
Zifei WANG, Xiangxian ZHU, Congxin LI, Daidai CHEN, Zhitao LIU, Longhua MA, Jili TAO, Hongye SU. Real-time degradation modeling for automotive PEMFC stacks: a multi-scale fusion network validated on an industrial 215-channel system[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2500337 @article{title="Real-time degradation modeling for automotive PEMFC stacks: a multi-scale fusion network validated on an industrial 215-channel system", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
汽车质子交换膜燃料电池堆实时退化建模:基于工业级215通道系统验证的多尺度融合网络机构:1浙大宁波理工学院,信息科学与工程学院,中国宁波,315100;2浙江大学,工业控制技术全国重点实验室,中国杭州,310027;3宁波均胜电子股份有限公司,中国宁波,315040;4宁波绿动氢能科技研究院有限公司,中国宁波,315033 目的:准确预测工业级215通道车用质子交换膜燃料电池电堆在动态工况下的长期退化行为,解决传统方法在实验室条件、小规模电堆和噪声干扰下的预测精度低、泛化能力差的问题,为燃料电池汽车的健康管理与寿命预测提供可靠模型。 创新点:1.提出多尺度双向融合网络,融合通道联合自适应噪声相关阈值去噪算法,实现无先验建模的多物理场噪声抑制;2.引入多尺度分解模块解耦电压恢复与老化趋势;3.设计轻量化双向融合模块,在提升预测精度的同时显著减少参数量,适配车载边缘计算资源限制。 方法:1.构建215通道联合仿真平台采集实车工况退化数据;2.采用噪声相关阈值算法动态抑制传感器噪声;3.通过多尺度分解提取不同时间尺度的退化特征;4.利用双向融合模块整合电堆级趋势与单电池级波动;5.基于均方根误差、平均绝对误差等指标与长短期记忆(LSTM)、门控循环单元等模型进行单步/多步预测对比及消融实验验证。 结论:1.多尺度双向融合网络在关键退化阶段(285.0→255.0 V)实现了0.0180的均方根误差,比LSTM-attention提升18.6%;2.多步预测误差较LSTM-attention和一维卷积神经网络分别降低24.5%与55.2%;3.模型参数量减少36.8%,满足车载电子控制单元资源限制,具备良好的工程应用前景与物理可解释性。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]BenaggouneK, YueML, JemeiS, et al., 2022. A data-driven method for multi-step-ahead prediction and long-term prognostics of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy, 313:118835. [2]BresselM, HilairetM, HisselD, et al., 2016. Extended Kalman filter for prognostic of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy, 164:220-227. [3]ChenK, LaghroucheS, DjerdirA, 2019. Degradation model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on a novel hybrid method. Applied Energy, 252:113439. [4]ChenK, BadjiA, LaghroucheS, et al., 2022. Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells degradation prediction using multi-kernel relevance vector regression and whale optimization algorithm. Applied Energy, 318:119099. [5]ChengYJ, ZerhouniN, LuC, 2018. A hybrid remaining useful life prognostic method for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(27):12314-12327. [6]HeK, LiuZY, SunYN, et al., 2022. Degradation prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using auto-encoder based health indicator and long short-term memory network. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(82):35055-35067. [7]HeWB, LiuT, MingWY, et al., 2024. Progress in prediction of remaining useful life of hydrogen fuel cells based on deep learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192:114193. [8]JouinM, GouriveauR, HisselD, et al., 2014. Prognostics of PEM fuel cell in a particle filtering framework. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(1):481-494. [9]LiCZ, LinW, WuHY, et al., 2023. Performance degradation decomposition-ensemble prediction of PEMFC using CEEMDAN and dual data-driven model. Renewable Energy, 215:118913. [10]LiuH, ChenJ, HisselD, et al., 2019. A multi-scale hybrid degradation index for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 437:226916. [11]LiuMY, WangC, ZhangJB, et al., 2014. Diagnosis of membrane electrode assembly degradation with drive cycle test technique. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(26):14370-14375. [12]LiuZY, MaoL, HuZY, et al., 2022. A novel densely connected neural network for proton exchange membrane fuel cell fault diagnosis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(94):40041-40053. [13]MaR, YangT, BreazE, et al., 2018. Data-driven proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation predication through deep learning method. Applied Energy, 231:102-115. [14]MaR, ChaiXY, GengRX, et al., 2023. Recent progress and challenges of multi-stack fuel cell systems: fault detection and reconfiguration, energy management strategies, and applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 285:117015. [15]RenP, PeiPC, LiYH, et al., 2020. Degradation mechanisms of proton exchange membrane fuel cell under typical automotive operating conditions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 80:100859. [16]SahajpalK, RanaKPS, KumarV, 2023. Accurate long-term prognostics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using recurrent and convolutional neural networks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(78):30532-30555. [17]ShinD, YooS, 2023. Diagnostic method for PEM fuel cell states using probability distribution-based loss component analysis for voltage loss decomposition. Applied Energy, 330:120340. [18]SunW, YanR, JinR, et al., 2024. LiteFormer: a lightweight and efficient Transformer for rotating machine fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 73(2):1258-1269. [19]TianL, GaoY, YangHY, et al., 2025. Multi-scenario long-term degradation prediction of PEMFC based on generative inference informer model. Applied Energy, 377:124398. [20]TianZ, WangJH, Al-DurraA, et al., 2023. A novel aging prediction method of fuel cell based on empirical mode decomposition and complexity threshold quantitative criterion. Journal of Power Sources, 574:233120. [21]WangC, DouMF, LiZL, et al., 2023. Data-driven prognostics based on time-frequency analysis and symbolic recurrent neural network for fuel cells under dynamic load. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 233:109123. [22]WangPH, LiuH, ChenJ, et al., 2021. A novel degradation model of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for state of health estimation and prognostics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(61):31353-31361. [23]WilberforceT, OlabiAG, 2021. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance prediction using artificial neural network. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(8):6037-6050. [24]WilberforceT, AlaswadA, Garcia–PerezA, et al., 2023. Remaining useful life prediction for proton exchange membrane fuel cells using combined convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(1):291-303. [25]WuYM, BreazE, GaoF, et al., 2016. A modified relevance vector machine for PEM fuel-cell stack aging prediction. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52(3):2573-2581. [26]XiaZT, WangYN, MaLH, et al., 2022. A hybrid prognostic method for proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell with decomposition forecasting framework based on AEKF and LSTM. Sensors, 23(1):166. [27]YiFY, ShuX, ZhouJM, et al., 2025. Remaining useful life prediction of PEMFC based on matrix long short-term memory. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 111:228-237. [28]ZhouDM, GaoF, BreazE, et al., 2017. Degradation prediction of PEM fuel cell using a moving window based hybrid prognostic approach. Energy, 138:1175-1186. [29]ZhouSW, ShearingPR, BrettDJL, et al., 2022. Machine learning as an online diagnostic tool for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 31:100867. [30]ZuoJ, LvH, ZhouDM, et al., 2021. Deep learning based prognostic framework towards proton exchange membrane fuel cell for automotive application. Applied Energy, 281:115937. CLC number: On-line Access: 2026-05-26 Received: 2025-07-22 Revision Accepted: 2025-12-16 Crosschecked: 2026-05-26 Cited: 0 Clicked: 1414 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>