CLC number: Q939.92; Q94
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 6
Clicked: 6018
OJO O.O., AJAYI A.O., ANIBIJUWON I.I.. Antibacterial potency of methanol extracts of lower plants[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2007, 8(3): 189-191.
@article{title="Antibacterial potency of methanol extracts of lower plants",
author="OJO O.O., AJAYI A.O., ANIBIJUWON I.I.",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="8",
number="3",
pages="189-191",
year="2007",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2007.B0189"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Antibacterial potency of methanol extracts of lower plants
%A OJO O.O.
%A AJAYI A.O.
%A ANIBIJUWON I.I.
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 8
%N 3
%P 189-191
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2007
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0189
TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibacterial potency of methanol extracts of lower plants
A1 - OJO O.O.
A1 - AJAYI A.O.
A1 - ANIBIJUWON I.I.
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 8
IS - 3
SP - 189
EP - 191
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2007
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0189
Abstract: Antibacterial potency of methanol extracts of three green lower plants, Pneumatopteris afra, Platycerium bifurcatum and Nephrolepsis bisserata was determined using agar dilution method on clinical strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp. and Salmomelia typhi. Antibacterial activities were observed at concentrations of 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100.0 µg/ml. Their minimum inhibitory concentrations ranged from 12.5~100 μg/ml. extracts of P. afra and P. bifurcatum were most active. Antibacterial activities observed with N. bisserata were less pronounced with no detectable activity at extract concentrations of 12.5 and 25.0 µg/ml. E. coli, together with S. aureus appeared to be the most susceptible of the test bacteria while Klebsiella spp. was least sensitive. The significance of our findings is discussed.
[1] Alanis, A.D., Glazada, F., Cervantes, J.A., Tarres, J., Ceballas, G.M., 2005. Antibacterial properties of some plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. J. Ethnopharmacol., 100(1-2):153-157.
[2] Baker, C.N., Hawkinson, R.W., 1993. Inoculum standardization in antimicrobial susceptibility test evaluation of the overnight aquaculture and rapid innoculum standarization system. J. Clin. Microbiol. World, 17:451-457.
[3] Jorgnersteen, J.H., 1998. Selection of antimicrobial agents for routine testing in clinical microbiology laboratory: diagnosis of microbial infection. Pharmacol., 16:245-249.
[4] Kafaru, E., 1994. Immense Help Formative Workshop. In: Essential. Pharmacology, 1st Ed. Elizabeth Kafaru Publishers, Lagos, Nigeria, p.11-14.
[5] Olukoya, D.K., Idiaka, N., Odugbemi, A., 2003. Antibacterial activities of some plants in Nigeria. J. Ethonopharm., 4:15-22.
[6] Oyagade, J.O., 1998. Antimicrobial efficacy of stem bark extract of Terminalic schimpeliana. Department of Biology Science Research Communication, Unilorin., 9:143-149.
[7] Saxena, D.K., Saxena, A.A., 2002. Role of Plant Tissue Culture Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development. In: Gyanodaya Prakashen. Nainity, India, p.605-621.
[8] Smith, C.M., Reynard, A.M., 1992. Textbook of Pharmacology. Saunders, Philadelphia, p.362-385.
[9] Sofowora, A., 1998. Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicines. In: Africa Spectrum Books. Ibadan, p.6-13.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>