CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-12-06
Received: 2023-07-11
Revision Accepted: 2023-12-23
Crosschecked: 2024-12-06
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1150
Lei LIU, Lin JING, Tian LI, Kaiyun WANG. Effects of high geotemperature and high altitude on the pressure wave of high-speed trains running in a long tunnel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2300361 @article{title="Effects of high geotemperature and high altitude on the pressure wave of high-speed trains running in a long tunnel", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
高地温和高海拔对高速列车长大隧道运行压力波的影响机构:西南交通大学,轨道交通运载系统全国重点实验室,中国成都,610031 目的:高速列车隧道运行时产生的空气压力波会对车体及隧道结构的安全造成不良影响,是铁路隧道设计中需要解决的关键科技问题之一。高海拔地区高速铁路隧道具有长度大的显著特点,并且低气压、高地热等特殊线路环境条件将会对隧道内空气的密度、粘度等参数产生影响,从而影响列车隧道运行时产生的空气压力波的特性。研究高地温和高海拔对高速列车长大隧道运行压力波的影响,对于保证隧道高速列车在该地区隧道内运行时车体及隧道的结构安全有重要价值,并可为隧道的设计提供技术支持。 创新点:1.通过分析隧道长度对于高速列车隧道运行压力波特性的影响,确定具有代表性的隧道长度用于仿真模拟,以降低计算成本和有效反映高速列车长大隧道运行压力波特性。2.建立的计算空气动力学仿真模型中考虑了高温沿整个隧道的分布情况,可模拟更加真实的高地温环境。 方法:采用三维、非定常、可压缩雷诺时均方程和RNGk-ε湍流模型,研究高地温和高海拔对高速列车隧道通过和隧道交会压力波特性的影响。 结论:1.与正常环境温度的情况相比,当高速列车通过高地温隧道时,隧道和列车表面的压力峰值减小,并且出现得越来越早。2.与正常环境温度的情况相比,当高速列车在高地温隧道中交会时,隧道表面压力最大值沿隧道分布的对称点向隧道入口移动,压力最小值的分布也发生变化。3.随着海拔的上升,列车隧道通过及交会时,隧道和列车表面的压力波形以及列车两侧的压差保持不变,并且峰值线性减小。4.列车在高海拔、高地温的长大隧道中运行时,列车和隧道表面的压力幅值整体减小;然而,温度的变化会影响隧道表面压力幅值出现的位置,在隧道设计和维护时,这些位置可能需要更多的关注以及更准确的定位。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]BakerCJ, 2014. A review of train aerodynamics Part 1–Fundamentals. The Aeronautical Journal, 118(1201):201-228. [2]CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation), 2010. Railway Applications-Aerodynamics-Part 6: Requirements and Test Procedures for Cross Wind Assessment, CEN-EN14067-6:2010. [3]ChenMG, MaoJ, XiYH, 2023. Aerodynamic effect analysis of high-speed train entering and leaving single and double track tunnels under crosswind. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 12(2):304-326. https://doi:10.1080/23248378.2023.2165182 [4]ChenXD, LiuTH, ZhouXS, et al., 2017. Analysis of the aerodynamic effects of different nose lengths on two trains intersecting in a tunnel at 350 km/h. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 66:77-90. [5]ChuCR, ChienSY, WangCY, et al., 2014. Numerical simulation of two trains intersecting in a tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 42:161-174. [6]GilbertT, BakerC, QuinnA, 2013a. Aerodynamic pressures around high-speed trains: the transition from unconfined to enclosed spaces. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 227(6):609-622. [7]GilbertT, BakerCJ, QuinnA, 2013b. Gusts caused by high-speed trains in confined spaces and tunnels. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 121:39-48. [8]HuangJ, HeH, YangWC, et al., 2022. Influence of altitude on transient pressure and ride comfort in railway tunnel. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 19(3):608-615 (in Chinese). [9]JiP, WangTT, WuF, 2019. Calculation grid and turbulence model for numerical simulating pressure fluctuations in high-speed train tunnel. Journal of Central South University, 26(10):2870-2877. [10]JingL, LiuK, RenM, 2019. The transient response of car body and side windows for high-speed trains passing by each other in a tunnel. Composites Part B: Engineering, 166:284-297. [11]LiT, LiangH, ZhangJ, et al., 2023. Numerical study on aerodynamic resistance reduction of high-speed train using vortex generator. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 17(1):e2153925. [12]LiWH, LiuTH, ZhangJ, et al., 2017. Aerodynamic study of two opposing moving trains in a tunnel based on different nose contours. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 10(5):1375-1386. [13]LiWH, LiuTH, HuoXS, et al., 2019. Influence of the enlarged portal length on pressure waves in railway tunnels with cross-section expansion. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 190:10-22. [14]LiWH, LiuTH, ChenZW, et al., 2020. Comparative study on the unsteady slipstream induced by a single train and two trains passing each other in a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 198:104095. [15]LiWH, LiuTH, Martinez-VazquezP, et al., 2021. Aerodynamic effects of a high-speed train travelling through adjoining & separated tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 113:103973. [16]LiWH, LiuTH, Martinez-VazquezP, et al., 2022. Aerodynamic effects on a railway tunnel with partially changed cross-sectional area. Journal of Central South University, 29(8):2589-2604. [17]LingL, HuYL, YangZY, et al., 2022. Effect of Sichuan–Tibet railway special meteorological environment on tunnel aerodynamic drag of electric multiple unit train. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(1):158-165(in Chinese). [18]LiuF, YaoS, ZhangJ, et al., 2018. Field measurements of aerodynamic pressures in high-speed railway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 72:97-106. [19]LiuK, JingL, RenM, 2018. The characteristics of air wave induced by two high-speed trains passing by each other in a tunnel. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(3):1-16. [20]LiuTH, ChenXD, LiWH, et al., 2017a. Field study on the interior pressure variations in high-speed trains passing through tunnels of different lengths. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 169:54-66. [21]LiuTH, ChenZW, ChenXD, et al., 2017b. Transient loads and their influence on the dynamic responses of trains in a tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 66:121-133. [22]LiuTH, ChenZW, ZhouXS, et al., 2018. A CFD analysis of the aerodynamics of a high-speed train passing through a windbreak transition under crosswind. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1):137-151. [23]LuoJJ, 2016. Aerodynamic effect induced by high-speed train entering into tunnel in high altitude area. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 51(4):607-614(in Chinese). [24]MiyachiT, IidaM, FukudaT, et al., 2016. Nondimensional maximum pressure gradient of tunnel compression waves generated by offset running axisymmetric trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 157:23-35. [25]NiuJQ, ZhouD, LiuTH, et al., 2017. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance of a couple multiple units high-speed train. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(5):681-703. [26]NiuJQ, ZhouD, LiuF, et al., 2018a. Effect of train length on fluctuating aerodynamic pressure wave in tunnels and method for determining the amplitude of pressure wave on trains. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 80:277-289. [27]NiuJQ, ZhouD, WangYM, 2018b. Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 182:1-15. [28]RaghunathanRS, KimHD, SetoguchiT, 2002. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(6-7):469-514. [29]WangJY, WangTT, YangMZ, et al., 2021. Effect of localized high temperature on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train passing through a tunnel. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 208:104444. [30]WangJY, WangTT, ZhangL, et al., 2022. Research on the characteristics of micro-pressure waves in high-temperature geothermal railway tunnels and a self-satisfying mitigation method. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 225:104998. [31]WangTT, WuF, YangMZ, et al., 2018. Reduction of pressure transients of high-speed train passing through a tunnel by cross-section increase. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 183:235-242. [32]XueRD, XiongXH, WangKW, et al., 2023. Influence of variable cross-section on pressure transients and unsteady slipstream in a long tunnel when high-speed train passes through. Journal of Central South University, 30(3):1027-1046. [33]YangWC, DengE, LeiMF, et al., 2019. Transient aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains when passing through two windproof facilities under crosswinds: a comparative study. Engineering Structures, 188:729-744. [34]ZarnaghshA, AboualiO, EmdadH, et al., 2019. A numerical study of the train-induced unsteady airflow in a tunnel and its effects on the performance of jet fans. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 187:1-14. [35]ZhangDL, SunZY, FangQ, 2022. Scientific problems and research proposals for Sichuan–Tibet railway tunnel construction. Underground Space, 7(3):419-439. [36]ZhangJ, 2021. Research on Distribution Characteristics of Geothermal Field and Thermal Hazard Prevention Measures in Layue Tunnel. MS Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China (in Chinese). [37]ZhangL, ThurowK, StollN, et al., 2018. Influence of the geometry of equal-transect oblique tunnel portal on compression wave and micro-pressure wave generated by high-speed trains entering tunnels. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 178:1-17. [38]ZhangL, LiT, ZhangJY, 2021. Research on aerodynamic shape optimization of trains with different dimensional design variables. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 9(5):479-501. [39]ZhaoKM, YuanYP, JiangFJ, et al., 2023. Numerical investigation on temperature–humidity field under mechanical ventilation in the construction period of hot-humid tunnel along the Sichuan–Tibet Railway. Underground Space, 8:123-143. [40]ZhouMM, LiuTH, XiaYT, et al., 2022. Comparative investigations of pressure waves induced by trains passing through a tunnel with different speed modes. Journal of Central South University, 29(8):2639-2653. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>