-164. ![]() [10]HeC, ZhouSH, GuoPJ, et al., 2019. Theoretical modelling of the dynamic interaction between twin tunnels in a multi-layered half-space. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 456:65-85. ![]() [11]HusseinMFM, HuntHEM, 2009. A numerical model for calculating vibration due to a harmonic moving load on a floating-slab track with discontinuous slabs in an underground railway tunnel. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 321(1-2):363-374. ![]() [12]HusseinMFM, FrançoisS, SchevenelsM, et al., 2014. The fictitious force method for efficient calculation of vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333(25):6996-7018. ![]() [13]JinH, TianQR, LiZ, et al., 2022. Ability of vibration control using rubberized concrete for tunnel invert-filling. Construction and Building Materials, 317:125932. ![]() [14]KouroussisG, ConnollyDP, VerlindenO, 2014. Railway-induced ground vibrations–a review of vehicle effects. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2(2):69-110. ![]() [15]LinKC, HungHH, YangJP, et al., 2016. Seismic analysis of underground tunnels by the 2.5D finite/infinite element approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 85:31-43. ![]() [16]LiuWF, WuZZ, LiCY, et al., 2022. Prediction of ground-borne vibration induced by a moving underground train based on excitation experiments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 523:116728. ![]() [17]LombaertG, DegrandeG, FrançoisS, et al., 2015. Ground-borne vibration due to railway traffic: a review of excitation mechanisms, prediction methods and mitigation measures. In: Nielsen JCO, Anderson D, Gautier PE, et al. (Eds.), Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, p.253-287. ![]() [18]LopesP, RuizJF, Alves CostaP, et al., 2016. Vibrations inside buildings due to subway railway traffic. Experimental validation of a comprehensive prediction model. Science of the Total Environment, 568:1333-1343. ![]() [19]MaLX, LiuWN, 2018. A numerical train–floating slab track coupling model based on the periodic-Fourier-modal method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(1):315-334. ![]() [20]MaLX, LiuWN, JiangYJ, et al., 2017. Metro train-induced vibration influences on surrounding environments based on sliced finite element-infinite element coupled model. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(15):111-117 (in Chinese). ![]() [21]MaLX, ZhangC, OuyangHJ, et al., 2021. 2.5D modelling of wave propagation in longitudinally curved viscoelastic structure using a coupled FEM-PML approach. Engineering Structures, 226:111337. ![]() [22]MaM, LiuWN, QianCY, et al., 2016. Study of the train-induced vibration impact on a historic bell tower above two spatially overlapping metro lines. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 81:58-74. ![]() [23]MaM, LiuWN, LiuWF, 2020. Research progresses of prediction method and uncertainty of train-induced environmental vibration. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 20(3):1-16 (in Chinese). ![]() [24]MaM, LiMH, QuXY, et al., 2022. Effect of passing metro trains on uncertainty of vibration source intensity: monitoring tests. Measurement, 193:110992. ![]() [25]MetrikineAV, VrouwenvelderACWM, 2000. Surface ground vibration due to a moving train in a tunnel: two-dimensional model. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 234(1):43-66. ![]() [26]PilantWL, 1979. Elastic Waves in the Earth. Elsevier, New York, USA. ![]() [27]ShengX, JonesCJC, ThompsonDJ, 2002. Moving Green’s Functions for a Layered Circular Cylinder of Infinite Length. ISVR Technical Memorandum No. 885, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. ![]() [28]ShengX, JonesCJC, ThompsonDJ, 2005. Modelling ground vibration from railways using wavenumber finite- and boundary-element methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 461(2059):2043-2070. ![]() [29]XuLH, MaM, 2020. Study of the characteristics of train-induced dynamic SIFs of tunnel lining cracks based on the modal superposition approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 233:107069. ![]() [30]XuLH, MaM, 2022. Dynamic response of the multilayered half-space medium due to the spatially periodic harmonic moving load. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 157:107246. ![]() [31]XuLH, MaM, CaoRN, et al., 2022. Effect of longitudinally varying characteristics of soil on metro train-induced ground vibrations based on wave propagation analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 152:107020. ![]() [32]YangYB, LiJ, 2022. 2.5D prediction of soil vibrations due to railway loads by the isogeometric analysis with scaled boundary. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 134:341-359. ![]() [33]YangYB, LiangXJ, HungHH, et al., 2017. Comparative study of 2D and 2.5D responses of long underground tunnels to moving train loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 97:86-100. ![]() [34]YangYB, LiuSJ, ChenW, et al., 2021. Half-space response to trains moving along curved paths by 2.5D finite/infinite element approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 145:106740. ![]() [35]YuanZH, BoströmA, CaiYQ, 2017. Benchmark solution for vibrations from a moving point source in a tunnel embedded in a half-space. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 387:177-193. ![]() [36]YuanZH, CaoZG, TangH, et al., 2021. Analytical layer element with a circular cavity and its application in predicting ground vibrations from surface and underground moving sources. Computers and Geotechnics, 137:104262. ![]() [37]ZhangZH, ZhangXD, TangY, et al., 2018. Discrete element analysis of a cross-river tunnel under random vibration levels induced by trains operating during the flood season. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 19(5):346-366. ![]() [38]ZhouSH, HeC, GuoPJ, et al., 2019. Dynamic response of a segmented tunnel in saturated soil using a 2.5D FE-BE methodology. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 120:386-397. ![]() [39]ZouC, MooreJA, SanayeiM, et al., 2022. Impedance model of train-induced vibration transmission across a transfer structure into an over track building in a metro depot. Journal of Structural Engineering, 148(11):04022187. ![]() Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>