Similar articles

Abstract: controller area network (CAN) is a widely used fieldbus protocol in various industrial applications. To understand the network behavior under errors for the optimal design of networked control systems, the message response time of the CAN network needs to be analyzed. In this study, a novel delay time distribution analysis method for the response messages is proposed when considering errors. In this method the complex message queues are decomposed into typical message patterns and cases. First, a stochastic fault model is developed, and the probability factor is defined to calculate the error distribution. Then the message delay time distribution for the single slave node configuration is analyzed based on the error distribution. Next, based on the delay time distribution analysis of typical patterns and cases, an analysis framework of message delay time distribution for the master/slave configuration is developed. The testbed is constructed and case studies are conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology under different network configurations. Experimental results show that the delay time distributions calculated by the proposed method agree well with the actual observations.

控制器局域网在错误状态下的报文延时分布研究

[1]Bosch R, 1991. CAN Specification Version 2.0. Technical Report, Rober Bousch GmbH. http://esd.cs.ucr.edu/webres/can20.pdf

[2]Broster I, Burns A, Rodríguez-Navas G, 2005. Timing analysis of real-time communication under electromagnetic interference. Real-Time Syst, 30(1-2):55-81.

[3]Chen X, Liu LY, Lü WJ, et al., 2012. Modeling and analysis of response time of CAN bus based on queueing theory. J Tianjin Univ, 45(3):228-235 (in Chinese).

[4]Davis RI, Navet N, 2012. Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis for messages with arbitrary deadlines in FIFO and work-conserving queues. Proc $9^text{th}$ IEEE Int Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, p.33-42.

[5]Davis RI, Burns A, Bril RJ, et al., 2007. Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis: refuted, revisited and revised. Real-Time Syst, 35(3):239-272.

[6]Davis RI, Kollmann S, Pollex V, et al., 2011. Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis with FIFO queues. Proc 23^rd Euromicro Conf on Real-Time Systems, p.45-56.

[7]Davis RI, Kollmann S, Pollex V, et al., 2013. Schedulability analysis for controller area network (CAN) with FIFO queues priority queues and gateways. Real-Time Syst, 49(1):73-116.

[8]Farsi M, Ratcliff K, Barbosa M, 1999. An overview of controller area network. Comput Contr Eng J, 10(3):113-120.

[9]Hansson HA, Nolte T, Norström C, et al., 2002. Integrating reliability and timing analysis of CAN-based systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 49(6):1240-1250.

[10]Kumar M, Kumar A, Srividya VA, 2009. Response-time modeling of controller area network (CAN). In: Garg V, Wattenhofer R, Kothapalli K (Eds.), Distributed Computing and Networking, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p.163-174.

[11]Lei Y, Yuan Y, Zhao JZ, 2014. Model-based detection and monitoring of the intermittent connections for CAN networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 61(6):2912-2921.

[12]Lei Y, Xie H, Yuan Y, et al., 2015. Fault location for the intermittent connection problems on CAN networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 62(11):7203-7213.

[13]Mubeen S, Mäki-Turja J, Sjödin M, 2014. Extending worst case response-time analysis for mixed messages in controller area network with priority and FIFO queues. IEEE Access, 2:365-380.

[14]Mubeen S, Mäki-Turja J, Sjödin M, 2015. Integrating mixed transmission and practical limitations with the worst-case response-time analysis for controller area network. J Syst Softw, 99:66-84.

[15]Navet N, Song YQ, Simonot F, 2000. Worst-case deadline failure probability in real-time applications distributed over controller area network. J Syst Archit, 46(7):607-617.

[16]Sun YC, Yang F, Lei Y, 2015. Message response time distribution analysis for controller area network containing errors. Chinese Automation Congress, p.1052-1057.

[17]Tindell K, Burns A, 1994. Guaranteed Message Latencies for Distributed Safety-Critical Hard Real-Time Control Networks. Technical Report, Real-Time System Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of York, England.

[18]Tindell K, Burns A, Wellings AJ, 1994. An extendible approach for analyzing fixed priority hard real-time tasks. Real-Time Syst, 6(2):133-151.

[19]Tindell K, Burns A, Wellings AJ, 1995a. Analysis of hard real-time communications. Real-Time Syst, 9(2):147-171.

[20]Tindell K, Burns A, Wellings AJ, 1995b. Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times. Contr Eng Pract, 3(8):1163-1169.

[21]Yomsi PM, Bertrand D, Navet N, et al., 2012. Controller area network (CAN): response time analysis with offsets. Proc $9^text{th}$ IEEE Int Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, p.43-52.

[22]Zeng HB, di Natale M, Giusto P, et al., 2010. Using statistical methods to compute the probability distribution of message response time in controller area network. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 6(4):678-691.