Abstract: Structural optimization plays a crucial role in reducing the cost of offshore wind power, particularly in deep-water regions where the weight of jacket foundations increases substantially. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the water-depth range that is suitable for jacket foundations, and the threshold where floating foundations become more viable. Existing studies have not quantitatively analyzed how water depth affects jacket foundation mass, and have often struggled to handle the high dimensionality and stringent constraints inherent in jacket foundation optimization problems. In this study, we propose an optimization framework that couples parametric finite element analysis with a genetic algorithm to minimize the mass of jacket foundations based on three actual engineering projects at varying water depths. A novel population initialization strategy incorporating engineering experience-based solutions is introduced to improve convergence efficiency and solution quality. Comparative analysis against preliminary designs and existing offshore wind projects demonstrates the model’s ability to achieve cost-effective solutions, specifically reducing required jacket masses by 18.66%, 20.98%, and 17.22% at depths of 30.06, 60.23, and 89.81 m, respectively. The results reveal a 122.94% increase in jacket mass—from 1431.28 to 3190.90 t—as water depth increases from 30.06 to 89.81 m. The jacket foundation demonstrates superior cost effectiveness in shallow to moderate water depths, as the unit weight per megawatt (MW) of floating foundations is 97.51% and 35.74% higher at water depths of 60.23 and 89.81 m, respectively. Accordingly, the applicable water-depth threshold between the jacket and floating foundations is estimated to be approximately 100 m. The proposed optimization model offers a novel methodology and practical insights for the optimal design of offshore wind turbine support structures in varying marine environments.

结合有限元分析和遗传算法的不同水深海上风机导管架基础经验导向优化

[1]AchmusM, KuoYS, Abdel-RahmanK, 2009. Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(5):725-735.

[2]AlHamaydehM, BarakatS, NasifO, 2017. Optimization of support structures for offshore wind turbines using genetic algorithm with domain-trimming. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017(1):5978375.

[3]American Petroleum Institute (API), 2019a. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design. API Publishing, Washington, USA.

[4]American Petroleum Institute (API), 2019b. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistance Factor Design. API Publishing, Washington, USA.

[5]Benítez-SuárezB, Quevedo-ReinaR, ÁlamoGM, et al., 2025. PSO-based design and optimization of jacket substructures for offshore wind turbines. Marine Structures, 101:103759.

[6]ChengXL, LiY, MuK, et al., 2024. Seismic response of tripod suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine in sands. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 177:108353.

[7]ChewKH, TaiK, NgEYK, et al., 2016. Analytical gradient-based optimization of offshore wind turbine substructures under fatigue and extreme loads. Marine Structures, 47:23-41.

[8]Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2021. Support Structures for Wind Turbines, DNV-ST-0126. DNV, Oslo, Norway.

[9]DuYM, KongDQ, WangSL, et al., 2023. Fatigue analysis of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 44(12):3639-3652 (in Chinese).

[10]DuanBS, GuoCQ, LiuH, 2022. A hybrid genetic-particle swarm optimization algorithm for multi-constraint optimization problems. Soft Computing, 26(21):11695-11711.

[11]EstebanMD, CouñagoB, López-GutiérrezJS, et al., 2015. Gravity based support structures for offshore wind turbine generators: review of the installation process. Ocean Engineering, 110:281-291.

[12]EstebanMD, López-GutiérrezJS, NegroV, 2019. Gravity-based foundations in the offshore wind sector. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(3):64.

[13]FengS, SongYP, ZhangRX, 2000. Optimum design of structure shape for offshore jacket platforms. China Ocean Engineering, 14(4):435-445.

[14]GavinK, IgoeD, DohertyP, 2011. Piles for offshore wind turbines: a state-of-the-art review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 164(4):245-256.

[15]GentilsT, WangL, KoliosA, 2017. Integrated structural optimisation of offshore wind turbine support structures based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm. Applied Energy, 199:187-204.

[16]GoldbergDE, 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, USA.

[17]GrecuS, IbsenLB, BarariA, 2021. Winkler springs for axial response of suction bucket foundations in cohesionless soil. Soils and Foundations, 61(1):64-79.

[18]HongS, McMorlandJ, ZhangHX, et al., 2024. Floating offshore wind farm installation, challenges and opportunities: a comprehensive survey. Ocean Engineering, 304:117793.

[19]JalbiS, BhattacharyaS, 2020. Concept design of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139:106357.

[20]JindalS, RahmanliU, AleemM, et al., 2024. Geotechnical challenges in monopile foundations and performance assessment of current design methodologies. Ocean Engineering, 310:118469.

[21]LiD, SunT, YiC, et al., 2025. Development of deep-sea floating wind power technology. Strategic Study of CAE, 27(2):108-122 (in Chinese).

[22]LiZC, HuP, MaJX, et al., 2022. Analysis and prospect of offshore wind power development in China. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 34(5):229-236 (in Chinese).

[23]LiZY, XuB, YuanGK, 2024. Optimization for offshore prestressed concrete-steel hybrid wind turbine support structure with pile foundation using a parallel modified particle swarm algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(5):826.

[24]LiuYC, LiSW, YiQ, et al., 2016. Developments in semi-submersible floating foundations supporting wind turbines: a comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60:433-449.

[25]LuhGC, LinCY, 2008. Optimal design of truss structures using ant algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 36(4):365-379.

[26]OhKY, NamW, RyuMS, et al., 2018. A review of foundations of offshore wind energy convertors: current status and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88:16-36.

[27]PiirainenA, de AndresA, HamiltonS, 2020. E&P Offshore: Fixed or Floating Foundations—Which Brings Value for Money in Deeper Water? https://www.hartenergy.com/exclusives/ep-offshore-fixed-or-floating-foundations-which-brings-value-money-deeper-water-188314.

[28]Rizk-AllahRM, SnášelV, DengXF, et al., 2024. Topological optimization of offshore wind farm cable routing system based on an improved equilibrium optimization algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 313:119539.

[29]SakaMP, HasançebiO, EserH, et al., 2025. Historical evolution of structural optimization techniques for steel skeletal structures including industrial design applications. Engineering Optimization, 57(1):69-129.

[30]ShemshakiE, HaddadMH, MashayekhiM, et al., 2025. A novel hybrid metaheuristic MPA-PSO to optimize the properties of viscous dampers. Buildings, 15(8):1330.

[31]ShiW, ParkH, ChungC, et al., 2013. Load analysis and comparison of different jacket foundations. Renewable Energy, 54:201-210.

[32]SyalsabilaF, PrastiantoRW, RosyidDM, 2022. Sizing optimization using genetic algorithm to achieve minimal offshore structure. Rekayasa, 15(2):129-136.

[33]TianXJ, SunXY, LiuGJ, et al., 2022. Optimization design of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine using topology optimization method. Ocean Engineering, 243:110084.

[34]WangL, LiuYG, LiZS, et al., 2023. Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization (NRBTO) scheme for continuum structures based on the strength constraint parameterized level set method and interval mathematics. Thin-Walled Structures, 188:110856.

[35]WilliamsR, ZhaoF, 2024. Global Offshore Wind Report 2024. Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels, Belgium.

[36]YuY, WeiMX, YuJX, et al., 2023. Reliability-based design method for marine structures combining topology, shape, and size optimization. Ocean Engineering, 286:115490.

[37]ZhouYM, ZhangJH, LongK, et al., 2025. Topology optimization on a jacket structure for offshore wind turbines by altering structural design domain. Applied Ocean Research, 154:104421.