
Jingmang XU, Hui ZHU, Wenfeng GAO, Taoshuo BAI, Jian YANG, Kai WANG, Yao QIAN, Ping WANG. Effect of laminar plasma quenching technology on the anti-wear and anti-fatigue properties of two types of U75V rail welded joints[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2500194 @article{title="Effect of laminar plasma quenching technology on the anti-wear and anti-fatigue properties of two types of U75V rail welded joints", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
层流等离子淬火技术对两种U75V钢轨焊接接头抗磨损和抗疲劳性能的影响机构:1西南交通大学,高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,中国成都,610031;2西南交通大学,土木工程学院,中国成都,610031;3新加坡国立大学,设计与工程学院,新加坡,117356 目的:探究层流等离子体淬火(LPQ)技术对U75V铝热焊接头与闪光对焊接头的强化效果,旨在提升其抗磨损与抗疲劳性能,进而延长其服役寿命。 创新点:本研究首次将LPQ技术应用于U75V钢轨铝热焊与闪光对焊接头,并通过双盘试验对比分析,阐明经过LPQ处理后不同焊接接头的摩擦学行为与损伤特性。 方法:1.对两种钢轨焊接接头的硬度与微观组织进行分析;2.对两种接头试样进行LPQ处理,并利用双盘试验机对比处理前后试样的抗磨损和抗疲劳性能;3.结合扫描电子显微镜、能谱分析及电子背散射衍射等技术,对淬火区的元素分布与晶体结构进行表征,进而阐明其磨损机制与损伤差异。 结论:1.LPQ处理显著提升了闪光焊接头的耐磨性,但铝热焊接头因内部存在缺陷反而加剧磨损;2.经过LPQ处理后,两种钢轨焊接接头的裂纹发展得到抑制,但其扩展机制表现出明显差异;3.淬火闪光焊接头过渡区的裂纹内存在氧化腐蚀,且元素分析表明Fe、O波动与氧化层剥落有关;4.大角度晶界分布与位错密度的差异共同解释了热影响区损伤比焊缝区严重、淬火铝热焊接头整体损伤比淬火闪光焊接头严重的规律。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]BaiTS, XuJM, ZhuH, et al., 2024. Investigation into the wear evolution and fatigue crack propagation behaviour of rails subjected to laminar plasma discrete quenching and tempering treatment. Wear, 554-555:205470. [2]DingHH, MuXP, ZhuY, et al., 2022. Effect of laser claddings of Fe-based alloy powder with different concentrations of WS2 on the mechanical and tribological properties of railway wheel. Wear, 488-489:204174. [3]FangXY, ZhangHN, MaDW, et al., 2022. Influence of welding residual stress on subsurface fatigue crack propagation of rail. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 271:108642. [4]GalloP, LehtoP, MalitckiiE, et al., 2022. Influence of microstructural deformation mechanisms and shear strain localisations on small fatigue crack growth in ferritic stainless steel. International Journal of Fatigue, 163:107024. [5]GhazanfariM, TehraniPH, 2021. Increasing fatigue crack initiation life in butt-welded UIC60 rail by optimization of welding process parameters. International Journal of Fatigue, 151:106367. [6]GuoD, YuDP, ZhangP, et al., 2020. Laminar plasma jet surface hardening of the U75V rail steel: insight into the hardening mechanism and control scheme. Surface and Coatings Technology, 394:125857. [7]GuoD, YuDP, ZhangP, et al., 2021. Laminar plasma jet surface hardening of P20 mold steel: analysis on the wear and corrosion behaviors. Surface and Coatings Technology, 415:127129. [8]HernándezFCR, OkonkwoAO, KadekarV, et al., 2016. Laser cladding: the alternative for field thermite welds life extension. Materials & Design, 111:165-173. [9]HuZH, ZhuHH, ZhangCC, et al., 2018. Contact angle evolution during selective laser melting. Materials & Design, 139:304-313. [10]HultgrenG, MansourR, BarsoumZ, 2023. Fatigue strength assessment of welded joints incorporating the variability in local weld geometry using a probabilistic framework. International Journal of Fatigue, 167:107364. [11]IlićN, JovanovićMT, TodorovićM, et al., 1999. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of postweld heat-treated thermite weld in rails. Materials Characterization, 43(4):243-250. [12]KenelC, DawsonK, BarrasJ, et al., 2017. Microstructure and oxide particle stability in a novel ODS γ-TiAl alloy processed by spark plasma sintering and laser additive manufacturing. Intermetallics, 90:63-73. [13]LeiJB, ShiC, ZhouSF, et al., 2018. Enhanced corrosion and wear resistance properties of carbon fiber reinforced Ni-based composite coating by laser cladding. Surface and Coatings Technology, 334:274-285. [14]LiSR, WangXM, DongWJ, et al., 2025. Peridynamic analysis of rolling contact fatigue crack propagation in rail welding joints with pore defects. International Journal of Fatigue, 190:108612. [15]LiW, ChangKR, ZengPY, et al., 2021. Impact wear of flash- and aluminothermic-welded hypereutectoid steel rail joints. Tribology Transactions, 64(4):644-657. [16]LiXY, MaR, LiuX, et al., 2022. Effect of laser shock peening on fatigue properties of U75VG rail flash-butt welding joints. Optics & Laser Technology, 149:107889. [17]LiuP, SunSY, HuJY, 2019. Effect of laser shock peening on the microstructure and corrosion resistance in the surface of weld nugget zone and heat-affected zone of FSW joints of 7050 Al alloy. Optics & Laser Technology, 112:1-7. [18]LiuY, TsangKS, Zhi’EnET, et al., 2021. Investigation on material characteristics and fatigue crack behavior of thermite welded rail joint. Construction and Building Materials, 276:122249. [19]MaichAA, GronskyR, KomvopoulosK, 2024. Microstructure evolution and fretting wear mechanisms of steels undergoing oscillatory sliding contact in dry atmosphere. Materials, 17(8):1737. [20]NejadRM, ShariatiM, FarhangdoostK, 2016. Effect of wear on rolling contact fatigue crack growth in rails. Tribology International, 94:118-125. [21]PereiraHB, EcheverriEAA, AlvesLHD, et al., 2024. Influence of HAZ microstructure on RCF under twin-disc test of a flash-butt welded rail. Wear, 546-547:205324. [22]RemesH, GalloP, JelovicaJ, et al., 2020. Fatigue strength modelling of high-performing welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 135:105555. [23]SallabaF, RolofF, EhlersS, et al., 2022. Relation between the fatigue and fracture ductile-brittle transition in S500 welded steel joints. Metals, 12(3):385. [24]SeoJW, JunHK, KwonSJ, et al., 2016. Rolling contact fatigue and wear of two different rail steels under rolling–sliding contact. International Journal of Fatigue, 83:184-194. [25]ShenMX, LiJQ, LiL, et al., 2024. Adhesion and damage behaviour of wheel–rail rolling–sliding contact suffering intermittent airflow with different humidities and ambient temperatures. Tribology Letters, 72(1):18. [26]ShiHC, ShiLB, DingHH, et al., 2019. Influence of laser strengthening techniques on anti-wear and anti-fatigue properties of rail welding joint. Engineering Failure Analysis, 101:72-85. [27]TabaieS, Rézaï-AriaF, FlipoBCD, et al., 2021. Grain size and misorientation evolution in linear friction welding of additively manufactured IN718 to forged superalloy AD730TM. Materials Characterization, 171:110766. [28]TanJH, GaoZK, RenS, et al., 2024. Improving the microstructures and mechanical properties of U71Mn rail steel liner friction welded joint by normalizing treatment. Materials Today Communications, 38:107736. [29]WangCS, WuB, HangW, et al., 2024. Precise surface machining of fused silica using high stability atmospheric pressure microwave plasma jet with a new internal electrode. Surfaces and Interfaces, 49:104379. [30]WangK, MaQT, XuJM, et al., 2022. Theoretical study of laminar plasma quenching of rail steel using the fluid-solid-thermal coupling method. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 179:107708. [31]WangK, LaiJ, XuJM, et al., 2023a. Multiscale analysis of wheel-rail rolling contact wear and damage mechanisms using molecular dynamics and explicit finite elements. Tribology International, 185:108574. [32]WangK, BaiTS, XuJM, et al., 2023b. Surface treatment of rail to enhance rolling contact fatigue and wear resistance: combined spot laminar plasma quenching and tempering method. Construction and Building Materials, 401:132832. [33]WangK, BaiTS, XuJM, et al., 2024a. Analysis of rolling contact fatigue and wear characteristics of aging-treated laminar plasma strip quenching rails. Wear, 540-541:205245. [34]WangK, BaiTS, XuJM, et al., 2024b. Investigation into the mechanisms of corrosion-induced rolling contact fatigue crack initiation and propagation in pearlitic rails. Engineering Failure Analysis, 163:108614. [35]WangK, YangJ, TianCX, et al., 2025. Study on gradient microstructural characteristics and crack propagation mechanisms in plasma-quenched rails and white etching layer containing rails. Tribology International, 211:110864. [36]XuJM, WangK, ZhangRH, et al., 2020. An investigation into the microstructure and tribological properties of rail materials with plasma selective quenching. Tribology International, 146:106032. [37]XuJM, WangK, LiangXY, et al., 2021. Investigation on wear and damage characteristics of high-speed rail steel with plasma selective quenching. Wear, 486-487:204100. [38]ZengDF, LuLT, GongYH, et al., 2017. Influence of solid solution strengthening on spalling behavior of railway wheel steel. Wear, 372-373:158-168. [39]ZhangSY, LiuQY, WangWJ, et al., 2022. Implications of water medium for the evolution of rolling contact fatigue under rail surface defect conditions. Tribology International, 175:107870. [40]ZhaoJZ, MiaoHC, KanQH, et al., 2021. Numerical investigation on the rolling contact wear and fatigue of laser dispersed quenched U71Mn rail. International Journal of Fatigue, 143:106010. [41]ZhaoP, LiuZ, DuF, et al., 2018. Ultra-high cycle fatigue property of a multiphase steel microalloyed with niobium. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 718:1-8. [42]ZhaoP, XuZ, WangM, et al., 2021. High cycle fatigue behavior and microstructure of a high-speed rail material. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 824:141804. [43]ZhuH, BaiTS, ShenBR, et al., 2024. An investigation into crack initiation and extension mechanism of laminar plasma quenched-tempered rail material with different quenched zones. Tribology International, 199:109983. [44]ZhuH, BaiTS, XuJM, et al., 2025. Surface treatment of rail welded joints to balance wear in different zones: laminar plasma inhomogeneous quenching method. Wear, 580-581:206236. CLC number: On-line Access: 2026-04-18 Received: 2025-05-15 Revision Accepted: 2025-11-07 Crosschecked: 2026-04-20 Cited: 0 Clicked: 941 Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>