CLC number: R378.99
On-line Access: 2018-05-05
Received: 2017-07-24
Revision Accepted: 2017-09-06
Crosschecked: 2018-04-18
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5547
Wen-dong Wang, Nan-nan Zhang, Warren Chanda, Min Liu, Syed Riaz ud Din, Yun-peng Diao, Lei Liu, Jing Cao, Xiao-li Wang, Xing-yun Li, An-hong Ning, Min Huang, Min-tao Zhong. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the lipid extract from Mantidis ootheca on Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2018, 19(5): 364-371.
@article{title="Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the lipid extract from Mantidis ootheca on Pseudomonas aeruginosa",
author="Wen-dong Wang, Nan-nan Zhang, Warren Chanda, Min Liu, Syed Riaz ud Din, Yun-peng Diao, Lei Liu, Jing Cao, Xiao-li Wang, Xing-yun Li, An-hong Ning, Min Huang, Min-tao Zhong",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="19",
number="5",
pages="364-371",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1700356"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the lipid extract from Mantidis ootheca on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
%A Wen-dong Wang
%A Nan-nan Zhang
%A Warren Chanda
%A Min Liu
%A Syed Riaz ud Din
%A Yun-peng Diao
%A Lei Liu
%A Jing Cao
%A Xiao-li Wang
%A Xing-yun Li
%A An-hong Ning
%A Min Huang
%A Min-tao Zhong
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 19
%N 5
%P 364-371
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1700356
TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the lipid extract from Mantidis ootheca on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
A1 - Wen-dong Wang
A1 - Nan-nan Zhang
A1 - Warren Chanda
A1 - Min Liu
A1 - Syed Riaz ud Din
A1 - Yun-peng Diao
A1 - Lei Liu
A1 - Jing Cao
A1 - Xiao-li Wang
A1 - Xing-yun Li
A1 - An-hong Ning
A1 - Min Huang
A1 - Min-tao Zhong
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 19
IS - 5
SP - 364
EP - 371
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1700356
Abstract: The aim of this study is to assess the antibacterial and anti-biofilm properties of the lipid extract from Mantidis ootheca against the gentamycin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The chemical composition of the lipid extract and its relative proportion were determined using the technique of gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). antibacterial susceptibility tests were performed using a disc diffusion assay and the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) was determined by way of the agar dilution method. The anti-biofilm test was carried out with crystal violet staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were 16 compounds detected, and the most abundant components were sesquiterpenoids, monoterpenes, and trace aromatic compounds. The MIC for P. aeruginosa was 4 mg/ml and the eradication effect on preformed biofilms was established and compared with a ciprofloxacin control. The results of our study indicated that a lipid extract from M. ootheca could be used as a topical and antibacterial agent with anti-biofilm activity in the future.
[1]Artini M, Papa R, Barbato G, et al., 2012. Bacterial biofilm formation inhibitory activity revealed for plant derived natural compounds. Bioorg Med Chem, 20(2):920-926.
[2]Baker DD, Chu M, Oza U, et al., 2007. The value of natural products to future pharmaceutical discovery. Nat Prod Rep, 24(6):1225-1244.
[3]Berendonk TU, Manaia CM, Merlin C, et al., 2015. Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework. Nat Rev Microbiol, 13(5):310-317.
[4]Chung PY, Toh YS, 2014. Anti-biofilm agents: recent breakthrough against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathog Dis, 70(3):231-239.
[5]Clementi EA, Wilhelm KR, Schleucher J, et al., 2013. A complex of equine lysozyme and oleic acid with bactericidal activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS ONE, 8(11):e80649.
[6]Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al., 1995. Microbial biofilms. Ann Rev Microbiol, 49:711-745.
[7]Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP, 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, 284(5418):1318-1322.
[8]Davies D, 2003. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2(2):114-122.
[9]de Zoysa GH, Cameron AJ, Hegde VV, et al., 2015. Antimicrobial peptides with potential for biofilm eradication: synthesis and structure activity relationship studies of battacin peptides. J Med Chem, 58(2):625-639.
[10]Gellatly SL, Hancock RE, 2013. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses. Pathog Dis, 67(3):159-173.
[11]Joo HS, Otto M, 2012. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens. Chem Biol, 19(12):1503-1513.
[12]Kim J, Park HD, Chung S, 2012. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules, 17(8):9818-9834.
[13]Kwiecinski J, Eick S, Wojcik K, 2009. Effects of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil on Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms and stationary growth phase. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 33(4):343-347.
[14]Lam J, Chan R, Lam K, et al., 1980. Production of mucoid microcolonies by Pseudomonas aeruginosa within infected lungs in cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun, 28(2):546-556.
[15]Li J, Wu HQ, Liu ZG, 2009. Acaricidal activity of clove bud oil against Dermatophagoides farinae (Acari: Pyroglyphidae). Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 27(6):492-493, 497 (in Chinese).
[16]Luis A, Breitenfeld L, Ferreira S, et al., 2014. Antimicrobial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic activities of Hakea sericea Schrader extracts. Pharmacogn Mag, 10(Suppl 1):S6-S13.
[17]Murphy K, Park AJ, Hao Y, et al., 2014. Influence of O polysaccharides on biofilm development and outer membrane vesicle biogenesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol, 196(7):1306-1317.
[18]Musa AM, Ibrahim MA, Aliyu AB, et al., 2015. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of hexane leaf extract of Anisopus mannii (Asclepiadaceae). J Intercult Ethnopharmacol, 4(2):129-133.
[19]O'Donnell F, Smyth TJP, Ramachandran VN, et al., 2010. A study of the antimicrobial activity of selected synthetic and naturally occurring quinolones. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 35(1):30-38.
[20]Oliver A, Mulet X, Lopez-Causape C, et al., 2015. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist Updat, 21-22:41-59.
[21]Orhan DD, Ozcelik B, Ozgen S, et al., 2010. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activities of some flavonoids. Microbiol Res, 165(6):496-504.
[22]Papa R, Selan L, Parrilli E, et al., 2015. Anti-biofilm activities from marine cold adapted bacteria against staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol, 6:1333.
[23]Patra JK, Das G, Baek KH, 2015. Chemical composition and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of an essential oil extracted from an edible seaweed, Laminaria japonica L. Molecules, 20(7):12093-12113.
[24]Silby MW, Winstanley C, Godfrey SA, et al., 2011. Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 35(4):652-680.
[25]Sitaram C, Rupakula RB, Reddy BN, et al., 2011. Determination of alkyl methanesulfonates in doxazosin mesylate by gas chromatography-mass spectrometer. Indian J Pharm Sci, 73(1):107-110.
[26]Stewart PS, Costerton JW, 2001. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet, 358(9276):135-138.
[27]Sutherland IW, 2001. The biofilm matrix—an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. Trends Microbiol, 9(5):222-227.
[28]Tan Z, Lei Y, Zhang B, et al., 1997. Comparison of pharmacological studies on Ootheca Mantidis. China J Chin Mater Med, 22(8):496-499 (in Chinese).
[29]Tu YY, 2011. The discovery of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine. Nat Med, 17(10):1217-1220.
[30]Wang W, Chanda W, Zhong M, 2015. The relationship between biofilm and outer membrane vesicles: a novel therapy overview. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 362(15):fnv117.
[31]Wen LL, Wan DG, Ren Y, et al., 2013. Corresponding relationship between Mantis and Mantidis oötheca (Sangpiaoxiao). China J Chin Mater Med, 38(7):966-968 (in Chinese).
[32]Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Bennett ME, et al., 2010. Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm. J Wound Care, 19(2):45-46.
[33]Yang L, Liu Y, Wu H, et al., 2012. Combating biofilms. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 65(2):146-157.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>