Abstract: When subjected to external loads from the ground and nearby construction, tunnel segmental lining joints are prone to damaging deformation. This can result in water leakage into tunnels, posing great safety risks. With this issue in mind, we conducted a series of full-scale tests to study the effects of external loads on the waterproofing performance of longitudinal joints. A customized rig for testing segmental joints was developed to assess the effect of loading magnitude, eccentricity, and loading-unloading-reloading cycles on waterproofing performance. Additionally, the relationship between joint force, sealing gasket deformation, and waterproofing pressure was investigated. The results indicate that: (1) the sealing gasket’s compression rapidly decreases as external loads increase, which weakens the waterproofing capacity of the joint; (2) the watertightness limit dramatically decreases as the bending moment increases; (3) a loading-unloading-reloading cycle leads to degradation of the joint’s waterproofing performance. The findings of this study provide a reference for subsequent waterproofing design of segmental tunnel joints, helping ensure the safety of tunnels throughout their operational lifespans.

盾构隧道纵向接缝在外部荷载作用下防水性能的足尺试验研究

[1]ChenRP, MengFY, LiZC, et al., 2016. Investigation of response of metro tunnels due to adjacent large excavation and protective measures in soft soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 58:224-235.

[2]DingWQ, GongCJ, MosalamKM, et al., 2017. Development and application of the integrated sealant test apparatus for sealing gaskets in tunnel segmental joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 63:54-68.

[3]GongCJ, DingWQ, MosalamKM, et al., 2017. Comparison of the structural behavior of reinforced concrete and steel fiber reinforced concrete tunnel segmental joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 68:38-57.

[4]GongCJ, DingWQ, SogaK, et al., 2018. Sealant behavior of gasketed segmental joints in shield tunnels: an experimental and numerical study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 77:127-141.

[5]GongCJ, DingWQ, SogaK, et al., 2019. Failure mechanism of joint waterproofing in precast segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 84:334-352.

[6]GongCJ, WangYY, DingWQ, et al., 2022. Waterproof performance of sealing gasket in shield tunnel: a review. Applied Sciences, 12(9):4556.

[7]HuangHW, ShaoH, ZhangDM, et al., 2017. Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: a case study. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(3):345-360.

[8]HuangHW, LiQT, ZhangDM, 2018. Deep learning based image recognition for crack and leakage defects of metro shield tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 77:166-176.

[9]HuangZK, PitilakisK, ArgyroudisS, et al., 2021. Selection of optimal intensity measures for fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 145:106724.

[10]HuangZK, ChengYX, ZhangDM, et al., 2024. Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of shallowly buried large-section underground civil defense structure in soft soils: framework and application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 146:105640.

[11]KasperT, MeschkeG, 2006. A numerical study of the effect of soil and grout material properties and cover depth in shield tunnelling. Computers and Geotechnics, 33(4-5):234-247.

[12]KoyomaY, NishimuraT, 1998. The design of lining segment of shield tunnel using a beam-spring model. Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute), 39(1):23-27.

[13]LeeKM, GeXW, 2001. The equivalence of a jointed shield-driven tunnel lining to a continuous ring structure. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38(3):461-483.

[14]LiRJ, GongCJ, DingWQ, 2023. Aging performance under assembly pressure of joint gasket in shield tunnel. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 20(5):1786-1799(in Chinese).

[15]LiSH, ZhangMJ, LiPF, 2021. Analytical solutions to ground settlement induced by ground loss and construction loadings during curved shield tunneling. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 22(4):296-313.

[16]LinXT, ChenXS, SuD, et al., 2022. An analytical model to evaluate the resilience of shield tunnel linings considering multistage disturbances and recoveries. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 127:104581.

[17]LiuX, BaiY, YuanY, et al., 2016. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(10):1364-1379.

[18]MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China), 2010. Code for Design of Concrete Structures. GB/T 50010-2010, National Standards of the People’s Republic of China(in Chinese).

[19]PetraroiaDN, PlückelmannS, MarkP, et al., 2024. Tunnel lining segments with enhanced bearing capacity using hybrid concrete concepts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 143:105484.

[20]RobinPYF, 1973. Note on effective pressure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78(14):2434-2437.

[21]ShalabiFI, CordingEJ, PaulSL, 2012. Concrete segment tunnel lining sealant performance under earthquake loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 31:51-60.

[22]ShalabiFI, CordingEJ, PaulSL, 2016. Sealant behavior of gasketed segmental tunnel lining‍–‍Conceptual model. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 9(4):345-355.

[23]ShenSL, WuHN, CuiYJ, et al., 2014. Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 40:309-323.

[24]WalshJB, 1981. Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 18(5):429-435.

[25]WangFY, HuangHW, 2020. Theoretical analysis of the joint leakage in shield tunnel considering the typical deformation mode. International Journal of Geomechanics, 20(12):04020218.

[26]WangZN, ShenSL, ZhouAN, et al., 2021. Investigation of time-dependent characteristics of EPDM rubber gasket used for shield tunnels. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33(9).

[27]WuHN, ShenSL, ChenRP, et al., 2020. Three-dimensional numerical modelling on localised leakage in segmental lining of shield tunnels. Computers and Geotechnics, 122:103549.

[28]WuHN, LiuL, LiuY, et al., 2023. Weakening behavior of waterproof performance in joints of shield tunnels under adjacent constructions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(6):884-900.

[29]XuBT, QiuJF, SunQ, et al., 2016. Study of the damage mechanics and dewatering recovery programs for the shield tunnel under the Yangtze river. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 22(4):352-366.

[30]YangC, ShenSL, HouDW, et al., 2018. Material properties of the seal gasket for shield tunnels: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 191:877-890.

[31]ZhangDM, MaLX, ZhangJ, et al., 2015. Ground and tunnel responses induced by partial leakage in saturated clay with anisotropic permeability. Engineering Geology, 189:104-115.

[32]ZhangDM, GaoCP, YinZY, 2019. CFD-DEM modeling of seepage erosion around shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 83:60-72.

[33]ZhangDM, BuXH, PangJ, et al., 2022a. Soil effect on the bearing capacity of a double-lining structure under internal water pressure. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23(11):863-881.

[34]ZhangDM, LiuJ, HuangZK, et al., 2022b. Waterproof performance of tunnel segmental joints under different deformation conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 123:104437.

[35]ZhangGL, ZhangWJ, LiHL, et al., 2021a. Waterproofing behavior of sealing gaskets for circumferential joints in shield tunnels: a full-scale experimental investigation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 108:103682.

[36]ZhangGL, ZhangWJ, CaoWZ, et al., 2021b. A novel test setup for determining waterproof performance of rubber gaskets used in tunnel segmental joints: development and application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 115:104079.

[37]ZhangZX, SunJ, ZhuYF, et al., 2018. Experimental study on waterproof performance of joint seal for deeply-buried storage and drainage tunnel. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 52(3):431-439(in Chinese).

[38]ZhaoHL, LiuX, BaoYH, et al., 2017. Nonlinear simulation of tunnel linings with a simplified numerical modelling. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 61(5):593-603.

[39]ZhengG, CuiT, ChengXS, et al., 2017. Study of the collapse mechanism of shield tunnels due to the failure of segments in sandy ground. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79:464-490.

[40]ZhouWF, LiaoSM, MenYQ, 2021. A fluid-solid coupled modeling on water seepage through gasketed joint of segmented tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 114:104008.