Abstract: A wide-speed aircraft capable of horizontal takeoff possesses advantages of rapid response speed, high maneuverability, improved safety, and suitability for different terrains and applications. In this study, a morphing vehicle design with horizontal takeoff and landing capabilities is presented. The aircraft achieves strong aerodynamic performance at subsonic to hypersonic speeds through a wave-like fuselage and a continuously variable sweep angle between 30° and 60°. First, the configuration of the vehicle and its morphing mechanism are described. Then, through numerical modeling, the aerodynamic performance of the vehicle is investigated over a flight profile progressing from horizontal takeoff to hypersonic cruising. These results indicate that different vehicle configurations might be used for different speed ranges so as to optimize performance. The numerical and flow field data also suggest that the effect of the variable sweep angle on the aerodynamic characteristics is weaker in the hypersonic speed range compared to the subsonic range. Overall, the proposed morphing aircraft has excellent aerodynamic characteristics in the speed range of Mach 0.3 to Mach 7. Moreover, its lift coefficients and lift-to-drag ratios in the subsonic phase ensure that horizontal takeoff and landing can be achieved, and its variable sweep angle effectively extends the flight envelope.

水平起降宽速域变体设计与气动特性分析

[1]AbdulrahimM, LindR, 2005. Control and simulation of a multi-role morphing micro air vehicle. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit.

[2]AjajRM, JankeeGK, 2018. The transformer aircraft: a multimission unmanned aerial vehicle capable of symmetric and asymmetric span morphing. Aerospace Science and Technology, 76:512-522.

[3]AndersenG, CowanD, PiatakD, 2007. Aeroelastic modeling, analysis and testing of a morphing wing structure. The 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.

[4]BalepinV, ListonG, 2001. The SteamJet^TM: Mach 6+ turbine engine with inlet air conditioning. The 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.

[5]BattagliaM, SellittoA, GiamundoA, et al., 2024. Advanced material thermomechanical modelling of shape memory alloys applied to automotive design. Shape Memory and Superelasticity, 10(3):297-313.

[6]ByeD, McClureP, 2007. Design of a morphing vehicle. The 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.

[7]ChenSH, LiuJ, HuangW, et al., 2020. Design methodology of an osculating cone waverider with adjustable sweep and dihedral angles. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 21(9):770-782.

[8]ClarkC, KloeselK, RatnayakeN, 2011. A technology pathway for airbreathing, combined-cycle, horizontal space launch through SR-71 based trajectory modeling. 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference.

[9]DaiP, YanBB, HuangW, et al., 2020. Design and aerodynamic performance analysis of a variable-sweep-wing morphing waverider. Aerospace Science and Technology, 98:105703.

[10]DingF, 2016. Research of a Novel Airframe/Inlet Integrated Full-Waverider Aerodynamic Design Methodology for Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicles. PhD Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China(in Chinese).

[11]FengC, ChenSS, YuanW, et al., 2023. A wide-speed-range aerodynamic configuration by adopting wave-riding-strake wing. Acta Astronautica, 202:442-452.

[12]FlanaganJ, StrutzenbergR, MyersR, et al., 2007. Development and flight testing of a morphing aircraft, the NextGen MFX-1. The 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.

[13]HuXZ, ChenXQ, ParksGT, et al., 2016. Review of improved Monte Carlo methods in uncertainty-based design optimization for aerospace vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 86:20-27.

[14]IvancoT, ScottR, LoveM, et al., 2007. Validation of the Lockheed Martin morphing concept with wind tunnel testing. The 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.

[15]JinZK, YuZH, MengFS, et al., 2024. Parametric design method and lift/drag characteristics analysis for a wide-range, wing-morphing glide vehicle. Aerospace, 11(4):257.

[16]JitsukawaT, AdachiH, AbeT, et al., 2017. Bio-inspired wing-folding mechanism of micro air vehicle (MAV). Artificial Life and Robotics, 22(2):203-208.

[17]KhanZA, AgrawalSK, 2011. Study of biologically inspired flapping mechanism for micro air vehicles. AIAA Journal, 49(7):1354-1365.

[18]LiDC, ZhaoSW, da RonchA, et al., 2018. A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 100:46-62.

[19]LiSB, LuoSB, HuangW, et al., 2013. Influence of the connection section on the aerodynamic performance of the tandem waverider in a wide-speed range. Aerospace Science and Technology, 30(1):50-65.

[20]LiSB, HuangW, WangZG, et al., 2014. Design and aerodynamic investigation of a parallel vehicle on a wide-speed range. Science China Information Sciences, 57(12):1-10.

[21]LiSB, WangZG, HuangW, et al., 2018. Design and investigation on variable Mach number waverider for a wide-speed range. Aerospace Science and Technology, 76:291-302.

[22]LiX, WangXG, ZhouHY, et al., 2024. A novel evasion guidance for hypersonic morphing vehicle via intelligent maneuver strategy. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(5):441-461.

[23]LiYF, XiangYY, ShiLJ, et al., 2024. Efficient reliability analysis via a nonlinear autoregressive multi-fidelity surrogate model and active learning. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 25(11):922-937.

[24]LiuB, LiangH, HanZH, et al., 2022. Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a morphing wing considering a wide Mach-number range. Aerospace Science and Technology, 124:107557.

[25]LiuSX, YanBB, HuangW, et al., 2023. Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(5):387-403.

[26]LoveM, ZinkP, StroudR, et al., 2007. Demonstration of morphing technology through ground and wind tunnel tests. The 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.

[27]LuoSB, YueH, LiuJ, 2023. Optimization design of aerodynamic layout for hypersonic morphing aircraft. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering, (2):51-55 (in Chinese).

[28]LuoSB, YueH, LiuJ, et al., 2024. Study on aerodynamic performance of morphing hypersonic vehicle in wide-speed range. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 41(2):184-201.

[29]MackenzieD, 2012. A flapping of wings. Science, 335(6075):1430-1433.

[30]MiaoXJ, GaoGJ, WangJB, et al., 2023. Effect of low operating temperature on the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(3):284-298.

[31]PhoenixAA, RogersRE, MaxwellJR, et al., 2019. Mach five to ten morphing waverider: control point study. Journal of Aircraft, 56(2):493-504.

[32]QuF, WangQ, ChengSW, et al., 2025. Aerodynamic shape optimization design of airframe/propulsion integrated hypersonic aircraft with aerodynamics/trajectory/control coupling. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 46(4):130874 (in Chinese).

[33]RamezaniA, ChungSJ, HutchinsonS, 2017. A biomimetic robotic platform to study flight specializations of bats. Science Robotics, 2(3):aal2505.

[34]RiccioA, SellittoA, BattagliaM, 2024. Morphing spoiler for adaptive aerodynamics by shape memory alloys. Actuators, 13(9):330.

[35]SendW, FischerM, JebensK, et al., 2012. Artificial hinged-wing bird with active torsion and partially linear kinematics. The 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, p.1-10.

[36]TzongG, JacobsR, LiguoreS, 2010. Air Vehicle Integration and Technology Research (AVIATR) Task Order 0015: Predictive Capability for Hypersonic Structural Response and Life Prediction: Phase 1-Identification of Knowledge Gaps. The Boeing Company, USA.

[37]WangF, PeiXB, WuGX, et al., 2024. Analysis and design of bat-like flapping-wing aircraft. Aerospace, 11(4):325.

[38]XiePZ, YeK, XiePT, et al., 2024. Supersonic flutter mechanism of “diamond-back” folding wings. Aerospace Science and Technology, 153:109396.

[39]ZhangH, LiJ, YangZ, 2023. Double-decoupled inverse design of natural laminar flow nacelle under transonic conditions. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 36(6):1-18.

[40]ZhangH, WangP, TangGJ, et al., 2024a. Fixed-time attitude control for hypersonic morphing vehicles: a dynamic memory event-triggering approach. Aerospace Science and Technology, 155:109577.

[41]ZhangH, WangP, TangGJ, et al., 2024b. Fuzzy disturbance observer-based fixed-time attitude control for hypersonic morphing vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 60(5):6577-6593.

[42]ZhangTT, YanXT, HuangW, et al., 2021. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a wide speed range vehicle with waveride airframe and RBCC engine. Energy, 235:121386.

[43]ZhangWH, LiuJ, DingF, et al., 2019. Novel integration methodology for an inward turning waverider forebody/inlet. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 20(12):918-926.

[44]ZhaoZT, HuangW, YanBB, et al., 2018. Design and high speed aerodynamic performance analysis of vortex lift waverider with a wide-speed range. Acta Astronautica, 151:848-863.